Cargando…

Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training

Typically, balance training has been used as an intervention paradigm either as static or as reactive balance training. Possible differences in functional outcomes between the two modalities have not been profoundly studied. The objective of the study was to investigate the specificity of neuromuscu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freyler, Kathrin, Krause, Anne, Gollhofer, Albert, Ritzmann, Ramona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27911944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167557
_version_ 1782471572678770688
author Freyler, Kathrin
Krause, Anne
Gollhofer, Albert
Ritzmann, Ramona
author_facet Freyler, Kathrin
Krause, Anne
Gollhofer, Albert
Ritzmann, Ramona
author_sort Freyler, Kathrin
collection PubMed
description Typically, balance training has been used as an intervention paradigm either as static or as reactive balance training. Possible differences in functional outcomes between the two modalities have not been profoundly studied. The objective of the study was to investigate the specificity of neuromuscular adaptations in response to two balance intervention modalities within test and intervention paradigms containing characteristics of both profiles: classical sensorimotor training (SMT) referring to a static ledger pivoting around the ankle joint vs. reactive balance training (RBT) using externally applied perturbations to deteriorate body equilibrium. Thirty-eight subjects were assigned to either SMT or RBT. Before and after four weeks of intervention training, postural sway and electromyographic activities of shank and thigh muscles were recorded and co-contraction indices (CCI) were calculated. We argue that specificity of training interventions could be transferred into corresponding test settings containing properties of SMT and RBT, respectively. The results revealed that i) postural sway was reduced in both intervention groups in all test paradigms; magnitude of changes and effect sizes differed dependent on the paradigm: when training and paradigm coincided most, effects were augmented (P<0.05). ii) These specificities were accompanied by segmental modulations in the amount of CCI, with a greater reduction within the CCI of thigh muscles after RBT compared to the shank muscles after SMT (P<0.05). The results clearly indicate the relationship between test and intervention specificity in balance performance. Hence, specific training modalities of postural control cause multi-segmental and context-specific adaptations, depending upon the characteristics of the trained postural strategy. In relation to fall prevention, perturbation training could serve as an extension to SMT to include the proximal segment, and thus the control of structures near to the body’s centre of mass, into training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5135127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51351272016-12-21 Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training Freyler, Kathrin Krause, Anne Gollhofer, Albert Ritzmann, Ramona PLoS One Research Article Typically, balance training has been used as an intervention paradigm either as static or as reactive balance training. Possible differences in functional outcomes between the two modalities have not been profoundly studied. The objective of the study was to investigate the specificity of neuromuscular adaptations in response to two balance intervention modalities within test and intervention paradigms containing characteristics of both profiles: classical sensorimotor training (SMT) referring to a static ledger pivoting around the ankle joint vs. reactive balance training (RBT) using externally applied perturbations to deteriorate body equilibrium. Thirty-eight subjects were assigned to either SMT or RBT. Before and after four weeks of intervention training, postural sway and electromyographic activities of shank and thigh muscles were recorded and co-contraction indices (CCI) were calculated. We argue that specificity of training interventions could be transferred into corresponding test settings containing properties of SMT and RBT, respectively. The results revealed that i) postural sway was reduced in both intervention groups in all test paradigms; magnitude of changes and effect sizes differed dependent on the paradigm: when training and paradigm coincided most, effects were augmented (P<0.05). ii) These specificities were accompanied by segmental modulations in the amount of CCI, with a greater reduction within the CCI of thigh muscles after RBT compared to the shank muscles after SMT (P<0.05). The results clearly indicate the relationship between test and intervention specificity in balance performance. Hence, specific training modalities of postural control cause multi-segmental and context-specific adaptations, depending upon the characteristics of the trained postural strategy. In relation to fall prevention, perturbation training could serve as an extension to SMT to include the proximal segment, and thus the control of structures near to the body’s centre of mass, into training. Public Library of Science 2016-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5135127/ /pubmed/27911944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167557 Text en © 2016 Freyler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freyler, Kathrin
Krause, Anne
Gollhofer, Albert
Ritzmann, Ramona
Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title_full Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title_fullStr Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title_full_unstemmed Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title_short Specific Stimuli Induce Specific Adaptations: Sensorimotor Training vs. Reactive Balance Training
title_sort specific stimuli induce specific adaptations: sensorimotor training vs. reactive balance training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27911944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167557
work_keys_str_mv AT freylerkathrin specificstimuliinducespecificadaptationssensorimotortrainingvsreactivebalancetraining
AT krauseanne specificstimuliinducespecificadaptationssensorimotortrainingvsreactivebalancetraining
AT gollhoferalbert specificstimuliinducespecificadaptationssensorimotortrainingvsreactivebalancetraining
AT ritzmannramona specificstimuliinducespecificadaptationssensorimotortrainingvsreactivebalancetraining