Cargando…

Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams

BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, Bond, Gary R., Ruud, Torleif, Ivanecka, Ada, Gray, Richard, Osborn, David, Nolan, Fiona, Henderson, Claire, Mason, Oliver, Goater, Nicky, Kelly, Kathleen, Ambler, Gareth, Morant, Nicola, Onyett, Steve, Lamb, Danielle, Fahmy, Sarah, Brown, Ellie, Paterson, Beth, Sweeney, Angela, Hindle, David, Fullarton, Kate, Frerichs, Johanna, Johnson, Sonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4
_version_ 1782471330481831936
author Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
Bond, Gary R.
Ruud, Torleif
Ivanecka, Ada
Gray, Richard
Osborn, David
Nolan, Fiona
Henderson, Claire
Mason, Oliver
Goater, Nicky
Kelly, Kathleen
Ambler, Gareth
Morant, Nicola
Onyett, Steve
Lamb, Danielle
Fahmy, Sarah
Brown, Ellie
Paterson, Beth
Sweeney, Angela
Hindle, David
Fullarton, Kate
Frerichs, Johanna
Johnson, Sonia
author_facet Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
Bond, Gary R.
Ruud, Torleif
Ivanecka, Ada
Gray, Richard
Osborn, David
Nolan, Fiona
Henderson, Claire
Mason, Oliver
Goater, Nicky
Kelly, Kathleen
Ambler, Gareth
Morant, Nicola
Onyett, Steve
Lamb, Danielle
Fahmy, Sarah
Brown, Ellie
Paterson, Beth
Sweeney, Angela
Hindle, David
Fullarton, Kate
Frerichs, Johanna
Johnson, Sonia
author_sort Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT implementation and outcomes have been variable. We aimed to develop and test a fidelity scale to assess adherence to a model of best practice for CRTs, based on best available evidence. METHODS: A concept mapping process was used to develop a CRT fidelity scale. Participants (n = 68) from a range of stakeholder groups prioritised and grouped statements (n = 72) about important components of the CRT model, generated from a literature review, national survey and qualitative interviews. These data were analysed using Ariadne software and the resultant cluster solution informed item selection for a CRT fidelity scale. Operational criteria and scoring anchor points were developed for each item. The CORE CRT fidelity scale was then piloted in 75 CRTs in the UK to assess the range of scores achieved and feasibility for use in a 1-day fidelity review process. Trained reviewers (n = 16) rated CRT service fidelity in a vignette exercise to test the scale’s inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement within and between stakeholder groups regarding the most important components of the CRT model. A 39-item measure of CRT model fidelity was developed. Piloting indicated that the scale was feasible for use to assess CRT model fidelity and had good face validity. The wide range of item scores and total scores across CRT services in the pilot demonstrate the measure can distinguish lower and higher fidelity services. Moderately good inter-rater reliability was found, with an estimated correlation between individual ratings of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale has been developed through a rigorous and systematic process. Promising initial testing indicates its value in assessing adherence to a model of CRT best practice and to support service improvement monitoring and planning. Further research is required to establish its psychometric properties and international applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5133753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51337532016-12-15 Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor Bond, Gary R. Ruud, Torleif Ivanecka, Ada Gray, Richard Osborn, David Nolan, Fiona Henderson, Claire Mason, Oliver Goater, Nicky Kelly, Kathleen Ambler, Gareth Morant, Nicola Onyett, Steve Lamb, Danielle Fahmy, Sarah Brown, Ellie Paterson, Beth Sweeney, Angela Hindle, David Fullarton, Kate Frerichs, Johanna Johnson, Sonia BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT implementation and outcomes have been variable. We aimed to develop and test a fidelity scale to assess adherence to a model of best practice for CRTs, based on best available evidence. METHODS: A concept mapping process was used to develop a CRT fidelity scale. Participants (n = 68) from a range of stakeholder groups prioritised and grouped statements (n = 72) about important components of the CRT model, generated from a literature review, national survey and qualitative interviews. These data were analysed using Ariadne software and the resultant cluster solution informed item selection for a CRT fidelity scale. Operational criteria and scoring anchor points were developed for each item. The CORE CRT fidelity scale was then piloted in 75 CRTs in the UK to assess the range of scores achieved and feasibility for use in a 1-day fidelity review process. Trained reviewers (n = 16) rated CRT service fidelity in a vignette exercise to test the scale’s inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement within and between stakeholder groups regarding the most important components of the CRT model. A 39-item measure of CRT model fidelity was developed. Piloting indicated that the scale was feasible for use to assess CRT model fidelity and had good face validity. The wide range of item scores and total scores across CRT services in the pilot demonstrate the measure can distinguish lower and higher fidelity services. Moderately good inter-rater reliability was found, with an estimated correlation between individual ratings of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale has been developed through a rigorous and systematic process. Promising initial testing indicates its value in assessing adherence to a model of CRT best practice and to support service improvement monitoring and planning. Further research is required to establish its psychometric properties and international applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5133753/ /pubmed/27905909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
Bond, Gary R.
Ruud, Torleif
Ivanecka, Ada
Gray, Richard
Osborn, David
Nolan, Fiona
Henderson, Claire
Mason, Oliver
Goater, Nicky
Kelly, Kathleen
Ambler, Gareth
Morant, Nicola
Onyett, Steve
Lamb, Danielle
Fahmy, Sarah
Brown, Ellie
Paterson, Beth
Sweeney, Angela
Hindle, David
Fullarton, Kate
Frerichs, Johanna
Johnson, Sonia
Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title_full Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title_fullStr Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title_full_unstemmed Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title_short Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
title_sort development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health crisis resolution teams
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lloydevansbrynmor developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT bondgaryr developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT ruudtorleif developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT ivaneckaada developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT grayrichard developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT osborndavid developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT nolanfiona developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT hendersonclaire developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT masonoliver developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT goaternicky developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT kellykathleen developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT amblergareth developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT morantnicola developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT onyettsteve developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT lambdanielle developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT fahmysarah developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT brownellie developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT patersonbeth developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT sweeneyangela developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT hindledavid developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT fullartonkate developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT frerichsjohanna developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams
AT johnsonsonia developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams