Cargando…

The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: In this study, all single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction surgeries that were done in our university hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torkaman, Ali, Yazdi, Hamidreza, Hosseini, Mohammad Ghorban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994295
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.351-353
_version_ 1782471723298324480
author Torkaman, Ali
Yazdi, Hamidreza
Hosseini, Mohammad Ghorban
author_facet Torkaman, Ali
Yazdi, Hamidreza
Hosseini, Mohammad Ghorban
author_sort Torkaman, Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: In this study, all single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction surgeries that were done in our university hospital from January 2008 to December 2012 were enrolled. All patients were followed at 2,6,12, 24 weeks and 1 a 2 years post operatively. On last follow up all patients were evaluated by clinical examination, KT-1000 and Lysholm questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy five patients were operated using single bundle and eighty five patients with double bundle technique. Fifty seven percent of patients in single bundle and 80% of patients in double bundle group had experienced pain during follow-up period. None of cases had knee extension or flexion loss. The average side to side differences using KT-1000 was 3.5 ± 0.38 (2.9-4.1) millimeters in single bundle group and 3.39 ± 0.39 (2.8-4) millimeters in double bundle group. These results showed no significant difference between two groups (P= 0.31). Lysholm score improved significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: According to this study the clinical results of single bundle ACL reconstruction was similar to double bundle reconstruction in short term follow up. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long term results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5136424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51364242016-12-19 The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature Torkaman, Ali Yazdi, Hamidreza Hosseini, Mohammad Ghorban Med Arch Original Paper OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of single bundle and double bundle surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: In this study, all single bundle and double bundle ACL reconstruction surgeries that were done in our university hospital from January 2008 to December 2012 were enrolled. All patients were followed at 2,6,12, 24 weeks and 1 a 2 years post operatively. On last follow up all patients were evaluated by clinical examination, KT-1000 and Lysholm questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy five patients were operated using single bundle and eighty five patients with double bundle technique. Fifty seven percent of patients in single bundle and 80% of patients in double bundle group had experienced pain during follow-up period. None of cases had knee extension or flexion loss. The average side to side differences using KT-1000 was 3.5 ± 0.38 (2.9-4.1) millimeters in single bundle group and 3.39 ± 0.39 (2.8-4) millimeters in double bundle group. These results showed no significant difference between two groups (P= 0.31). Lysholm score improved significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: According to this study the clinical results of single bundle ACL reconstruction was similar to double bundle reconstruction in short term follow up. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long term results. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-10 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5136424/ /pubmed/27994295 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.351-353 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Ali Torkaman, Hamidreza Yazdi, Mohammad Ghorban Hosseini http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Torkaman, Ali
Yazdi, Hamidreza
Hosseini, Mohammad Ghorban
The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title_full The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title_fullStr The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title_short The Results of Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction Surgery, a Retrospective Study and Review of Literature
title_sort results of single bundle versus double bundle acl reconstruction surgery, a retrospective study and review of literature
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994295
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.351-353
work_keys_str_mv AT torkamanali theresultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature
AT yazdihamidreza theresultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature
AT hosseinimohammadghorban theresultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature
AT torkamanali resultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature
AT yazdihamidreza resultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature
AT hosseinimohammadghorban resultsofsinglebundleversusdoublebundleaclreconstructionsurgeryaretrospectivestudyandreviewofliterature