Cargando…

Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on reducing kidney injury and myocardial damage after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Ischaemic preconditioning of a remote organ reduces ischaemia-reperfusion injury of kidney and myocardium after CAB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud, Baradari, Afshin Gholipour, Jazayeri, Asieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994300
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.373-378
_version_ 1782471726684176384
author Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
Jazayeri, Asieh
author_facet Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
Jazayeri, Asieh
author_sort Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on reducing kidney injury and myocardial damage after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Ischaemic preconditioning of a remote organ reduces ischaemia-reperfusion injury of kidney and myocardium after CABG. METHOD: To reduce myocardial damage and kidney injury by applying Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning we recruited 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. We applied three cycles of lower limb tourniquet, inflated its cuff for 5 minutes in study group or left un-inflated (sham or control group) before the procedure. The primary outcome was serum creatinine, creatinine clearance and troponin-I Levels at time 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Secondary outcomes were serum C-reactive protein, inotrope score, ventilation time and ICU stay. Data’s were analyzed by MedCalc (MedCalc Software bvba, Acacialaan, Belgium). We compared the two group by student t test, chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: The two groups were not statistically different in terms of age, gender, smoking habits, drug use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. This study showed a higher CRP level in study group comparing with control group (P=0.003), creatinine clearance was slightly higher in study group specially 24 h after procedure but was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Troponin-I level was significantly lower in study group (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a lower Troponin-I level in study group which suggest a cardio-myocyte protective function of RIPC. It also showed slightly lower Creatinine clearance in control group, gap between two group increases significantly 24 hours after procedure which may suggest a potential kidney protection by RIPC. Serum CRP level was higher in study group. A multi-center randomized controlled trial with a longer time for creatinine clearance measurement may show the potential effectiveness of this non-invasive inexpensive intervention on reducing kidney injury after CABG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5136438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51364382016-12-19 Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud Baradari, Afshin Gholipour Jazayeri, Asieh Med Arch Original Paper OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy of remote ischaemic preconditioning on reducing kidney injury and myocardial damage after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). BACKGROUND: Ischaemic preconditioning of a remote organ reduces ischaemia-reperfusion injury of kidney and myocardium after CABG. METHOD: To reduce myocardial damage and kidney injury by applying Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning we recruited 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. We applied three cycles of lower limb tourniquet, inflated its cuff for 5 minutes in study group or left un-inflated (sham or control group) before the procedure. The primary outcome was serum creatinine, creatinine clearance and troponin-I Levels at time 0, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h. Secondary outcomes were serum C-reactive protein, inotrope score, ventilation time and ICU stay. Data’s were analyzed by MedCalc (MedCalc Software bvba, Acacialaan, Belgium). We compared the two group by student t test, chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: The two groups were not statistically different in terms of age, gender, smoking habits, drug use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. This study showed a higher CRP level in study group comparing with control group (P=0.003), creatinine clearance was slightly higher in study group specially 24 h after procedure but was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Troponin-I level was significantly lower in study group (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a lower Troponin-I level in study group which suggest a cardio-myocyte protective function of RIPC. It also showed slightly lower Creatinine clearance in control group, gap between two group increases significantly 24 hours after procedure which may suggest a potential kidney protection by RIPC. Serum CRP level was higher in study group. A multi-center randomized controlled trial with a longer time for creatinine clearance measurement may show the potential effectiveness of this non-invasive inexpensive intervention on reducing kidney injury after CABG. AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2016-10 2016-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5136438/ /pubmed/27994300 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.373-378 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Seyed Mahmoud Nouraei, Afshin Gholipour Baradari and Asieh Jazayeri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Nouraei, Seyed Mahmoud
Baradari, Afshin Gholipour
Jazayeri, Asieh
Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Does Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning Protect Kidney and Cardiomyocytes After Coronary Revascularization? A Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort does remote ischaemic preconditioning protect kidney and cardiomyocytes after coronary revascularization? a double blind controlled clinical trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994300
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2016.70.373-378
work_keys_str_mv AT nouraeiseyedmahmoud doesremoteischaemicpreconditioningprotectkidneyandcardiomyocytesaftercoronaryrevascularizationadoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT baradariafshingholipour doesremoteischaemicpreconditioningprotectkidneyandcardiomyocytesaftercoronaryrevascularizationadoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT jazayeriasieh doesremoteischaemicpreconditioningprotectkidneyandcardiomyocytesaftercoronaryrevascularizationadoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial