Cargando…
Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles
BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) isolated from the stromal vascular fraction are a source of mesenchymal stem cells that have been shown to be beneficial in many regenerative medicine applications. ASCs are an attractive source of stem cells in particular, due to their lack of i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3712-1 |
_version_ | 1782471223973773312 |
---|---|
author | Ferng, Alice S. Marsh, Katherine M. Fleming, Jamie M. Conway, Renee F. Schipper, David Bajaj, Naing Connell, Alana M. Pilikian, Tia Johnson, Kitsie Runyan, Ray Black, Stephen M. Szivek, John A. Khalpey, Zain |
author_facet | Ferng, Alice S. Marsh, Katherine M. Fleming, Jamie M. Conway, Renee F. Schipper, David Bajaj, Naing Connell, Alana M. Pilikian, Tia Johnson, Kitsie Runyan, Ray Black, Stephen M. Szivek, John A. Khalpey, Zain |
author_sort | Ferng, Alice S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) isolated from the stromal vascular fraction are a source of mesenchymal stem cells that have been shown to be beneficial in many regenerative medicine applications. ASCs are an attractive source of stem cells in particular, due to their lack of immunogenicity. This study examines differences between mitochondrial bioenergetic profiles of ASCs isolated from adipose tissue of five peri-organ regions: pericardial, thymic, knee, shoulder, and abdomen. RESULTS: Flow cytometry showed that the majority of each ASC population isolated from the adipose tissue of 12 donors, with an n = 3 for each tissue type, were positive for MSC markers CD90, CD73, and CD105, and negative for hematopoietic markers CD34, CD11B, CD19, and CD45. Bioenergetic profiles were obtained for ASCs with an n = 4 for each tissue type and graphed together for comparison. Mitochondrial stress tests provided the following measurements: basal respiration rate (measured as oxygen consumption rate [pmol O(2)/min], ATP production, proton leak, maximal respiration, respiratory control ratio, coupling efficiency, and non-mitochondrial respiration. Glycolytic stress tests provided the following measurements: basal glycolysis rate (measured as extracellular acidification rate [mpH/min]), glycolytic capacity, glycolytic reserve, and non-glycolytic acidification. CONCLUSIONS: The main goal of this manuscript was to provide baseline reference values for future experiments and to compare bioenergetic potentials of ASCs isolated from adipose tissue harvested from different anatomical locations. Through an investigation of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis, it was demonstrated that bioenergetic profiles do not significantly differ by region due to depot-dependent and donor-dependent variability. Thus, although the physiological function, microenvironment and anatomical harvest site may directly affect the characteristics of ASCs isolated from different organ regions, the ultimate utility of ASCs remains independent of the anatomical harvest site. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3712-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5133220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51332202016-12-19 Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles Ferng, Alice S. Marsh, Katherine M. Fleming, Jamie M. Conway, Renee F. Schipper, David Bajaj, Naing Connell, Alana M. Pilikian, Tia Johnson, Kitsie Runyan, Ray Black, Stephen M. Szivek, John A. Khalpey, Zain Springerplus Research BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) isolated from the stromal vascular fraction are a source of mesenchymal stem cells that have been shown to be beneficial in many regenerative medicine applications. ASCs are an attractive source of stem cells in particular, due to their lack of immunogenicity. This study examines differences between mitochondrial bioenergetic profiles of ASCs isolated from adipose tissue of five peri-organ regions: pericardial, thymic, knee, shoulder, and abdomen. RESULTS: Flow cytometry showed that the majority of each ASC population isolated from the adipose tissue of 12 donors, with an n = 3 for each tissue type, were positive for MSC markers CD90, CD73, and CD105, and negative for hematopoietic markers CD34, CD11B, CD19, and CD45. Bioenergetic profiles were obtained for ASCs with an n = 4 for each tissue type and graphed together for comparison. Mitochondrial stress tests provided the following measurements: basal respiration rate (measured as oxygen consumption rate [pmol O(2)/min], ATP production, proton leak, maximal respiration, respiratory control ratio, coupling efficiency, and non-mitochondrial respiration. Glycolytic stress tests provided the following measurements: basal glycolysis rate (measured as extracellular acidification rate [mpH/min]), glycolytic capacity, glycolytic reserve, and non-glycolytic acidification. CONCLUSIONS: The main goal of this manuscript was to provide baseline reference values for future experiments and to compare bioenergetic potentials of ASCs isolated from adipose tissue harvested from different anatomical locations. Through an investigation of mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis, it was demonstrated that bioenergetic profiles do not significantly differ by region due to depot-dependent and donor-dependent variability. Thus, although the physiological function, microenvironment and anatomical harvest site may directly affect the characteristics of ASCs isolated from different organ regions, the ultimate utility of ASCs remains independent of the anatomical harvest site. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-016-3712-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5133220/ /pubmed/27995034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3712-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Ferng, Alice S. Marsh, Katherine M. Fleming, Jamie M. Conway, Renee F. Schipper, David Bajaj, Naing Connell, Alana M. Pilikian, Tia Johnson, Kitsie Runyan, Ray Black, Stephen M. Szivek, John A. Khalpey, Zain Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title | Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title_full | Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title_fullStr | Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title_short | Adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
title_sort | adipose-derived human stem/stromal cells: comparative organ specific mitochondrial bioenergy profiles |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27995034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3712-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferngalices adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT marshkatherinem adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT flemingjamiem adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT conwayreneef adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT schipperdavid adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT bajajnaing adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT connellalanam adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT pilikiantia adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT johnsonkitsie adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT runyanray adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT blackstephenm adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT szivekjohna adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles AT khalpeyzain adiposederivedhumanstemstromalcellscomparativeorganspecificmitochondrialbioenergyprofiles |