Cargando…

Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are multiple commercially available RNA-based biomarkers that are Medicare approved and suggested for use by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. There is uncertainty as to which patients benefit from genomic testing and for whom these tests should be or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Den, R B, Santiago-Jimenez, M, Alter, J, Schliekelman, M, Wagner, J R, Renzulli II, J F, Lee, D I, Brito, C G, Monahan, K, Gburek, B, Kella, N, Vallabhan, G, Abdollah, F, Trabulsi, E J, Lallas, C D, Gomella, L G, Woodlief, T L, Haddad, Z, Lam, L L C, Deheshi, S, Wang, Q, Choeurng, V, du Plessis, M, Jordan, J, Parks, B, Shin, H, Buerki, C, Yousefi, K, Davicioni, E, Patel, V R, Shah, N L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.38
_version_ 1782471234882109440
author Den, R B
Santiago-Jimenez, M
Alter, J
Schliekelman, M
Wagner, J R
Renzulli II, J F
Lee, D I
Brito, C G
Monahan, K
Gburek, B
Kella, N
Vallabhan, G
Abdollah, F
Trabulsi, E J
Lallas, C D
Gomella, L G
Woodlief, T L
Haddad, Z
Lam, L L C
Deheshi, S
Wang, Q
Choeurng, V
du Plessis, M
Jordan, J
Parks, B
Shin, H
Buerki, C
Yousefi, K
Davicioni, E
Patel, V R
Shah, N L
author_facet Den, R B
Santiago-Jimenez, M
Alter, J
Schliekelman, M
Wagner, J R
Renzulli II, J F
Lee, D I
Brito, C G
Monahan, K
Gburek, B
Kella, N
Vallabhan, G
Abdollah, F
Trabulsi, E J
Lallas, C D
Gomella, L G
Woodlief, T L
Haddad, Z
Lam, L L C
Deheshi, S
Wang, Q
Choeurng, V
du Plessis, M
Jordan, J
Parks, B
Shin, H
Buerki, C
Yousefi, K
Davicioni, E
Patel, V R
Shah, N L
author_sort Den, R B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there are multiple commercially available RNA-based biomarkers that are Medicare approved and suggested for use by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. There is uncertainty as to which patients benefit from genomic testing and for whom these tests should be ordered. Here, we examined the correlation patterns of Decipher assay to understand the relationship between the Decipher and patient tumor characteristics. METHODS: De-identified Decipher test results (including Decipher risk scores and clinicopathologic data) from 2 342 consecutive radical prostatectomy (RP) patients tested between January and September 2015 were analyzed. For clinical testing, tumor specimen from the highest Gleason grade was sampled using a 1.5 mm tissue punch. Decipher scores were calculated based on a previously locked model. Correlations between Decipher score and clinicopathologic variables were computed using Spearman's rank correlation. Mixed-effect linear models were used to study the association of practice type and Decipher score. The significance level was 0.05 for all tests. RESULTS: Decipher score had a positive correlation with pathologic Gleason score (PGS; r=0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34−0.41), pathologic T-stage (r=0.31, 95% CI 0.28−0.35), CAPRA-S (r=0.32, 95% CI 0.28−0.37) and patient age (r=0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.13). Decipher reclassified 52%, 76% and 40% of patients in CAPRA-S low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. We detected a 28% incidence of high-risk disease through the Decipher score in pT2 patients and 7% low risk in pT3b/pT4, PGS 8−10 patients. There was no significant difference in the Decipher score between patients from community centers and those from academic centers (P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Although Decipher correlated with baseline tumor characteristics for over 2 000 patients, there was significant reclassification of tumor aggressiveness as compared to clinical parameters alone. Utilization of the Decipher genomic classifier can have major implications in assessment of postoperative risk that may impact physician-patient decision making and ultimately patient management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5133268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51332682016-12-16 Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients Den, R B Santiago-Jimenez, M Alter, J Schliekelman, M Wagner, J R Renzulli II, J F Lee, D I Brito, C G Monahan, K Gburek, B Kella, N Vallabhan, G Abdollah, F Trabulsi, E J Lallas, C D Gomella, L G Woodlief, T L Haddad, Z Lam, L L C Deheshi, S Wang, Q Choeurng, V du Plessis, M Jordan, J Parks, B Shin, H Buerki, C Yousefi, K Davicioni, E Patel, V R Shah, N L Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Currently, there are multiple commercially available RNA-based biomarkers that are Medicare approved and suggested for use by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. There is uncertainty as to which patients benefit from genomic testing and for whom these tests should be ordered. Here, we examined the correlation patterns of Decipher assay to understand the relationship between the Decipher and patient tumor characteristics. METHODS: De-identified Decipher test results (including Decipher risk scores and clinicopathologic data) from 2 342 consecutive radical prostatectomy (RP) patients tested between January and September 2015 were analyzed. For clinical testing, tumor specimen from the highest Gleason grade was sampled using a 1.5 mm tissue punch. Decipher scores were calculated based on a previously locked model. Correlations between Decipher score and clinicopathologic variables were computed using Spearman's rank correlation. Mixed-effect linear models were used to study the association of practice type and Decipher score. The significance level was 0.05 for all tests. RESULTS: Decipher score had a positive correlation with pathologic Gleason score (PGS; r=0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34−0.41), pathologic T-stage (r=0.31, 95% CI 0.28−0.35), CAPRA-S (r=0.32, 95% CI 0.28−0.37) and patient age (r=0.09, 95% CI 0.05-0.13). Decipher reclassified 52%, 76% and 40% of patients in CAPRA-S low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. We detected a 28% incidence of high-risk disease through the Decipher score in pT2 patients and 7% low risk in pT3b/pT4, PGS 8−10 patients. There was no significant difference in the Decipher score between patients from community centers and those from academic centers (P=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Although Decipher correlated with baseline tumor characteristics for over 2 000 patients, there was significant reclassification of tumor aggressiveness as compared to clinical parameters alone. Utilization of the Decipher genomic classifier can have major implications in assessment of postoperative risk that may impact physician-patient decision making and ultimately patient management. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5133268/ /pubmed/27574020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.38 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Den, R B
Santiago-Jimenez, M
Alter, J
Schliekelman, M
Wagner, J R
Renzulli II, J F
Lee, D I
Brito, C G
Monahan, K
Gburek, B
Kella, N
Vallabhan, G
Abdollah, F
Trabulsi, E J
Lallas, C D
Gomella, L G
Woodlief, T L
Haddad, Z
Lam, L L C
Deheshi, S
Wang, Q
Choeurng, V
du Plessis, M
Jordan, J
Parks, B
Shin, H
Buerki, C
Yousefi, K
Davicioni, E
Patel, V R
Shah, N L
Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title_full Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title_fullStr Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title_full_unstemmed Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title_short Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
title_sort decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2016.38
work_keys_str_mv AT denrb deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT santiagojimenezm deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT alterj deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT schliekelmanm deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT wagnerjr deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT renzulliiijf deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT leedi deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT britocg deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT monahank deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT gburekb deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT kellan deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT vallabhang deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT abdollahf deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT trabulsiej deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT lallascd deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT gomellalg deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT woodlieftl deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT haddadz deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT lamllc deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT deheshis deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT wangq deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT choeurngv deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT duplessism deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT jordanj deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT parksb deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT shinh deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT buerkic deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT yousefik deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT davicionie deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT patelvr deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients
AT shahnl deciphercorrelationpatternspostprostatectomyinitialexperiencefrom2342prospectivepatients