Cargando…
Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example
Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. Whi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177 |
_version_ | 1782471197332602880 |
---|---|
author | Kassraian-Fard, Pegah Matthis, Caroline Balsters, Joshua H. Maathuis, Marloes H. Wenderoth, Nicole |
author_facet | Kassraian-Fard, Pegah Matthis, Caroline Balsters, Joshua H. Maathuis, Marloes H. Wenderoth, Nicole |
author_sort | Kassraian-Fard, Pegah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. While the application of Machine Learning classification methods (ML classifiers) to neuroimaging data has the potential to speed and simplify diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, the methods, assumptions, and analytical steps are currently opaque and not accessible to researchers and clinicians outside the field. In this paper, we describe potential classification pipelines for autism spectrum disorder, as an example of a psychiatric disorder. The analyses are based on resting-state fMRI data derived from a multisite data repository (ABIDE). We compare several popular ML classifiers such as support vector machines, neural networks, and regression approaches, among others. In a tutorial style, written to be equally accessible for researchers and clinicians, we explain the rationale of each classification approach, clarify the underlying assumptions, and discuss possible pitfalls and challenges. We also provide the data as well as the MATLAB code we used to achieve our results. We show that out-of-the-box ML classifiers can yield classification accuracies of about 60–70%. Finally, we discuss how classification accuracy can be further improved, and we mention methodological developments that are needed to pave the way for the use of ML classifiers in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5133050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51330502016-12-16 Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example Kassraian-Fard, Pegah Matthis, Caroline Balsters, Joshua H. Maathuis, Marloes H. Wenderoth, Nicole Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Most psychiatric disorders are associated with subtle alterations in brain function and are subject to large interindividual differences. Typically, the diagnosis of these disorders requires time-consuming behavioral assessments administered by a multidisciplinary team with extensive experience. While the application of Machine Learning classification methods (ML classifiers) to neuroimaging data has the potential to speed and simplify diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, the methods, assumptions, and analytical steps are currently opaque and not accessible to researchers and clinicians outside the field. In this paper, we describe potential classification pipelines for autism spectrum disorder, as an example of a psychiatric disorder. The analyses are based on resting-state fMRI data derived from a multisite data repository (ABIDE). We compare several popular ML classifiers such as support vector machines, neural networks, and regression approaches, among others. In a tutorial style, written to be equally accessible for researchers and clinicians, we explain the rationale of each classification approach, clarify the underlying assumptions, and discuss possible pitfalls and challenges. We also provide the data as well as the MATLAB code we used to achieve our results. We show that out-of-the-box ML classifiers can yield classification accuracies of about 60–70%. Finally, we discuss how classification accuracy can be further improved, and we mention methodological developments that are needed to pave the way for the use of ML classifiers in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5133050/ /pubmed/27990125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kassraian-Fard, Matthis, Balsters, Maathuis and Wenderoth. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Kassraian-Fard, Pegah Matthis, Caroline Balsters, Joshua H. Maathuis, Marloes H. Wenderoth, Nicole Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title | Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title_full | Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title_fullStr | Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title_full_unstemmed | Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title_short | Promises, Pitfalls, and Basic Guidelines for Applying Machine Learning Classifiers to Psychiatric Imaging Data, with Autism as an Example |
title_sort | promises, pitfalls, and basic guidelines for applying machine learning classifiers to psychiatric imaging data, with autism as an example |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27990125 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kassraianfardpegah promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample AT matthiscaroline promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample AT balstersjoshuah promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample AT maathuismarloesh promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample AT wenderothnicole promisespitfallsandbasicguidelinesforapplyingmachinelearningclassifierstopsychiatricimagingdatawithautismasanexample |