Cargando…

Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery

The purpose of this study was to quantify how the use of two different cutoff criteria affects the test failure rate and potential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in a sample of children subjected to central auditory processing ([C]AP) assessment. Test failure rates for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed, Fox-Thomas, Lisa, Tucker, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942373
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158
_version_ 1782471505508040704
author Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed
Fox-Thomas, Lisa
Tucker, Denise
author_facet Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed
Fox-Thomas, Lisa
Tucker, Denise
author_sort Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to quantify how the use of two different cutoff criteria affects the test failure rate and potential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in a sample of children subjected to central auditory processing ([C]AP) assessment. Test failure rates for the central test battery (CTB) using two different cutoff criteria (1 and 2 SDs below the mean) were measured retrospectively for 98 children who completed (C)AP assessment. The rates of potential (C)APD diagnosis ranged from 86.8% [when a 1 standard deviation (SD) cutoff was used] to 66.2% (when a 2 SD cutoff was used). The current use of two different cutoffs for the CTB has a large impact on the diagnostic rate for (C)APD. These findings have clinical implications for the diagnosis of (C)APD due to the widespread use of the CTB in the United States for the assessment of (C)APD in children. Thus, it is important to create awareness among audiologists that use of the 2 SDs cutoff criterion is recommended for reducing false positives (error).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5134675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51346752016-12-09 Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed Fox-Thomas, Lisa Tucker, Denise Audiol Res Article The purpose of this study was to quantify how the use of two different cutoff criteria affects the test failure rate and potential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorder ([C]APD) in a sample of children subjected to central auditory processing ([C]AP) assessment. Test failure rates for the central test battery (CTB) using two different cutoff criteria (1 and 2 SDs below the mean) were measured retrospectively for 98 children who completed (C)AP assessment. The rates of potential (C)APD diagnosis ranged from 86.8% [when a 1 standard deviation (SD) cutoff was used] to 66.2% (when a 2 SD cutoff was used). The current use of two different cutoffs for the CTB has a large impact on the diagnostic rate for (C)APD. These findings have clinical implications for the diagnosis of (C)APD due to the widespread use of the CTB in the United States for the assessment of (C)APD in children. Thus, it is important to create awareness among audiologists that use of the 2 SDs cutoff criterion is recommended for reducing false positives (error). PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5134675/ /pubmed/27942373 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158 Text en ©Copyright M.A. Shaikh et al., 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Shaikh, Mohsin Ahmed
Fox-Thomas, Lisa
Tucker, Denise
Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title_full Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title_fullStr Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title_short Impact of Different Cutoff Criteria on Rate of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders Diagnosis Using the Central Test Battery
title_sort impact of different cutoff criteria on rate of (central) auditory processing disorders diagnosis using the central test battery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27942373
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.158
work_keys_str_mv AT shaikhmohsinahmed impactofdifferentcutoffcriteriaonrateofcentralauditoryprocessingdisordersdiagnosisusingthecentraltestbattery
AT foxthomaslisa impactofdifferentcutoffcriteriaonrateofcentralauditoryprocessingdisordersdiagnosisusingthecentraltestbattery
AT tuckerdenise impactofdifferentcutoffcriteriaonrateofcentralauditoryprocessingdisordersdiagnosisusingthecentraltestbattery