Cargando…

Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession indicates oral display of the root surface due to apical movement of gingival margin. Coronally advanced flap (CAF) is often used periodontal plastic surgical technique to accomplish root coverage. The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khobragade, Sumedh, Kolte, Abhay, Kolte, Rajashri, Shrirao, Tushar, Potey, Anushree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994426
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.194121
_version_ 1782472659095781376
author Khobragade, Sumedh
Kolte, Abhay
Kolte, Rajashri
Shrirao, Tushar
Potey, Anushree
author_facet Khobragade, Sumedh
Kolte, Abhay
Kolte, Rajashri
Shrirao, Tushar
Potey, Anushree
author_sort Khobragade, Sumedh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gingival recession indicates oral display of the root surface due to apical movement of gingival margin. Coronally advanced flap (CAF) is often used periodontal plastic surgical technique to accomplish root coverage. The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the effectiveness of modified CAF with orthodontic button application (CAF+B) and without orthodontic button application (CAF) for the correction of multiple recession defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients exhibiting bilateral multiple proximate Millers Class I and/or Class II gingival recession defects were included in the study. Each set of proximate recession defects was designated randomly to test or control group. Control group was treated by CAF alone and test group by CAF+B. Baseline and postoperative clinical parameters at 2, 4, and 6 months time interval were recorded. RESULTS: Mean root coverage percentage from baseline to 6 months in control group was 78.30% ± 20.75% and in test group was 92.23% ± 15.6%. Complete root coverage was 43.8% in control group and 77.47% in test group. Visual analog scale pain measurements did not reveal any difference among both the groups. Patient satisfaction with esthetics was very high in CAF+B group when compared with CAF group. CONCLUSION: Both treatment modalities, i.e., CAF and CAF+B are effectual in the treatment of proximate Miller's Class I and Class II gingival recession defects, but CAF+B showed significantly superior clinical results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5141673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51416732016-12-19 Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial Khobragade, Sumedh Kolte, Abhay Kolte, Rajashri Shrirao, Tushar Potey, Anushree Contemp Clin Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession indicates oral display of the root surface due to apical movement of gingival margin. Coronally advanced flap (CAF) is often used periodontal plastic surgical technique to accomplish root coverage. The purpose of this clinical trial is to assess and compare the effectiveness of modified CAF with orthodontic button application (CAF+B) and without orthodontic button application (CAF) for the correction of multiple recession defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients exhibiting bilateral multiple proximate Millers Class I and/or Class II gingival recession defects were included in the study. Each set of proximate recession defects was designated randomly to test or control group. Control group was treated by CAF alone and test group by CAF+B. Baseline and postoperative clinical parameters at 2, 4, and 6 months time interval were recorded. RESULTS: Mean root coverage percentage from baseline to 6 months in control group was 78.30% ± 20.75% and in test group was 92.23% ± 15.6%. Complete root coverage was 43.8% in control group and 77.47% in test group. Visual analog scale pain measurements did not reveal any difference among both the groups. Patient satisfaction with esthetics was very high in CAF+B group when compared with CAF group. CONCLUSION: Both treatment modalities, i.e., CAF and CAF+B are effectual in the treatment of proximate Miller's Class I and Class II gingival recession defects, but CAF+B showed significantly superior clinical results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5141673/ /pubmed/27994426 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.194121 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khobragade, Sumedh
Kolte, Abhay
Kolte, Rajashri
Shrirao, Tushar
Potey, Anushree
Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort modified coronally advanced flap with and without orthodontic button application in management of multiple proximate gingival recession defects: a randomized clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994426
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.194121
work_keys_str_mv AT khobragadesumedh modifiedcoronallyadvancedflapwithandwithoutorthodonticbuttonapplicationinmanagementofmultipleproximategingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kolteabhay modifiedcoronallyadvancedflapwithandwithoutorthodonticbuttonapplicationinmanagementofmultipleproximategingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kolterajashri modifiedcoronallyadvancedflapwithandwithoutorthodonticbuttonapplicationinmanagementofmultipleproximategingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT shriraotushar modifiedcoronallyadvancedflapwithandwithoutorthodonticbuttonapplicationinmanagementofmultipleproximategingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT poteyanushree modifiedcoronallyadvancedflapwithandwithoutorthodonticbuttonapplicationinmanagementofmultipleproximategingivalrecessiondefectsarandomizedclinicaltrial