Cargando…

Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the anatomical accuracy of navigation technology in localizing defined anatomic landmarks within the orbit with respect to type of technology (optical versus electromagnetic systems) and position of the dynamic reference marker on the skull (vertex, temporal,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Mohammad Javed, Naik, Milind N, Girish, Chetan Mallikarjuniah, Ali, Mohammad Hasnat, Kaliki, Swathi, Dave, Tarjani Vivek, Dendukuri, Gautam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932861
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S118079
_version_ 1782471583619612672
author Ali, Mohammad Javed
Naik, Milind N
Girish, Chetan Mallikarjuniah
Ali, Mohammad Hasnat
Kaliki, Swathi
Dave, Tarjani Vivek
Dendukuri, Gautam
author_facet Ali, Mohammad Javed
Naik, Milind N
Girish, Chetan Mallikarjuniah
Ali, Mohammad Hasnat
Kaliki, Swathi
Dave, Tarjani Vivek
Dendukuri, Gautam
author_sort Ali, Mohammad Javed
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the anatomical accuracy of navigation technology in localizing defined anatomic landmarks within the orbit with respect to type of technology (optical versus electromagnetic systems) and position of the dynamic reference marker on the skull (vertex, temporal, parietal, and mastoid) using in vitro navigation-enabled human skulls. The role of this model as a possible learning tool for anatomicoradiological correlations was also assessed. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on three cadaveric human skulls using the standard image-guidance acquisition protocols. Thirty-five anatomical landmarks were identified for stereotactic navigation using the image-guided StealthStation S7™ in both electromagnetic and optical modes. Three outcome measures studied were accuracy of anatomical localization and its repeatability, comparisons between the electromagnetic and optical modes in assessing radiological accuracy, and the efficacy of dynamic reference frame (DRF) at different locations on the skull. RESULTS: The geometric localization of all the identified anatomical landmarks could be achieved accurately. The Cohen’s kappa agreements between the surgeons were found to be perfect (kappa =0.941) at all predetermined points. There was no difference in anatomical localization between the optical and electromagnetic modes (P≤0.001). Precision for radiological identification did not differ with various positions of the DRF. Skulls with intact anatomical details and careful CT image acquisitions were found to be stereotactically useful. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of anatomic localization within the orbit with navigation technology is equal with optical and electromagnetic system. The location of DRF does not affect the accuracy. Navigation-enabled skull models can be potentially useful as teaching tools for achieving the accurate radiological orientation of orbital and periorbital structures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5135409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51354092016-12-08 Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls Ali, Mohammad Javed Naik, Milind N Girish, Chetan Mallikarjuniah Ali, Mohammad Hasnat Kaliki, Swathi Dave, Tarjani Vivek Dendukuri, Gautam Clin Ophthalmol Original Research AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the anatomical accuracy of navigation technology in localizing defined anatomic landmarks within the orbit with respect to type of technology (optical versus electromagnetic systems) and position of the dynamic reference marker on the skull (vertex, temporal, parietal, and mastoid) using in vitro navigation-enabled human skulls. The role of this model as a possible learning tool for anatomicoradiological correlations was also assessed. METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on three cadaveric human skulls using the standard image-guidance acquisition protocols. Thirty-five anatomical landmarks were identified for stereotactic navigation using the image-guided StealthStation S7™ in both electromagnetic and optical modes. Three outcome measures studied were accuracy of anatomical localization and its repeatability, comparisons between the electromagnetic and optical modes in assessing radiological accuracy, and the efficacy of dynamic reference frame (DRF) at different locations on the skull. RESULTS: The geometric localization of all the identified anatomical landmarks could be achieved accurately. The Cohen’s kappa agreements between the surgeons were found to be perfect (kappa =0.941) at all predetermined points. There was no difference in anatomical localization between the optical and electromagnetic modes (P≤0.001). Precision for radiological identification did not differ with various positions of the DRF. Skulls with intact anatomical details and careful CT image acquisitions were found to be stereotactically useful. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of anatomic localization within the orbit with navigation technology is equal with optical and electromagnetic system. The location of DRF does not affect the accuracy. Navigation-enabled skull models can be potentially useful as teaching tools for achieving the accurate radiological orientation of orbital and periorbital structures. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5135409/ /pubmed/27932861 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S118079 Text en © 2016 Ali et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ali, Mohammad Javed
Naik, Milind N
Girish, Chetan Mallikarjuniah
Ali, Mohammad Hasnat
Kaliki, Swathi
Dave, Tarjani Vivek
Dendukuri, Gautam
Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title_full Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title_fullStr Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title_full_unstemmed Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title_short Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
title_sort interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: assessment of optical versus electromagnetic modes and role of dynamic reference frame location using navigation-enabled human skulls
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932861
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S118079
work_keys_str_mv AT alimohammadjaved interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT naikmilindn interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT girishchetanmallikarjuniah interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT alimohammadhasnat interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT kalikiswathi interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT davetarjanivivek interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls
AT dendukurigautam interactivenavigationguidedophthalmicplasticsurgeryassessmentofopticalversuselectromagneticmodesandroleofdynamicreferenceframelocationusingnavigationenabledhumanskulls