Cargando…

Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery

PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schallhorn, Steven C, Hannan, Stephen J, Teenan, David, Schallhorn, Julie M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345
_version_ 1782471581165944832
author Schallhorn, Steven C
Hannan, Stephen J
Teenan, David
Schallhorn, Julie M
author_facet Schallhorn, Steven C
Hannan, Stephen J
Teenan, David
Schallhorn, Julie M
author_sort Schallhorn, Steven C
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SETTING: Optical Express, Glasgow, UK. METHODS: Patients treated between October 2015 and June 2016 (3972 LVC and 979 RLE patients) who attended 1-day and 1-month postoperative aftercare and answered a questionnaire were included in this study. All patients had a thorough preoperative discussion with an optometrist, watched a video consent, and were provided with written information. Patients then had a verbal discussion with their treating surgeon either PDOS or on the DOS, according to patient preference. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative visual acuity, refraction, preoperative, 1-day and 1-month postoperative questionnaire were compared between DOS and PDOS patients. Multivariate regression model was developed to find factors associated with patient’s perception of consent quality. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 8.0% of LVC and 17.1% of RLE patients elected to meet their surgeon ahead of the surgery day. In the LVC group, 97.5% of DOS and 97.2% of PDOS patients indicated they were properly consented for surgery (P=0.77). In the RLE group, 97.0% of DOS and 97.0% of PDOS patients stated their consent process for surgery was adequate (P=0.98). There was no statistically significant difference between DOS and PDOS patients in most of the postoperative clinical or questionnaire outcomes. Factors predictive of patient’s satisfaction with consent quality were postoperative satisfaction with vision (46.7% of explained variance), difficulties with night driving, close-up vision or outdoor/sports activities (25.4%), visual phenomena (12.2%), dry eyes (7.5%), and patient’s satisfaction with surgeon’s care (8.2%). CONCLUSION: Perception of quality of consent was comparable between patients that elected to meet the surgeon PDOS, and those who did not.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5135399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51353992016-12-08 Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery Schallhorn, Steven C Hannan, Stephen J Teenan, David Schallhorn, Julie M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SETTING: Optical Express, Glasgow, UK. METHODS: Patients treated between October 2015 and June 2016 (3972 LVC and 979 RLE patients) who attended 1-day and 1-month postoperative aftercare and answered a questionnaire were included in this study. All patients had a thorough preoperative discussion with an optometrist, watched a video consent, and were provided with written information. Patients then had a verbal discussion with their treating surgeon either PDOS or on the DOS, according to patient preference. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative visual acuity, refraction, preoperative, 1-day and 1-month postoperative questionnaire were compared between DOS and PDOS patients. Multivariate regression model was developed to find factors associated with patient’s perception of consent quality. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 8.0% of LVC and 17.1% of RLE patients elected to meet their surgeon ahead of the surgery day. In the LVC group, 97.5% of DOS and 97.2% of PDOS patients indicated they were properly consented for surgery (P=0.77). In the RLE group, 97.0% of DOS and 97.0% of PDOS patients stated their consent process for surgery was adequate (P=0.98). There was no statistically significant difference between DOS and PDOS patients in most of the postoperative clinical or questionnaire outcomes. Factors predictive of patient’s satisfaction with consent quality were postoperative satisfaction with vision (46.7% of explained variance), difficulties with night driving, close-up vision or outdoor/sports activities (25.4%), visual phenomena (12.2%), dry eyes (7.5%), and patient’s satisfaction with surgeon’s care (8.2%). CONCLUSION: Perception of quality of consent was comparable between patients that elected to meet the surgeon PDOS, and those who did not. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5135399/ /pubmed/27932862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345 Text en © 2016 Schallhorn et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schallhorn, Steven C
Hannan, Stephen J
Teenan, David
Schallhorn, Julie M
Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title_full Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title_fullStr Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title_full_unstemmed Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title_short Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
title_sort role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932862
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345
work_keys_str_mv AT schallhornstevenc roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery
AT hannanstephenj roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery
AT teenandavid roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery
AT schallhornjuliem roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery