Cargando…

SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. There are excellent outcome and toxicity data for SBRT of peripheral lung tumors. However, the discussion on SBRT for centrally located tumors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roesch, J., Panje, C., Sterzing, F., Mantel, F., Nestle, U., Andratschke, N., Guckenberger, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0732-5
_version_ 1782471613000712192
author Roesch, J.
Panje, C.
Sterzing, F.
Mantel, F.
Nestle, U.
Andratschke, N.
Guckenberger, M.
author_facet Roesch, J.
Panje, C.
Sterzing, F.
Mantel, F.
Nestle, U.
Andratschke, N.
Guckenberger, M.
author_sort Roesch, J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. There are excellent outcome and toxicity data for SBRT of peripheral lung tumors. However, the discussion on SBRT for centrally located tumors is controversial. This study evaluated current clinical practice regarding SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, to identify common fractionation schedules and commonly accepted contraindications for SBRT. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of two parts was introduced at the annual meeting of the DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, representing centers in Germany and Switzerland. The first part of the questionnaire covered general information about the centers, whereas the second part specifically addressed SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, using case examples of nine primary NSCLC patients. Reconstructions of a contrast enhanced CT, as well as PET-Imaging for each case were demonstrated to the participants. RESULTS: Twenty-six centers participated in the meeting. The majority was academic (73%), participated in interdisciplinary thoracic oncology tumorboards (88%) and offered SBRT for lung tumors (96%). Two centers questioned the indication of SBRT for central lung tumors because of lack of evidence. The majority of centers had experience in SBRT for central lung tumors (88%) and half of the centers reported more than ten cases treated during a median period of five years. Most fractionation schedules used PTV encompassing doses of 48–60 Gy in eight fractions with maximum doses of 125–150%. A clear indication for SBRT treatment was seen by more than 85% of centers in three of the nine patients in whom tumors were small and not closer than 2 cm to the main bronchus. Prior pneumonectomy or immediate adjacency to hilar/mediastinal structures were not considered as contraindications for SBRT. In cases where the tumor exceeded 4 cm in diameter or was located closer than 4 cm to the carina 50–80% of centers saw an indication for SBRT. One case, with a 7 cm tumor reaching to the carina would have been treated with SBRT only by one center. CONCLUSION: Within DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, SBRT for small (<4 cm) early stage NSCLC is a common indication, if the minimal distance to the main bronchi is at least 2 cm. The controversy on the treatment of larger and more central tumors will hopefully be solved by ongoing prospective clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5135810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51358102016-12-15 SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central? Roesch, J. Panje, C. Sterzing, F. Mantel, F. Nestle, U. Andratschke, N. Guckenberger, M. Radiat Oncol Research PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. There are excellent outcome and toxicity data for SBRT of peripheral lung tumors. However, the discussion on SBRT for centrally located tumors is controversial. This study evaluated current clinical practice regarding SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, to identify common fractionation schedules and commonly accepted contraindications for SBRT. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of two parts was introduced at the annual meeting of the DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, representing centers in Germany and Switzerland. The first part of the questionnaire covered general information about the centers, whereas the second part specifically addressed SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, using case examples of nine primary NSCLC patients. Reconstructions of a contrast enhanced CT, as well as PET-Imaging for each case were demonstrated to the participants. RESULTS: Twenty-six centers participated in the meeting. The majority was academic (73%), participated in interdisciplinary thoracic oncology tumorboards (88%) and offered SBRT for lung tumors (96%). Two centers questioned the indication of SBRT for central lung tumors because of lack of evidence. The majority of centers had experience in SBRT for central lung tumors (88%) and half of the centers reported more than ten cases treated during a median period of five years. Most fractionation schedules used PTV encompassing doses of 48–60 Gy in eight fractions with maximum doses of 125–150%. A clear indication for SBRT treatment was seen by more than 85% of centers in three of the nine patients in whom tumors were small and not closer than 2 cm to the main bronchus. Prior pneumonectomy or immediate adjacency to hilar/mediastinal structures were not considered as contraindications for SBRT. In cases where the tumor exceeded 4 cm in diameter or was located closer than 4 cm to the carina 50–80% of centers saw an indication for SBRT. One case, with a 7 cm tumor reaching to the carina would have been treated with SBRT only by one center. CONCLUSION: Within DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, SBRT for small (<4 cm) early stage NSCLC is a common indication, if the minimal distance to the main bronchi is at least 2 cm. The controversy on the treatment of larger and more central tumors will hopefully be solved by ongoing prospective clinical trials. BioMed Central 2016-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5135810/ /pubmed/27912764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0732-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Roesch, J.
Panje, C.
Sterzing, F.
Mantel, F.
Nestle, U.
Andratschke, N.
Guckenberger, M.
SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title_full SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title_fullStr SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title_full_unstemmed SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title_short SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC – What is too central?
title_sort sbrt for centrally localized nsclc – what is too central?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27912764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-016-0732-5
work_keys_str_mv AT roeschj sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT panjec sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT sterzingf sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT mantelf sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT nestleu sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT andratschken sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral
AT guckenbergerm sbrtforcentrallylocalizednsclcwhatistoocentral