Cargando…

Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example

Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. Whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kassraian-Fard, Pegah, Matthis, Caroline, Balsters, Joshua H., Maathuis, Marloes H., Wenderoth, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177
_version_ 1782471197332602880
author Kassraian-Fard, Pegah
Matthis, Caroline
Balsters, Joshua H.
Maathuis, Marloes H.
Wenderoth, Nicole
author_facet Kassraian-Fard, Pegah
Matthis, Caroline
Balsters, Joshua H.
Maathuis, Marloes H.
Wenderoth, Nicole
author_sort Kassraian-Fard, Pegah
collection PubMed
description Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. While the application of Machine Learning classification methods (ML classifiers) to neuroimaging data has the potential to speed and simplify diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, the methods, assumptions, and analytical steps are currently opaque and not accessible to researchers and clinicians outside the field. In this paper, we describe potential classification pipelines for autism spectrum disorder, as an example of a psychiatric disorder. The analyses are based on resting-state fMRI data derived from a multisite data repository (ABIDE). We compare several popular ML classifiers such as support vector machines, neural networks, and regression approaches, among others. In a tutorial style, written to be equally accessible for researchers and clinicians, we explain the rationale of each classification approach, clarify the underlying assumptions, and discuss possible pitfalls and challenges. We also provide the data as well as the MATLAB code we used to achieve our results. We show that out-of-the-box ML classifiers can yield classification accuracies of about 60–70%. Finally, we discuss how classification accuracy can be further improved, and we mention methodological developments that are needed to pave the way for the use of ML classifiers in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5133050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51330502016-12-16 Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example Kassraian-Fard, Pegah Matthis, Caroline Balsters, Joshua H. Maathuis, Marloes H. Wenderoth, Nicole Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. While the application of Machine Learning classification methods (ML classifiers) to neuroimaging data has the potential to speed and simplify diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, the methods, assumptions, and analytical steps are currently opaque and not accessible to researchers and clinicians outside the field. In this paper, we describe potential classification pipelines for autism spectrum disorder, as an example of a psychiatric disorder. The analyses are based on resting-state fMRI data derived from a multisite data repository (ABIDE). We compare several popular ML classifiers such as support vector machines, neural networks, and regression approaches, among others. In a tutorial style, written to be equally accessible for researchers and clinicians, we explain the rationale of each classification approach, clarify the underlying assumptions, and discuss possible pitfalls and challenges. We also provide the data as well as the MATLAB code we used to achieve our results. We show that out-of-the-box ML classifiers can yield classification accuracies of about 60–70%. Finally, we discuss how classification accuracy can be further improved, and we mention methodological developments that are needed to pave the way for the use of ML classifiers in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5133050/ /pubmed/27990125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kassraian-Fard, Matthis, Balsters, Maathuis and Wenderoth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Kassraian-Fard, Pegah
Matthis, Caroline
Balsters, Joshua H.
Maathuis, Marloes H.
Wenderoth, Nicole
Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title_full Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title_fullStr Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title_full_unstemmed Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title_short Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
title_sort promises, pitfalls, and basic guidelines for applying machine learning classifiers to psychiatric imaging data, with autism as an example
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990125
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177
work_keys_str_mv AT kassraianfardpegah promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample
AT matthiscaroline promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample
AT balstersjoshuah promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample
AT maathuismarloesh promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample
AT wenderothnicole promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample