Cargando…

HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act

HLA matching provides numerous benefits in organ transplantation including better graft function, fewer rejection episodes, longer graft survival, and the possibility of reduced immunosuppression. Mismatches are attended by more frequent rejection episodes that require increased immunosuppression th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zachary, Andrea A., Leffell, Mary S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00575
_version_ 1782472574881497088
author Zachary, Andrea A.
Leffell, Mary S.
author_facet Zachary, Andrea A.
Leffell, Mary S.
author_sort Zachary, Andrea A.
collection PubMed
description HLA matching provides numerous benefits in organ transplantation including better graft function, fewer rejection episodes, longer graft survival, and the possibility of reduced immunosuppression. Mismatches are attended by more frequent rejection episodes that require increased immunosuppression that, in turn, can increase the risk of infection and malignancy. HLA mismatches also incur the risk of sensitization, which can reduce the opportunity and increase waiting time for a subsequent transplant. However, other factors such as donor age, donor type, and immunosuppression protocol, can affect the benefit derived from matching. Furthermore, finding a well-matched donor may not be possible for all patients and usually prolongs waiting time. Strategies to optimize transplantation for patients without a well-matched donor should take into account the immunologic barrier represented by different mismatches: what are the least immunogenic mismatches considering the patient’s HLA phenotype; should repeated mismatches be avoided; is the patient sensitized to HLA and, if so, what are the strengths of the patient’s antibodies? This information can then be used to define the HLA type of an immunologically optimal donor and the probability of such a donor occurring. A probability that is considered to be too low may require expanding the donor population through paired donation or modifying what is acceptable, which may require employing treatment to overcome immunologic barriers such as increased immunosuppression or desensitization. Thus, transplantation must strike a balance between the risk associated with waiting for the optimal donor and the risk associated with a less than optimal donor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5141243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51412432016-12-21 HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act Zachary, Andrea A. Leffell, Mary S. Front Immunol Immunology HLA matching provides numerous benefits in organ transplantation including better graft function, fewer rejection episodes, longer graft survival, and the possibility of reduced immunosuppression. Mismatches are attended by more frequent rejection episodes that require increased immunosuppression that, in turn, can increase the risk of infection and malignancy. HLA mismatches also incur the risk of sensitization, which can reduce the opportunity and increase waiting time for a subsequent transplant. However, other factors such as donor age, donor type, and immunosuppression protocol, can affect the benefit derived from matching. Furthermore, finding a well-matched donor may not be possible for all patients and usually prolongs waiting time. Strategies to optimize transplantation for patients without a well-matched donor should take into account the immunologic barrier represented by different mismatches: what are the least immunogenic mismatches considering the patient’s HLA phenotype; should repeated mismatches be avoided; is the patient sensitized to HLA and, if so, what are the strengths of the patient’s antibodies? This information can then be used to define the HLA type of an immunologically optimal donor and the probability of such a donor occurring. A probability that is considered to be too low may require expanding the donor population through paired donation or modifying what is acceptable, which may require employing treatment to overcome immunologic barriers such as increased immunosuppression or desensitization. Thus, transplantation must strike a balance between the risk associated with waiting for the optimal donor and the risk associated with a less than optimal donor. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5141243/ /pubmed/28003816 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00575 Text en Copyright © 2016 Zachary and Leffell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Zachary, Andrea A.
Leffell, Mary S.
HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title_full HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title_fullStr HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title_full_unstemmed HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title_short HLA Mismatching Strategies for Solid Organ Transplantation – A Balancing Act
title_sort hla mismatching strategies for solid organ transplantation – a balancing act
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003816
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00575
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharyandreaa hlamismatchingstrategiesforsolidorgantransplantationabalancingact
AT leffellmarys hlamismatchingstrategiesforsolidorgantransplantationabalancingact