Cargando…

The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study

Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kociszewski, Jacek, Majkusiak, Wojciech, Pomian, Andrzej, Tomasik, Paweł, Horosz, Edyta, Kuszka, Andrzej, Barcz, Ewa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27999787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061
_version_ 1782472587514740736
author Kociszewski, Jacek
Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Tomasik, Paweł
Horosz, Edyta
Kuszka, Andrzej
Barcz, Ewa
author_facet Kociszewski, Jacek
Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Tomasik, Paweł
Horosz, Edyta
Kuszka, Andrzej
Barcz, Ewa
author_sort Kociszewski, Jacek
collection PubMed
description Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of repeat MUS surgery in patients after excision of the sling with recurrent SUI. We compared its effectiveness with uncomplicated cases treated with TVT. 27 patients who underwent the repeated MUS and 50 consecutive patients after primary TVT were enrolled in the study. After 6 months, we have found that 24 (88.46%) patients from repeat sling group and 48 (96%) patients after primary sling were dry (1-hour pad test, 2 g or less). The difference between groups was not significant. We showed statistically significant improvement of quality of life in both groups. In conclusion, we showed that repeated sling after MUS excision is almost as effective as primary MUS. We postulate that sling excision and repeated MUS may be the best option for persistent SUI and/or complications after MUS procedures. Further multicenter observations are ongoing as to provide results on bigger group of cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5141316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51413162016-12-20 The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study Kociszewski, Jacek Majkusiak, Wojciech Pomian, Andrzej Tomasik, Paweł Horosz, Edyta Kuszka, Andrzej Barcz, Ewa Biomed Res Int Research Article Mid urethral sling is the standard in SUI treatment. Nevertheless, the risk of reoperation reaches 9%. There is no consensus as to the best treatment option for complications. A question is raised: what is the optimal way to achieve the best result in patients after primary failure? The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of repeat MUS surgery in patients after excision of the sling with recurrent SUI. We compared its effectiveness with uncomplicated cases treated with TVT. 27 patients who underwent the repeated MUS and 50 consecutive patients after primary TVT were enrolled in the study. After 6 months, we have found that 24 (88.46%) patients from repeat sling group and 48 (96%) patients after primary sling were dry (1-hour pad test, 2 g or less). The difference between groups was not significant. We showed statistically significant improvement of quality of life in both groups. In conclusion, we showed that repeated sling after MUS excision is almost as effective as primary MUS. We postulate that sling excision and repeated MUS may be the best option for persistent SUI and/or complications after MUS procedures. Further multicenter observations are ongoing as to provide results on bigger group of cases. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5141316/ /pubmed/27999787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jacek Kociszewski et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kociszewski, Jacek
Majkusiak, Wojciech
Pomian, Andrzej
Tomasik, Paweł
Horosz, Edyta
Kuszka, Andrzej
Barcz, Ewa
The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title_full The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title_fullStr The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title_short The Outcome of Repeated Mid Urethral Sling in SUI Treatment after Vaginal Excisions of Primary Failed Sling: Preliminary Study
title_sort outcome of repeated mid urethral sling in sui treatment after vaginal excisions of primary failed sling: preliminary study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27999787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1242061
work_keys_str_mv AT kociszewskijacek theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT majkusiakwojciech theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT pomianandrzej theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT tomasikpaweł theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT horoszedyta theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT kuszkaandrzej theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT barczewa theoutcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT kociszewskijacek outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT majkusiakwojciech outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT pomianandrzej outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT tomasikpaweł outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT horoszedyta outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT kuszkaandrzej outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy
AT barczewa outcomeofrepeatedmidurethralslinginsuitreatmentaftervaginalexcisionsofprimaryfailedslingpreliminarystudy