Cargando…

Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data are commonly used to simultaneously analyse correlated data in single study cases. Synthesis of evidence from multiple studies using meta-analysis is a natural next step but its feasibility depends heavily on the standard of reporting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sudell, Maria, Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi, Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5139124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0272-6
_version_ 1782472188820979712
author Sudell, Maria
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
author_facet Sudell, Maria
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
author_sort Sudell, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data are commonly used to simultaneously analyse correlated data in single study cases. Synthesis of evidence from multiple studies using meta-analysis is a natural next step but its feasibility depends heavily on the standard of reporting of joint models in the medical literature. During this review we aim to assess the current standard of reporting of joint models applied in the literature, and to determine whether current reporting standards would allow or hinder future aggregate data meta-analyses of model results. METHODS: We undertook a literature review of non-methodological studies that involved joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event medical data. Study characteristics were extracted and an assessment of whether separate meta-analyses for longitudinal, time-to-event and association parameters were possible was made. RESULTS: The 65 studies identified used a wide range of joint modelling methods in a selection of software. Identified studies concerned a variety of disease areas. The majority of studies reported adequate information to conduct a meta-analysis (67.7% for longitudinal parameter aggregate data meta-analysis, 69.2% for time-to-event parameter aggregate data meta-analysis, 76.9% for association parameter aggregate data meta-analysis). In some cases model structure was difficult to ascertain from the published reports. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst extraction of sufficient information to permit meta-analyses was possible in a majority of cases, the standard of reporting of joint models should be maintained and improved. Recommendations for future practice include clear statement of model structure, of values of estimated parameters, of software used and of statistical methods applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0272-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5139124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51391242016-12-15 Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis Sudell, Maria Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi Tudur-Smith, Catrin BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data are commonly used to simultaneously analyse correlated data in single study cases. Synthesis of evidence from multiple studies using meta-analysis is a natural next step but its feasibility depends heavily on the standard of reporting of joint models in the medical literature. During this review we aim to assess the current standard of reporting of joint models applied in the literature, and to determine whether current reporting standards would allow or hinder future aggregate data meta-analyses of model results. METHODS: We undertook a literature review of non-methodological studies that involved joint modelling of longitudinal and time-to-event medical data. Study characteristics were extracted and an assessment of whether separate meta-analyses for longitudinal, time-to-event and association parameters were possible was made. RESULTS: The 65 studies identified used a wide range of joint modelling methods in a selection of software. Identified studies concerned a variety of disease areas. The majority of studies reported adequate information to conduct a meta-analysis (67.7% for longitudinal parameter aggregate data meta-analysis, 69.2% for time-to-event parameter aggregate data meta-analysis, 76.9% for association parameter aggregate data meta-analysis). In some cases model structure was difficult to ascertain from the published reports. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst extraction of sufficient information to permit meta-analyses was possible in a majority of cases, the standard of reporting of joint models should be maintained and improved. Recommendations for future practice include clear statement of model structure, of values of estimated parameters, of software used and of statistical methods applied. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0272-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5139124/ /pubmed/27919221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0272-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sudell, Maria
Kolamunnage-Dona, Ruwanthi
Tudur-Smith, Catrin
Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title_full Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title_fullStr Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title_short Joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
title_sort joint models for longitudinal and time-to-event data: a review of reporting quality with a view to meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5139124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0272-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sudellmaria jointmodelsforlongitudinalandtimetoeventdataareviewofreportingqualitywithaviewtometaanalysis
AT kolamunnagedonaruwanthi jointmodelsforlongitudinalandtimetoeventdataareviewofreportingqualitywithaviewtometaanalysis
AT tudursmithcatrin jointmodelsforlongitudinalandtimetoeventdataareviewofreportingqualitywithaviewtometaanalysis