Cargando…

Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions

The IDH1/2 gene mutations, ATRX loss/mutation, 1p/19q status, and MGMT promoter methylation are increasingly used as prognostic or predictive biomarkers of gliomas. However, the effect of their combination on radiation therapy outcome is discussable. Previously, we demonstrated that the IDH1 c.G395A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roszkowski, Krzysztof, Furtak, Jacek, Zurawski, Bogdan, Szylberg, Tadeusz, Lewandowska, Marzena A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111876
_version_ 1782471358599397376
author Roszkowski, Krzysztof
Furtak, Jacek
Zurawski, Bogdan
Szylberg, Tadeusz
Lewandowska, Marzena A.
author_facet Roszkowski, Krzysztof
Furtak, Jacek
Zurawski, Bogdan
Szylberg, Tadeusz
Lewandowska, Marzena A.
author_sort Roszkowski, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description The IDH1/2 gene mutations, ATRX loss/mutation, 1p/19q status, and MGMT promoter methylation are increasingly used as prognostic or predictive biomarkers of gliomas. However, the effect of their combination on radiation therapy outcome is discussable. Previously, we demonstrated that the IDH1 c.G395A; p.R132H mutation was associated with longer survival in grade II astrocytoma and GBM (Glioblastoma). Here we analyzed the MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with a known mutation status in codon 132 of IDH1, followed by clinical and genetic data analysis based on the two statuses. After a subtotal tumor resection, the patients were treated using IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) with 6 MeV photons. The total dose was: 54 Gy for astrocytoma II, 60 Gy for astrocytoma III, 60 Gy for glioblastoma, 2 Gy per day, with 24 h intervals, five days per week. The patients with MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 somatic mutation (OS = 40 months) had a better prognosis than those with MGMT methylation alone (OS = 18 months). In patients with astrocytoma anaplasticum (n = 7) with the IDH1 p.R132H mutation and hypermethylated MGMT, the prognosis was particularly favorable (median OS = 47 months). In patients with astrocytoma II meeting the above criteria, the prognosis was also better than in those not meeting those criteria. The IDH1 mutation appears more relevant for the prognosis than MGMT methylation. The IDH1 p.R132H mutation combined with MGMT hypermethylation seems to be the most advantageous for treatment success. Patients not meeting those criteria may require more aggressive treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5133876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51338762016-12-12 Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions Roszkowski, Krzysztof Furtak, Jacek Zurawski, Bogdan Szylberg, Tadeusz Lewandowska, Marzena A. Int J Mol Sci Article The IDH1/2 gene mutations, ATRX loss/mutation, 1p/19q status, and MGMT promoter methylation are increasingly used as prognostic or predictive biomarkers of gliomas. However, the effect of their combination on radiation therapy outcome is discussable. Previously, we demonstrated that the IDH1 c.G395A; p.R132H mutation was associated with longer survival in grade II astrocytoma and GBM (Glioblastoma). Here we analyzed the MGMT promoter methylation status in patients with a known mutation status in codon 132 of IDH1, followed by clinical and genetic data analysis based on the two statuses. After a subtotal tumor resection, the patients were treated using IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) with 6 MeV photons. The total dose was: 54 Gy for astrocytoma II, 60 Gy for astrocytoma III, 60 Gy for glioblastoma, 2 Gy per day, with 24 h intervals, five days per week. The patients with MGMT promoter methylation and IDH1 somatic mutation (OS = 40 months) had a better prognosis than those with MGMT methylation alone (OS = 18 months). In patients with astrocytoma anaplasticum (n = 7) with the IDH1 p.R132H mutation and hypermethylated MGMT, the prognosis was particularly favorable (median OS = 47 months). In patients with astrocytoma II meeting the above criteria, the prognosis was also better than in those not meeting those criteria. The IDH1 mutation appears more relevant for the prognosis than MGMT methylation. The IDH1 p.R132H mutation combined with MGMT hypermethylation seems to be the most advantageous for treatment success. Patients not meeting those criteria may require more aggressive treatments. MDPI 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5133876/ /pubmed/27834917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111876 Text en © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roszkowski, Krzysztof
Furtak, Jacek
Zurawski, Bogdan
Szylberg, Tadeusz
Lewandowska, Marzena A.
Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title_full Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title_fullStr Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title_full_unstemmed Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title_short Potential Role of Methylation Marker in Glioma Supporting Clinical Decisions
title_sort potential role of methylation marker in glioma supporting clinical decisions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5133876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834917
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms17111876
work_keys_str_mv AT roszkowskikrzysztof potentialroleofmethylationmarkeringliomasupportingclinicaldecisions
AT furtakjacek potentialroleofmethylationmarkeringliomasupportingclinicaldecisions
AT zurawskibogdan potentialroleofmethylationmarkeringliomasupportingclinicaldecisions
AT szylbergtadeusz potentialroleofmethylationmarkeringliomasupportingclinicaldecisions
AT lewandowskamarzenaa potentialroleofmethylationmarkeringliomasupportingclinicaldecisions