Cargando…

The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Individuals routinely receive information about their risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) based on traditional risk factors as part of their primary care. We are also able to calculate individual’s risk of CHD based on their genetic information and at present genetic testing for common...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shefer, Guy, Silarova, Barbora, Usher-Smith, Juliet, Griffin, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27914472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2
_version_ 1782471616665485312
author Shefer, Guy
Silarova, Barbora
Usher-Smith, Juliet
Griffin, Simon
author_facet Shefer, Guy
Silarova, Barbora
Usher-Smith, Juliet
Griffin, Simon
author_sort Shefer, Guy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals routinely receive information about their risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) based on traditional risk factors as part of their primary care. We are also able to calculate individual’s risk of CHD based on their genetic information and at present genetic testing for common diseases is available to the public. Due to the limitations in previous studies further understanding is needed about the impact of the risk information on individual’s well-being and health-behaviour. We aimed to explore the short term response to receiving different forms of CHD risk information and lifestyle advice for risk reduction. METHODS: We conducted fourty-one face-to-face interviews and two focus groups across England with participants from the INFORM trial who received a combination of individualised phenotypic and genotypic CHD risk scores and web-based lifestyle advice. Risk scores were presented in different formats, e.g. absolute 10 year risk was presented as a thermometer and expressed as a percentage, natural frequency and ‘heart age’. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ understanding and reaction to the risk scores and attempts to change lifestyle during the intervention. We tape-recorded and transcribed the interviews and focus groups and analysed them using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: limitations of risk scores to generate concern about CHD risk; the advantages of the ‘heart age’ format of risk score presentation in communicating a message of sub-optimal lifestyle; and intentions and attempts to make moderate lifestyle changes which were prompted by the web-based lifestyle advice. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of limitations to the use of risk scores to communicate a message about the need for a lifestyle change. Of the formats used, the ‘heart age’, if noticed, appears to convey the most powerful message about how far from optimal risk an individual person is. An interactive, user friendly, goal setting based lifestyle website can act as a trigger to initiate moderate lifestyle changes, regardless of concerns about risk scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17721237. Registered 12 January 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5135826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51358262016-12-15 The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study Shefer, Guy Silarova, Barbora Usher-Smith, Juliet Griffin, Simon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Individuals routinely receive information about their risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) based on traditional risk factors as part of their primary care. We are also able to calculate individual’s risk of CHD based on their genetic information and at present genetic testing for common diseases is available to the public. Due to the limitations in previous studies further understanding is needed about the impact of the risk information on individual’s well-being and health-behaviour. We aimed to explore the short term response to receiving different forms of CHD risk information and lifestyle advice for risk reduction. METHODS: We conducted fourty-one face-to-face interviews and two focus groups across England with participants from the INFORM trial who received a combination of individualised phenotypic and genotypic CHD risk scores and web-based lifestyle advice. Risk scores were presented in different formats, e.g. absolute 10 year risk was presented as a thermometer and expressed as a percentage, natural frequency and ‘heart age’. Interviews and focus groups explored participants’ understanding and reaction to the risk scores and attempts to change lifestyle during the intervention. We tape-recorded and transcribed the interviews and focus groups and analysed them using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: limitations of risk scores to generate concern about CHD risk; the advantages of the ‘heart age’ format of risk score presentation in communicating a message of sub-optimal lifestyle; and intentions and attempts to make moderate lifestyle changes which were prompted by the web-based lifestyle advice. CONCLUSIONS: There are a number of limitations to the use of risk scores to communicate a message about the need for a lifestyle change. Of the formats used, the ‘heart age’, if noticed, appears to convey the most powerful message about how far from optimal risk an individual person is. An interactive, user friendly, goal setting based lifestyle website can act as a trigger to initiate moderate lifestyle changes, regardless of concerns about risk scores. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN17721237. Registered 12 January 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5135826/ /pubmed/27914472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shefer, Guy
Silarova, Barbora
Usher-Smith, Juliet
Griffin, Simon
The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title_full The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title_fullStr The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title_short The response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
title_sort response to receiving phenotypic and genetic coronary heart disease risk scores and lifestyle advice – a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5135826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27914472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3867-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sheferguy theresponsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT silarovabarbora theresponsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT ushersmithjuliet theresponsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT griffinsimon theresponsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT sheferguy responsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT silarovabarbora responsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT ushersmithjuliet responsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy
AT griffinsimon responsetoreceivingphenotypicandgeneticcoronaryheartdiseaseriskscoresandlifestyleadviceaqualitativestudy