Cargando…

A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis

ChIP-seq has become a widely adopted genomic assay in recent years to determine binding sites for transcription factors or enrichments for specific histone modifications. Beside detection of enriched or bound regions, an important question is to determine differences between conditions. While this i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steinhauser, Sebastian, Kurzawa, Nils, Eils, Roland, Herrmann, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbv110
_version_ 1782472718606663680
author Steinhauser, Sebastian
Kurzawa, Nils
Eils, Roland
Herrmann, Carl
author_facet Steinhauser, Sebastian
Kurzawa, Nils
Eils, Roland
Herrmann, Carl
author_sort Steinhauser, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description ChIP-seq has become a widely adopted genomic assay in recent years to determine binding sites for transcription factors or enrichments for specific histone modifications. Beside detection of enriched or bound regions, an important question is to determine differences between conditions. While this is a common analysis for gene expression, for which a large number of computational approaches have been validated, the same question for ChIP-seq is particularly challenging owing to the complexity of ChIP-seq data in terms of noisiness and variability. Many different tools have been developed and published in recent years. However, a comprehensive comparison and review of these tools is still missing. Here, we have reviewed 14 tools, which have been developed to determine differential enrichment between two conditions. They differ in their algorithmic setups, and also in the range of applicability. Hence, we have benchmarked these tools on real data sets for transcription factors and histone modifications, as well as on simulated data sets to quantitatively evaluate their performance. Overall, there is a great variety in the type of signal detected by these tools with a surprisingly low level of agreement. Depending on the type of analysis performed, the choice of method will crucially impact the outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51420152016-12-08 A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis Steinhauser, Sebastian Kurzawa, Nils Eils, Roland Herrmann, Carl Brief Bioinform Software Review ChIP-seq has become a widely adopted genomic assay in recent years to determine binding sites for transcription factors or enrichments for specific histone modifications. Beside detection of enriched or bound regions, an important question is to determine differences between conditions. While this is a common analysis for gene expression, for which a large number of computational approaches have been validated, the same question for ChIP-seq is particularly challenging owing to the complexity of ChIP-seq data in terms of noisiness and variability. Many different tools have been developed and published in recent years. However, a comprehensive comparison and review of these tools is still missing. Here, we have reviewed 14 tools, which have been developed to determine differential enrichment between two conditions. They differ in their algorithmic setups, and also in the range of applicability. Hence, we have benchmarked these tools on real data sets for transcription factors and histone modifications, as well as on simulated data sets to quantitatively evaluate their performance. Overall, there is a great variety in the type of signal detected by these tools with a surprisingly low level of agreement. Depending on the type of analysis performed, the choice of method will crucially impact the outcome. Oxford University Press 2016-11 2016-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5142015/ /pubmed/26764273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbv110 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Software Review
Steinhauser, Sebastian
Kurzawa, Nils
Eils, Roland
Herrmann, Carl
A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title_full A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title_fullStr A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title_short A comprehensive comparison of tools for differential ChIP-seq analysis
title_sort comprehensive comparison of tools for differential chip-seq analysis
topic Software Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbv110
work_keys_str_mv AT steinhausersebastian acomprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT kurzawanils acomprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT eilsroland acomprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT herrmanncarl acomprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT steinhausersebastian comprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT kurzawanils comprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT eilsroland comprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis
AT herrmanncarl comprehensivecomparisonoftoolsfordifferentialchipseqanalysis