Cargando…
Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011
BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Brazil represents a significant public health issue. This issue has raised awareness among health authorities regarding the quality of condoms. In Brazil, male condoms need to be certified. The certification process eva...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0254-5 |
_version_ | 1782472735376539648 |
---|---|
author | Duarte, Janete Teixeira de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio C. C. de Mello Pereira Abrantes, Shirley |
author_facet | Duarte, Janete Teixeira de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio C. C. de Mello Pereira Abrantes, Shirley |
author_sort | Duarte, Janete Teixeira |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Brazil represents a significant public health issue. This issue has raised awareness among health authorities regarding the quality of condoms. In Brazil, male condoms need to be certified. The certification process evaluates in detail the manufacturing and quality of the final product; however, post-market surveillance is not part of the normal certification practice. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, we evaluated 20 male condoms brands per lot of 8 manufactures-both domestic and imported-marketed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sampling was performed per ISO 2859–1, and the condoms were evaluated on length, width, thickness, holes, integrity of primary packaging, bursting volume, bursting pressure, label and secondary packaging, following the criteria established in the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008. RESULTS: Of the 20 evaluated brands, 17 brands were found to be noncompliant with the guidelines of the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008 in at least one of the analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS: Any nonconforming unit has serious public health implications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5142156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51421562016-12-15 Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 Duarte, Janete Teixeira de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio C. C. de Mello Pereira Abrantes, Shirley Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: The increased incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Brazil represents a significant public health issue. This issue has raised awareness among health authorities regarding the quality of condoms. In Brazil, male condoms need to be certified. The certification process evaluates in detail the manufacturing and quality of the final product; however, post-market surveillance is not part of the normal certification practice. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, we evaluated 20 male condoms brands per lot of 8 manufactures-both domestic and imported-marketed in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sampling was performed per ISO 2859–1, and the condoms were evaluated on length, width, thickness, holes, integrity of primary packaging, bursting volume, bursting pressure, label and secondary packaging, following the criteria established in the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008. RESULTS: Of the 20 evaluated brands, 17 brands were found to be noncompliant with the guidelines of the Brazilian National Health Oversight Agency Resolution no. RDC 62/2008 in at least one of the analyses performed. CONCLUSIONS: Any nonconforming unit has serious public health implications. BioMed Central 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142156/ /pubmed/27923380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0254-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Duarte, Janete Teixeira de Almeida, Antonio Eugenio C. C. de Mello Pereira Abrantes, Shirley Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title | Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title_full | Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title_fullStr | Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title_short | Quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2009–2011 |
title_sort | quality evaluation of commercially available male condoms in rio de janeiro, brazil, 2009–2011 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0254-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duartejaneteteixeira qualityevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemalecondomsinriodejaneirobrazil20092011 AT dealmeidaantonioeugeniocc qualityevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemalecondomsinriodejaneirobrazil20092011 AT demellopereiraabrantesshirley qualityevaluationofcommerciallyavailablemalecondomsinriodejaneirobrazil20092011 |