Cargando…

Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence

When quantum computing becomes a wide-spread commercial reality, Quantum Search Algorithms (QSA) and especially Grover’s QSA will inevitably be one of their main applications, constituting their cornerstone. Most of the literature assumes that the quantum circuits are free from decoherence. Practica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Botsinis, Panagiotis, Babar, Zunaira, Alanis, Dimitrios, Chandra, Daryus, Nguyen, Hung, Ng, Soon Xin, Hanzo, Lajos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27924865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38095
_version_ 1782472617114992640
author Botsinis, Panagiotis
Babar, Zunaira
Alanis, Dimitrios
Chandra, Daryus
Nguyen, Hung
Ng, Soon Xin
Hanzo, Lajos
author_facet Botsinis, Panagiotis
Babar, Zunaira
Alanis, Dimitrios
Chandra, Daryus
Nguyen, Hung
Ng, Soon Xin
Hanzo, Lajos
author_sort Botsinis, Panagiotis
collection PubMed
description When quantum computing becomes a wide-spread commercial reality, Quantum Search Algorithms (QSA) and especially Grover’s QSA will inevitably be one of their main applications, constituting their cornerstone. Most of the literature assumes that the quantum circuits are free from decoherence. Practically, decoherence will remain unavoidable as is the Gaussian noise of classic circuits imposed by the Brownian motion of electrons, hence it may have to be mitigated. In this contribution, we investigate the effect of quantum noise on the performance of QSAs, in terms of their success probability as a function of the database size to be searched, when decoherence is modelled by depolarizing channels’ deleterious effects imposed on the quantum gates. Moreover, we employ quantum error correction codes for limiting the effects of quantum noise and for correcting quantum flips. More specifically, we demonstrate that, when we search for a single solution in a database having 4096 entries using Grover’s QSA at an aggressive depolarizing probability of 10(−3), the success probability of the search is 0.22 when no quantum coding is used, which is improved to 0.96 when Steane’s quantum error correction code is employed. Finally, apart from Steane’s code, the employment of Quantum Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (QBCH) codes is also considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5141447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51414472016-12-16 Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence Botsinis, Panagiotis Babar, Zunaira Alanis, Dimitrios Chandra, Daryus Nguyen, Hung Ng, Soon Xin Hanzo, Lajos Sci Rep Article When quantum computing becomes a wide-spread commercial reality, Quantum Search Algorithms (QSA) and especially Grover’s QSA will inevitably be one of their main applications, constituting their cornerstone. Most of the literature assumes that the quantum circuits are free from decoherence. Practically, decoherence will remain unavoidable as is the Gaussian noise of classic circuits imposed by the Brownian motion of electrons, hence it may have to be mitigated. In this contribution, we investigate the effect of quantum noise on the performance of QSAs, in terms of their success probability as a function of the database size to be searched, when decoherence is modelled by depolarizing channels’ deleterious effects imposed on the quantum gates. Moreover, we employ quantum error correction codes for limiting the effects of quantum noise and for correcting quantum flips. More specifically, we demonstrate that, when we search for a single solution in a database having 4096 entries using Grover’s QSA at an aggressive depolarizing probability of 10(−3), the success probability of the search is 0.22 when no quantum coding is used, which is improved to 0.96 when Steane’s quantum error correction code is employed. Finally, apart from Steane’s code, the employment of Quantum Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (QBCH) codes is also considered. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5141447/ /pubmed/27924865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38095 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Botsinis, Panagiotis
Babar, Zunaira
Alanis, Dimitrios
Chandra, Daryus
Nguyen, Hung
Ng, Soon Xin
Hanzo, Lajos
Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title_full Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title_fullStr Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title_full_unstemmed Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title_short Quantum Error Correction Protects Quantum Search Algorithms Against Decoherence
title_sort quantum error correction protects quantum search algorithms against decoherence
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27924865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38095
work_keys_str_mv AT botsinispanagiotis quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT babarzunaira quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT alanisdimitrios quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT chandradaryus quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT nguyenhung quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT ngsoonxin quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence
AT hanzolajos quantumerrorcorrectionprotectsquantumsearchalgorithmsagainstdecoherence