Cargando…

Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides

BACKGROUND: Identifying cancer hazards is the first step towards cancer prevention. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, which has evaluated nearly 1,000 agents for their carcinogenic potential since 1971, typically selects agents for hazard identification on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guha, Neela, Guyton, Kathryn Z., Loomis, Dana, Barupal, Dinesh Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186
_version_ 1782471113187524608
author Guha, Neela
Guyton, Kathryn Z.
Loomis, Dana
Barupal, Dinesh Kumar
author_facet Guha, Neela
Guyton, Kathryn Z.
Loomis, Dana
Barupal, Dinesh Kumar
author_sort Guha, Neela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying cancer hazards is the first step towards cancer prevention. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, which has evaluated nearly 1,000 agents for their carcinogenic potential since 1971, typically selects agents for hazard identification on the basis of public nominations, expert advice, published data on carcinogenicity, and public health importance. OBJECTIVES: Here, we present a novel and complementary strategy for identifying agents for hazard evaluation using chemoinformatics, database integration, and automated text mining. DISCUSSION: To inform selection among a broad range of pesticides nominated for evaluation, we identified and screened nearly 6,000 relevant chemical structures, after which we systematically compiled information on 980 pesticides, creating network maps that allowed cluster visualization by chemical similarity, pesticide class, and publicly available information concerning cancer epidemiology, cancer bioassays, and carcinogenic mechanisms. For the IARC Monograph meetings that took place in March and June 2015, this approach supported high-priority evaluation of glyphosate, malathion, parathion, tetrachlorvinphos, diazinon, p,p′-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), lindane, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic approach, accounting for chemical similarity and overlaying multiple data sources, can be used by risk assessors as well as by researchers to systematize, inform, and increase efficiency in selecting and prioritizing agents for hazard identification, risk assessment, regulation, or further investigation. This approach could be extended to an array of outcomes and agents, including occupational carcinogens, drugs, and foods. CITATION: Guha N, Guyton KZ, Loomis D, Barupal DK. 2016. Prioritizing chemicals for risk assessment using chemoinformatics: examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides. Environ Health Perspect 124:1823–1829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5132635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51326352016-12-12 Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides Guha, Neela Guyton, Kathryn Z. Loomis, Dana Barupal, Dinesh Kumar Environ Health Perspect Research BACKGROUND: Identifying cancer hazards is the first step towards cancer prevention. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs Programme, which has evaluated nearly 1,000 agents for their carcinogenic potential since 1971, typically selects agents for hazard identification on the basis of public nominations, expert advice, published data on carcinogenicity, and public health importance. OBJECTIVES: Here, we present a novel and complementary strategy for identifying agents for hazard evaluation using chemoinformatics, database integration, and automated text mining. DISCUSSION: To inform selection among a broad range of pesticides nominated for evaluation, we identified and screened nearly 6,000 relevant chemical structures, after which we systematically compiled information on 980 pesticides, creating network maps that allowed cluster visualization by chemical similarity, pesticide class, and publicly available information concerning cancer epidemiology, cancer bioassays, and carcinogenic mechanisms. For the IARC Monograph meetings that took place in March and June 2015, this approach supported high-priority evaluation of glyphosate, malathion, parathion, tetrachlorvinphos, diazinon, p,p′-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), lindane, and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic approach, accounting for chemical similarity and overlaying multiple data sources, can be used by risk assessors as well as by researchers to systematize, inform, and increase efficiency in selecting and prioritizing agents for hazard identification, risk assessment, regulation, or further investigation. This approach could be extended to an array of outcomes and agents, including occupational carcinogens, drugs, and foods. CITATION: Guha N, Guyton KZ, Loomis D, Barupal DK. 2016. Prioritizing chemicals for risk assessment using chemoinformatics: examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides. Environ Health Perspect 124:1823–1829; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2016-05-10 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5132635/ /pubmed/27164621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Guha, Neela
Guyton, Kathryn Z.
Loomis, Dana
Barupal, Dinesh Kumar
Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title_full Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title_fullStr Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title_short Prioritizing Chemicals for Risk Assessment Using Chemoinformatics: Examples from the IARC Monographs on Pesticides
title_sort prioritizing chemicals for risk assessment using chemoinformatics: examples from the iarc monographs on pesticides
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27164621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/EHP186
work_keys_str_mv AT guhaneela prioritizingchemicalsforriskassessmentusingchemoinformaticsexamplesfromtheiarcmonographsonpesticides
AT guytonkathrynz prioritizingchemicalsforriskassessmentusingchemoinformaticsexamplesfromtheiarcmonographsonpesticides
AT loomisdana prioritizingchemicalsforriskassessmentusingchemoinformaticsexamplesfromtheiarcmonographsonpesticides
AT barupaldineshkumar prioritizingchemicalsforriskassessmentusingchemoinformaticsexamplesfromtheiarcmonographsonpesticides