Cargando…
Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery
PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345 |
_version_ | 1782471581165944832 |
---|---|
author | Schallhorn, Steven C Hannan, Stephen J Teenan, David Schallhorn, Julie M |
author_facet | Schallhorn, Steven C Hannan, Stephen J Teenan, David Schallhorn, Julie M |
author_sort | Schallhorn, Steven C |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SETTING: Optical Express, Glasgow, UK. METHODS: Patients treated between October 2015 and June 2016 (3972 LVC and 979 RLE patients) who attended 1-day and 1-month postoperative aftercare and answered a questionnaire were included in this study. All patients had a thorough preoperative discussion with an optometrist, watched a video consent, and were provided with written information. Patients then had a verbal discussion with their treating surgeon either PDOS or on the DOS, according to patient preference. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative visual acuity, refraction, preoperative, 1-day and 1-month postoperative questionnaire were compared between DOS and PDOS patients. Multivariate regression model was developed to find factors associated with patient’s perception of consent quality. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 8.0% of LVC and 17.1% of RLE patients elected to meet their surgeon ahead of the surgery day. In the LVC group, 97.5% of DOS and 97.2% of PDOS patients indicated they were properly consented for surgery (P=0.77). In the RLE group, 97.0% of DOS and 97.0% of PDOS patients stated their consent process for surgery was adequate (P=0.98). There was no statistically significant difference between DOS and PDOS patients in most of the postoperative clinical or questionnaire outcomes. Factors predictive of patient’s satisfaction with consent quality were postoperative satisfaction with vision (46.7% of explained variance), difficulties with night driving, close-up vision or outdoor/sports activities (25.4%), visual phenomena (12.2%), dry eyes (7.5%), and patient’s satisfaction with surgeon’s care (8.2%). CONCLUSION: Perception of quality of consent was comparable between patients that elected to meet the surgeon PDOS, and those who did not. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5135399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51353992016-12-08 Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery Schallhorn, Steven C Hannan, Stephen J Teenan, David Schallhorn, Julie M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To compare patient’s perception of consent quality, clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after laser vision correction (LVC) and refractive lens exchange (RLE) between patients who met their treating surgeon prior to the day of surgery (PDOS) or on the day of surgery (DOS). DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative case series. SETTING: Optical Express, Glasgow, UK. METHODS: Patients treated between October 2015 and June 2016 (3972 LVC and 979 RLE patients) who attended 1-day and 1-month postoperative aftercare and answered a questionnaire were included in this study. All patients had a thorough preoperative discussion with an optometrist, watched a video consent, and were provided with written information. Patients then had a verbal discussion with their treating surgeon either PDOS or on the DOS, according to patient preference. Preoperative and 1-month postoperative visual acuity, refraction, preoperative, 1-day and 1-month postoperative questionnaire were compared between DOS and PDOS patients. Multivariate regression model was developed to find factors associated with patient’s perception of consent quality. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 8.0% of LVC and 17.1% of RLE patients elected to meet their surgeon ahead of the surgery day. In the LVC group, 97.5% of DOS and 97.2% of PDOS patients indicated they were properly consented for surgery (P=0.77). In the RLE group, 97.0% of DOS and 97.0% of PDOS patients stated their consent process for surgery was adequate (P=0.98). There was no statistically significant difference between DOS and PDOS patients in most of the postoperative clinical or questionnaire outcomes. Factors predictive of patient’s satisfaction with consent quality were postoperative satisfaction with vision (46.7% of explained variance), difficulties with night driving, close-up vision or outdoor/sports activities (25.4%), visual phenomena (12.2%), dry eyes (7.5%), and patient’s satisfaction with surgeon’s care (8.2%). CONCLUSION: Perception of quality of consent was comparable between patients that elected to meet the surgeon PDOS, and those who did not. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5135399/ /pubmed/27932862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345 Text en © 2016 Schallhorn et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schallhorn, Steven C Hannan, Stephen J Teenan, David Schallhorn, Julie M Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title | Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title_full | Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title_fullStr | Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title_short | Role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
title_sort | role of the treating surgeon in the consent process for elective refractive surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932862 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S120345 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schallhornstevenc roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery AT hannanstephenj roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery AT teenandavid roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery AT schallhornjuliem roleofthetreatingsurgeonintheconsentprocessforelectiverefractivesurgery |