Cargando…
A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit
INTRODUCTION: Postoperative wound infections have been responsible for increasing morbidity and are associated with an increased use of hospital resources. Previous studies have identified several risk factors. However, most studies are outdated, and few relate to the era of enhanced recovery and la...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Surgeons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24417828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588414X13824511650137 |
_version_ | 1782471957145452544 |
---|---|
author | Power, K Davies, MM Hargest, R Phillips, S Torkington, J Morris, C |
author_facet | Power, K Davies, MM Hargest, R Phillips, S Torkington, J Morris, C |
author_sort | Power, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Postoperative wound infections have been responsible for increasing morbidity and are associated with an increased use of hospital resources. Previous studies have identified several risk factors. However, most studies are outdated, and few relate to the era of enhanced recovery and laparoscopic surgery. This study investigated the association between patient and operative factors and the development of postoperative wound infections in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients with documented wound infections or dehiscences were identified from a database of elective and emergency colorectal surgery. Patients with wound infections were matched by operation type to a control group of colorectal patients. Differences in patient and operative factors between case and control group were analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients with wound infection were identified from 647 operations (8.6%). Fifty-seven per cent were emergency operations and eighty-eight per cent were performed as open surgery or as laparoscopic surgery converted to open. Forty per cent of patients had high ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grades (3 or 4). Multivariate logistical regression showed that obese patients and those having open surgery had the highest risk of infections. The median postoperative hospital stay for patients with wound infections was twice as long as for those patients without wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery and obesity are independent risk factor for wound infections. An increase in laparoscopically performed operations and new strategies for managing wounds in obese patients may help to reduce the rate of wound infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5137653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Royal College of Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51376532016-12-20 A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit Power, K Davies, MM Hargest, R Phillips, S Torkington, J Morris, C Ann R Coll Surg Engl Colorectal INTRODUCTION: Postoperative wound infections have been responsible for increasing morbidity and are associated with an increased use of hospital resources. Previous studies have identified several risk factors. However, most studies are outdated, and few relate to the era of enhanced recovery and laparoscopic surgery. This study investigated the association between patient and operative factors and the development of postoperative wound infections in colorectal surgery. METHODS: Patients with documented wound infections or dehiscences were identified from a database of elective and emergency colorectal surgery. Patients with wound infections were matched by operation type to a control group of colorectal patients. Differences in patient and operative factors between case and control group were analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients with wound infection were identified from 647 operations (8.6%). Fifty-seven per cent were emergency operations and eighty-eight per cent were performed as open surgery or as laparoscopic surgery converted to open. Forty per cent of patients had high ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grades (3 or 4). Multivariate logistical regression showed that obese patients and those having open surgery had the highest risk of infections. The median postoperative hospital stay for patients with wound infections was twice as long as for those patients without wound infections. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery and obesity are independent risk factor for wound infections. An increase in laparoscopically performed operations and new strategies for managing wounds in obese patients may help to reduce the rate of wound infection. Royal College of Surgeons 2014-01 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5137653/ /pubmed/24417828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588414X13824511650137 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Colorectal Power, K Davies, MM Hargest, R Phillips, S Torkington, J Morris, C A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title | A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title_full | A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title_fullStr | A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title_full_unstemmed | A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title_short | A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
title_sort | case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit |
topic | Colorectal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5137653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24417828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588414X13824511650137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT powerk acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT daviesmm acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT hargestr acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT phillipss acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT torkingtonj acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT morrisc acasecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT powerk casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT daviesmm casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT hargestr casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT phillipss casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT torkingtonj casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit AT morrisc casecontrolstudyofriskfactorsforwoundinfectioninacolorectalunit |