Cargando…
Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams
BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4 |
_version_ | 1782471330481831936 |
---|---|
author | Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor Bond, Gary R. Ruud, Torleif Ivanecka, Ada Gray, Richard Osborn, David Nolan, Fiona Henderson, Claire Mason, Oliver Goater, Nicky Kelly, Kathleen Ambler, Gareth Morant, Nicola Onyett, Steve Lamb, Danielle Fahmy, Sarah Brown, Ellie Paterson, Beth Sweeney, Angela Hindle, David Fullarton, Kate Frerichs, Johanna Johnson, Sonia |
author_facet | Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor Bond, Gary R. Ruud, Torleif Ivanecka, Ada Gray, Richard Osborn, David Nolan, Fiona Henderson, Claire Mason, Oliver Goater, Nicky Kelly, Kathleen Ambler, Gareth Morant, Nicola Onyett, Steve Lamb, Danielle Fahmy, Sarah Brown, Ellie Paterson, Beth Sweeney, Angela Hindle, David Fullarton, Kate Frerichs, Johanna Johnson, Sonia |
author_sort | Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT implementation and outcomes have been variable. We aimed to develop and test a fidelity scale to assess adherence to a model of best practice for CRTs, based on best available evidence. METHODS: A concept mapping process was used to develop a CRT fidelity scale. Participants (n = 68) from a range of stakeholder groups prioritised and grouped statements (n = 72) about important components of the CRT model, generated from a literature review, national survey and qualitative interviews. These data were analysed using Ariadne software and the resultant cluster solution informed item selection for a CRT fidelity scale. Operational criteria and scoring anchor points were developed for each item. The CORE CRT fidelity scale was then piloted in 75 CRTs in the UK to assess the range of scores achieved and feasibility for use in a 1-day fidelity review process. Trained reviewers (n = 16) rated CRT service fidelity in a vignette exercise to test the scale’s inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement within and between stakeholder groups regarding the most important components of the CRT model. A 39-item measure of CRT model fidelity was developed. Piloting indicated that the scale was feasible for use to assess CRT model fidelity and had good face validity. The wide range of item scores and total scores across CRT services in the pilot demonstrate the measure can distinguish lower and higher fidelity services. Moderately good inter-rater reliability was found, with an estimated correlation between individual ratings of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale has been developed through a rigorous and systematic process. Promising initial testing indicates its value in assessing adherence to a model of CRT best practice and to support service improvement monitoring and planning. Further research is required to establish its psychometric properties and international applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5133753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51337532016-12-15 Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor Bond, Gary R. Ruud, Torleif Ivanecka, Ada Gray, Richard Osborn, David Nolan, Fiona Henderson, Claire Mason, Oliver Goater, Nicky Kelly, Kathleen Ambler, Gareth Morant, Nicola Onyett, Steve Lamb, Danielle Fahmy, Sarah Brown, Ellie Paterson, Beth Sweeney, Angela Hindle, David Fullarton, Kate Frerichs, Johanna Johnson, Sonia BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Crisis Resolution Teams (CRTs) provide short-term intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crisis. Trial evidence suggests CRTs can be effective at reducing hospital admissions and increasing satisfaction with acute care. When scaled up to national level however, CRT implementation and outcomes have been variable. We aimed to develop and test a fidelity scale to assess adherence to a model of best practice for CRTs, based on best available evidence. METHODS: A concept mapping process was used to develop a CRT fidelity scale. Participants (n = 68) from a range of stakeholder groups prioritised and grouped statements (n = 72) about important components of the CRT model, generated from a literature review, national survey and qualitative interviews. These data were analysed using Ariadne software and the resultant cluster solution informed item selection for a CRT fidelity scale. Operational criteria and scoring anchor points were developed for each item. The CORE CRT fidelity scale was then piloted in 75 CRTs in the UK to assess the range of scores achieved and feasibility for use in a 1-day fidelity review process. Trained reviewers (n = 16) rated CRT service fidelity in a vignette exercise to test the scale’s inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: There were high levels of agreement within and between stakeholder groups regarding the most important components of the CRT model. A 39-item measure of CRT model fidelity was developed. Piloting indicated that the scale was feasible for use to assess CRT model fidelity and had good face validity. The wide range of item scores and total scores across CRT services in the pilot demonstrate the measure can distinguish lower and higher fidelity services. Moderately good inter-rater reliability was found, with an estimated correlation between individual ratings of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: The CORE CRT Fidelity Scale has been developed through a rigorous and systematic process. Promising initial testing indicates its value in assessing adherence to a model of CRT best practice and to support service improvement monitoring and planning. Further research is required to establish its psychometric properties and international applicability. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5133753/ /pubmed/27905909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor Bond, Gary R. Ruud, Torleif Ivanecka, Ada Gray, Richard Osborn, David Nolan, Fiona Henderson, Claire Mason, Oliver Goater, Nicky Kelly, Kathleen Ambler, Gareth Morant, Nicola Onyett, Steve Lamb, Danielle Fahmy, Sarah Brown, Ellie Paterson, Beth Sweeney, Angela Hindle, David Fullarton, Kate Frerichs, Johanna Johnson, Sonia Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title | Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title_full | Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title_fullStr | Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title_short | Development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health Crisis Resolution Teams |
title_sort | development of a measure of model fidelity for mental health crisis resolution teams |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1139-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lloydevansbrynmor developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT bondgaryr developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT ruudtorleif developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT ivaneckaada developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT grayrichard developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT osborndavid developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT nolanfiona developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT hendersonclaire developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT masonoliver developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT goaternicky developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT kellykathleen developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT amblergareth developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT morantnicola developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT onyettsteve developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT lambdanielle developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT fahmysarah developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT brownellie developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT patersonbeth developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT sweeneyangela developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT hindledavid developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT fullartonkate developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT frerichsjohanna developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams AT johnsonsonia developmentofameasureofmodelfidelityformentalhealthcrisisresolutionteams |