Cargando…

Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages

BACKGROUND: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite’s evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia, Ibarra-Cerdeña, Carlos N., Moo-Llanes, David A., Ramsey, Janine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2
_version_ 1782472737676066816
author Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia
Ibarra-Cerdeña, Carlos N.
Moo-Llanes, David A.
Ramsey, Janine M.
author_facet Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia
Ibarra-Cerdeña, Carlos N.
Moo-Llanes, David A.
Ramsey, Janine M.
author_sort Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite’s evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. METHODS: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. RESULTS: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. CONCLUSIONS: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51421752016-12-15 Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia Ibarra-Cerdeña, Carlos N. Moo-Llanes, David A. Ramsey, Janine M. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The evolutionary history and ecological associations of Trypanosoma cruzi, the need to identify genetic markers that can distinguish parasite subpopulations, and understanding the parasite’s evolutionary and selective processes have been the subject of a significant number of publications since 1998, the year when the first DNA sequence analysis for the species was published. METHODS: The current analysis systematizes and re-analyzes this original research, focusing on critical methodological and analytical variables and results that have given rise to interpretations of putative patterns of genetic diversity and diversification of T. cruzi lineages, discrete typing units (DTUs), and populations, and their associations with hosts, vectors, and geographical distribution that have been interpreted as evidence for parasite subpopulation specificities. RESULTS: Few studies use hypothesis-driven or quantitative analysis for T. cruzi phylogeny (16/58 studies) or phylogeography (10/13). Among these, only one phylogenetic and five phylogeographic studies analyzed molecular markers directly from tissues (i.e. not from isolates). Analysis of T. cruzi DTU or lineage niche and its geographical projection demonstrate extensive sympatry among all clades across the continent and no significant niche differences among DTUs. DTU beta-diversity was high, indicating diverse host assemblages across regions, while host dissimilarity was principally due to host species turnover and to a much lesser degree to nestedness. DTU-host order specificities appear related to trophic or microenvironmental interactions. CONCLUSIONS: More rigorous study designs and analyses will be required to discern evolutionary processes and the impact of landscape modification on population dynamics and risk for T. cruzi transmission to humans. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142175/ /pubmed/27923409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Izeta-Alberdi, Amaia
Ibarra-Cerdeña, Carlos N.
Moo-Llanes, David A.
Ramsey, Janine M.
Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_full Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_fullStr Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_full_unstemmed Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_short Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages
title_sort geographical, landscape and host associations of trypanosoma cruzi dtus and lineages
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27923409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1918-2
work_keys_str_mv AT izetaalberdiamaia geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT ibarracerdenacarlosn geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT moollanesdavida geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages
AT ramseyjaninem geographicallandscapeandhostassociationsoftrypanosomacruzidtusandlineages