Cargando…
The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27999787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061 |
_version_ | 1782472587514740736 |
---|---|
author | Kociszewski, Jacek Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Tomasik, Paweł Horosz, Edyta Kuszka, Andrzej Barcz, Ewa |
author_facet | Kociszewski, Jacek Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Tomasik, Paweł Horosz, Edyta Kuszka, Andrzej Barcz, Ewa |
author_sort | Kociszewski, Jacek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of repeat MUS surgery in patients after excision of the sling with recurrent SUI. We compared its effectiveness with uncomplicated cases treated with TVT. 27 patients who underwent the repeated MUS and 50 consecutive patients after primary TVT were enrolled in the study. After 6 months, we have found that 24 (88.46%) patients from repeat sling group and 48 (96%) patients after primary sling were dry (1-hour pad test, 2 g or less). The difference between groups was not significant. We showed statistically significant improvement of quality of life in both groups. In conclusion, we showed that repeated sling after MUS excision is almost as effective as primary MUS. We postulate that sling excision and repeated MUS may be the best option for persistent SUI and/or complications after MUS procedures. Further multicenter observations are ongoing as to provide results on bigger group of cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5141316 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51413162016-12-20 The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study Kociszewski, Jacek Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Tomasik, Paweł Horosz, Edyta Kuszka, Andrzej Barcz, Ewa Biomed Res Int Research Article Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of repeat MUS surgery in patients after excision of the sling with recurrent SUI. We compared its effectiveness with uncomplicated cases treated with TVT. 27 patients who underwent the repeated MUS and 50 consecutive patients after primary TVT were enrolled in the study. After 6 months, we have found that 24 (88.46%) patients from repeat sling group and 48 (96%) patients after primary sling were dry (1-hour pad test, 2 g or less). The difference between groups was not significant. We showed statistically significant improvement of quality of life in both groups. In conclusion, we showed that repeated sling after MUS excision is almost as effective as primary MUS. We postulate that sling excision and repeated MUS may be the best option for persistent SUI and/or complications after MUS procedures. Further multicenter observations are ongoing as to provide results on bigger group of cases. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5141316/ /pubmed/27999787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jacek Kociszewski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kociszewski, Jacek Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Tomasik, Paweł Horosz, Edyta Kuszka, Andrzej Barcz, Ewa The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title | The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title_full | The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title_fullStr | The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title_short | The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study |
title_sort | outcome of repeated mid urethral sling in sui treatment after vaginal excisions of primary failed sling: preliminary study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141316/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27999787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kociszewskijacek theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT majkusiakwojciech theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT pomianandrzej theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT tomasikpaweł theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT horoszedyta theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT kuszkaandrzej theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT barczewa theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT kociszewskijacek outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT majkusiakwojciech outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT pomianandrzej outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT tomasikpaweł outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT horoszedyta outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT kuszkaandrzej outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy AT barczewa outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy |