Cargando…

Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy

PURPOSE: Rapid revascularization in emergent large vessel occlusion with endovascular embolectomy has proven clinical benefit. We sought to measure device–clot interaction as a potential mechanism for efficient embolectomy. METHODS: Two different radiopaque clot models were injected to create a midd...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Marel, Kajo, Chueh, Ju-Yu, Brooks, Olivia W, King, Robert M, Marosfoi, Miklos G, Langan, Erin T, Carniato, Sarena L, Gounis, Matthew J, Nogueira, Raul G, Puri, Ajit S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012209
_version_ 1782471767250436096
author van der Marel, Kajo
Chueh, Ju-Yu
Brooks, Olivia W
King, Robert M
Marosfoi, Miklos G
Langan, Erin T
Carniato, Sarena L
Gounis, Matthew J
Nogueira, Raul G
Puri, Ajit S
author_facet van der Marel, Kajo
Chueh, Ju-Yu
Brooks, Olivia W
King, Robert M
Marosfoi, Miklos G
Langan, Erin T
Carniato, Sarena L
Gounis, Matthew J
Nogueira, Raul G
Puri, Ajit S
author_sort van der Marel, Kajo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Rapid revascularization in emergent large vessel occlusion with endovascular embolectomy has proven clinical benefit. We sought to measure device–clot interaction as a potential mechanism for efficient embolectomy. METHODS: Two different radiopaque clot models were injected to create a middle cerebral artery occlusion in a patient-specific vascular phantom. A radiopaque stent retriever was deployed within the clot by unsheathing the device or a combination of unsheathing followed by pushing the device (n=8/group). High-resolution cone beam CT was performed immediately after device deployment and repeated after 5 min. An image processing pipeline was created to quantitatively evaluate the volume of clot that integrates with the stent, termed the clot integration factor (CIF). RESULTS: The CIF was significantly different for the two deployment variations when the device engaged the hard clot (p=0.041), but not the soft clot (p=0.764). In the hard clot, CIF increased significantly between post-deployment and final imaging datasets when using the pushing technique (p=0.019), but not when using the unsheathing technique (p=0.067). When we investigated the effect of time on CIF in the different clot models disregarding the technique, the CIF was significantly increased in the final dataset relative to the post-deployment dataset in both clot models (p=0.004–0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates in an in vitro system the benefit of pushing the Trevo stent during device delivery in hard clot to enhance integration. Regardless of delivery technique, clot–device integration increased in both clot models by waiting 5 min.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5136713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51367132016-12-08 Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy van der Marel, Kajo Chueh, Ju-Yu Brooks, Olivia W King, Robert M Marosfoi, Miklos G Langan, Erin T Carniato, Sarena L Gounis, Matthew J Nogueira, Raul G Puri, Ajit S J Neurointerv Surg Basic Science PURPOSE: Rapid revascularization in emergent large vessel occlusion with endovascular embolectomy has proven clinical benefit. We sought to measure device–clot interaction as a potential mechanism for efficient embolectomy. METHODS: Two different radiopaque clot models were injected to create a middle cerebral artery occlusion in a patient-specific vascular phantom. A radiopaque stent retriever was deployed within the clot by unsheathing the device or a combination of unsheathing followed by pushing the device (n=8/group). High-resolution cone beam CT was performed immediately after device deployment and repeated after 5 min. An image processing pipeline was created to quantitatively evaluate the volume of clot that integrates with the stent, termed the clot integration factor (CIF). RESULTS: The CIF was significantly different for the two deployment variations when the device engaged the hard clot (p=0.041), but not the soft clot (p=0.764). In the hard clot, CIF increased significantly between post-deployment and final imaging datasets when using the pushing technique (p=0.019), but not when using the unsheathing technique (p=0.067). When we investigated the effect of time on CIF in the different clot models disregarding the technique, the CIF was significantly increased in the final dataset relative to the post-deployment dataset in both clot models (p=0.004–0.007). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates in an in vitro system the benefit of pushing the Trevo stent during device delivery in hard clot to enhance integration. Regardless of delivery technique, clot–device integration increased in both clot models by waiting 5 min. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5136713/ /pubmed/26833539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012209 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Basic Science
van der Marel, Kajo
Chueh, Ju-Yu
Brooks, Olivia W
King, Robert M
Marosfoi, Miklos G
Langan, Erin T
Carniato, Sarena L
Gounis, Matthew J
Nogueira, Raul G
Puri, Ajit S
Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title_full Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title_fullStr Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title_short Quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
title_sort quantitative assessment of device–clot interaction for stent retriever thrombectomy
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5136713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26833539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012209
work_keys_str_mv AT vandermarelkajo quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT chuehjuyu quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT brooksoliviaw quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT kingrobertm quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT marosfoimiklosg quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT langanerint quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT carniatosarenal quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT gounismatthewj quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT nogueiraraulg quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy
AT puriajits quantitativeassessmentofdeviceclotinteractionforstentretrieverthrombectomy