Cargando…

Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of uric acid (UA) in assessing rectal cancer metastasis. There were 475 newly diagnosed patients with complete data in our study, a total of 475 cases were reviewed, and divided into patients with metastasis and without metastasis. There were several...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Cheng, Xu, Xin-Hua, Wang, Xiao-Long, Xu, Lu, Chen, Zhuo, Li, Yuan-Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005463
_version_ 1782471543440277504
author Yuan, Cheng
Xu, Xin-Hua
Wang, Xiao-Long
Xu, Lu
Chen, Zhuo
Li, Yuan-Qiang
author_facet Yuan, Cheng
Xu, Xin-Hua
Wang, Xiao-Long
Xu, Lu
Chen, Zhuo
Li, Yuan-Qiang
author_sort Yuan, Cheng
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the role of uric acid (UA) in assessing rectal cancer metastasis. There were 475 newly diagnosed patients with complete data in our study, a total of 475 cases were reviewed, and divided into patients with metastasis and without metastasis. There were several statistical differences in age, tumor diameter, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and C-reactive protein (CRP) between the 2 groups. Importantly, serum concentrations of UA in patients with lymphatic metastasis were found to be increased compared with patients without lymphatic metastasis (270.9 ± 52.99 vs 215.8 ± 43.55; P < 0.001). There were positive correlations of serum UA with creatinine (Cr), CRP, and CEA (r = 0.281, P = 0.023; r = 0.312, P = 0.001; r = 0.294, P = 0.017) in rectal cancer patients with metastasis. Multivariate analysis model revealed that elevated serum levels of UA were significant prognostic marker for lymphatic metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, independently of CRP, CEA, and tumor diameter (odds ratio 1.035, 95% CI 1.013–1.057, P = 0.002). In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of serum UA in assessing metastatic rectal cancer patients was 0.803, with sensitivity of 0.864 and specificity of 0.739. Our results suggest that serum UA may be a novel marker in assessing tumor metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5134885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51348852016-12-08 Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy Yuan, Cheng Xu, Xin-Hua Wang, Xiao-Long Xu, Lu Chen, Zhuo Li, Yuan-Qiang Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 The aim of this study was to investigate the role of uric acid (UA) in assessing rectal cancer metastasis. There were 475 newly diagnosed patients with complete data in our study, a total of 475 cases were reviewed, and divided into patients with metastasis and without metastasis. There were several statistical differences in age, tumor diameter, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and C-reactive protein (CRP) between the 2 groups. Importantly, serum concentrations of UA in patients with lymphatic metastasis were found to be increased compared with patients without lymphatic metastasis (270.9 ± 52.99 vs 215.8 ± 43.55; P < 0.001). There were positive correlations of serum UA with creatinine (Cr), CRP, and CEA (r = 0.281, P = 0.023; r = 0.312, P = 0.001; r = 0.294, P = 0.017) in rectal cancer patients with metastasis. Multivariate analysis model revealed that elevated serum levels of UA were significant prognostic marker for lymphatic metastasis in patients with rectal cancer, independently of CRP, CEA, and tumor diameter (odds ratio 1.035, 95% CI 1.013–1.057, P = 0.002). In receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of serum UA in assessing metastatic rectal cancer patients was 0.803, with sensitivity of 0.864 and specificity of 0.739. Our results suggest that serum UA may be a novel marker in assessing tumor metastasis in patients with rectal cancer. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5134885/ /pubmed/27893692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005463 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Yuan, Cheng
Xu, Xin-Hua
Wang, Xiao-Long
Xu, Lu
Chen, Zhuo
Li, Yuan-Qiang
Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title_full Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title_fullStr Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title_short Relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
title_sort relationship between serum uric acid and metastatic and nonmetastatic rectal cancer patients with undergoing no chemotherapy
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5134885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005463
work_keys_str_mv AT yuancheng relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy
AT xuxinhua relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy
AT wangxiaolong relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy
AT xulu relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy
AT chenzhuo relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy
AT liyuanqiang relationshipbetweenserumuricacidandmetastaticandnonmetastaticrectalcancerpatientswithundergoingnochemotherapy