Cargando…

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of selective and nonsele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berbenetz, Nicolas M., Mrkobrada, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x
_version_ 1782471408812556288
author Berbenetz, Nicolas M.
Mrkobrada, Marko
author_facet Berbenetz, Nicolas M.
Mrkobrada, Marko
author_sort Berbenetz, Nicolas M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of selective and nonselective MRAs in HFrEF and HFpEF. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MRAs in adults with HFpEF or HFrEF if they reported data on major adverse cardiac events or drug safety. RESULTS: We identified 15 studies representing 16321 patients. MRAs were associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I(2) 0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.83 [0.77–0.88], I(2) 0%), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.80 [0.70–0.92], I(2) 58.4%). However, an a-priori specified subgroup analysis demonstrated that these benefits were limited to HFrEF (cardiovascular death RR 0.79 [0.73–0.86], I(2) 0%; all-cause mortality RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.76 [0.64–0.90], I(2) 68%), but not HFpEF (all-cause mortality RR 0.92 [0.79–1.08], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.91 [0.67–1.24], I(2) 17%). MRAs increased the risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.03 [1.78–2.31], I(2) 0%). Nonselective MRAs, but not selective MRAs increased the risk of gynecomastia (RR 7.37 [4.42–12.30], I(2) 0% vs. RR 0.74 [0.43–1.27], I(2) 0%). Evidence was of moderate quality for cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations; and high-quality for hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. CONCLUSIONS: MRAs reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events in HFrEF but not HFpEF. MRA use in HFpEF increases the risk of harm from hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. Selective MRAs are equally effective as nonselective MRAs, without a risk of gynecomastia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5134129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51341292016-12-15 Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis Berbenetz, Nicolas M. Mrkobrada, Marko BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of selective and nonselective MRAs in HFrEF and HFpEF. METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MRAs in adults with HFpEF or HFrEF if they reported data on major adverse cardiac events or drug safety. RESULTS: We identified 15 studies representing 16321 patients. MRAs were associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I(2) 0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.83 [0.77–0.88], I(2) 0%), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.80 [0.70–0.92], I(2) 58.4%). However, an a-priori specified subgroup analysis demonstrated that these benefits were limited to HFrEF (cardiovascular death RR 0.79 [0.73–0.86], I(2) 0%; all-cause mortality RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.76 [0.64–0.90], I(2) 68%), but not HFpEF (all-cause mortality RR 0.92 [0.79–1.08], I(2) 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.91 [0.67–1.24], I(2) 17%). MRAs increased the risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.03 [1.78–2.31], I(2) 0%). Nonselective MRAs, but not selective MRAs increased the risk of gynecomastia (RR 7.37 [4.42–12.30], I(2) 0% vs. RR 0.74 [0.43–1.27], I(2) 0%). Evidence was of moderate quality for cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations; and high-quality for hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. CONCLUSIONS: MRAs reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events in HFrEF but not HFpEF. MRA use in HFpEF increases the risk of harm from hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. Selective MRAs are equally effective as nonselective MRAs, without a risk of gynecomastia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5134129/ /pubmed/27905877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Berbenetz, Nicolas M.
Mrkobrada, Marko
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x
work_keys_str_mv AT berbenetznicolasm mineralocorticoidreceptorantagonistsforheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mrkobradamarko mineralocorticoidreceptorantagonistsforheartfailuresystematicreviewandmetaanalysis