Cargando…
A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites
The structure of the mask stimulus is crucial in backward masking studies and we recently demonstrated such an effect when masking faces. Specifically, we showed that activity of the amygdala is increased to fearful facial expressions masked with neutral faces and decreased to fearful expressions ma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw110 |
_version_ | 1782472710607077376 |
---|---|
author | Kim, M. Justin Solomon, Kimberly M. Neta, Maital Davis, F. Caroline Oler, Jonathan A. Mazzulla, Emily C. Whalen, Paul J. |
author_facet | Kim, M. Justin Solomon, Kimberly M. Neta, Maital Davis, F. Caroline Oler, Jonathan A. Mazzulla, Emily C. Whalen, Paul J. |
author_sort | Kim, M. Justin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The structure of the mask stimulus is crucial in backward masking studies and we recently demonstrated such an effect when masking faces. Specifically, we showed that activity of the amygdala is increased to fearful facial expressions masked with neutral faces and decreased to fearful expressions masked with a pattern mask—but critically both masked conditions discriminated fearful expressions from happy expressions. Given this finding, we sought to test whether masked fearful eye whites would produce a similar profile of amygdala response in a face vs non-face context. During functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning sessions, 30 participants viewed fearful or happy eye whites masked with either neutral faces or pattern images. Results indicated amygdala activity was increased to fearful vs happy eye whites in the face mask condition, but decreased to fearful vs happy eye whites in the pattern mask condition—effectively replicating and expanding our previous report. Our data support the idea that the amygdala is responsive to fearful eye whites, but that the nature of this activity observed in a backward masking design depends on the mask stimulus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5141961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51419612016-12-08 A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites Kim, M. Justin Solomon, Kimberly M. Neta, Maital Davis, F. Caroline Oler, Jonathan A. Mazzulla, Emily C. Whalen, Paul J. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles The structure of the mask stimulus is crucial in backward masking studies and we recently demonstrated such an effect when masking faces. Specifically, we showed that activity of the amygdala is increased to fearful facial expressions masked with neutral faces and decreased to fearful expressions masked with a pattern mask—but critically both masked conditions discriminated fearful expressions from happy expressions. Given this finding, we sought to test whether masked fearful eye whites would produce a similar profile of amygdala response in a face vs non-face context. During functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning sessions, 30 participants viewed fearful or happy eye whites masked with either neutral faces or pattern images. Results indicated amygdala activity was increased to fearful vs happy eye whites in the face mask condition, but decreased to fearful vs happy eye whites in the pattern mask condition—effectively replicating and expanding our previous report. Our data support the idea that the amygdala is responsive to fearful eye whites, but that the nature of this activity observed in a backward masking design depends on the mask stimulus. Oxford University Press 2016-12 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5141961/ /pubmed/27521301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw110 Text en © The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kim, M. Justin Solomon, Kimberly M. Neta, Maital Davis, F. Caroline Oler, Jonathan A. Mazzulla, Emily C. Whalen, Paul J. A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title | A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title_full | A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title_fullStr | A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title_full_unstemmed | A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title_short | A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
title_sort | face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5141961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27521301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw110 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimmjustin afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT solomonkimberlym afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT netamaital afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT davisfcaroline afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT olerjonathana afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT mazzullaemilyc afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT whalenpaulj afaceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT kimmjustin faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT solomonkimberlym faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT netamaital faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT davisfcaroline faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT olerjonathana faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT mazzullaemilyc faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites AT whalenpaulj faceversusnonfacecontextinfluencesamygdalaresponsestomaskedfearfuleyewhites |