Cargando…

The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols

BACKGROUND: It is important that planned randomised trials are justified and placed in the context of the available evidence. The SPIRIT guidelines for reporting clinical trial protocols recommend that a recent and relevant systematic review should be included. The aim of this study was to assess th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pandis, Nikolaos, Fleming, Padhraig S., Koletsi, Despina, Hopewell, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6
_version_ 1782472749160071168
author Pandis, Nikolaos
Fleming, Padhraig S.
Koletsi, Despina
Hopewell, Sally
author_facet Pandis, Nikolaos
Fleming, Padhraig S.
Koletsi, Despina
Hopewell, Sally
author_sort Pandis, Nikolaos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is important that planned randomised trials are justified and placed in the context of the available evidence. The SPIRIT guidelines for reporting clinical trial protocols recommend that a recent and relevant systematic review should be included. The aim of this study was to assess the use of the existing evidence in order to justify trial conduct. METHODS: Protocols of randomised trials published over a 1-month period (December 2015) indexed in PubMed were obtained. Data on trial characteristics relating to location, design, funding, conflict of interest and type of evidence included for trial justification was extracted in duplicate and independently by two investigators. The frequency of citation of previous research including relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 101 protocols for RCTs were identified. Most proposed trials were parallel-group (n = 74; 73.3%). Reference to an earlier systematic review with additional randomised trials was found in 9.9% (n = 10) of protocols and without additional trials in 30.7% (n = 31), while reference was made to randomised trials in isolation in 21.8% (n = 22). Explicit justification for the proposed randomised trial on the basis of being the first to address the research question was made in 17.8% (n = 18) of protocols. A randomised controlled trial was not cited in 10.9% (95% CI: 5.6, 18.7) (n = 11), while in 8.9% (95% CI: 4.2, 16.2) (n = 9) of the protocols a systematic review was cited but did not inform trial design. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively high percentage of protocols of randomised trials involves prior citation of randomised trials, systematic reviews or both. However, improvements are required to ensure that it is explicit that clinical trials are justified and shaped by contemporary best evidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51423182016-12-15 The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols Pandis, Nikolaos Fleming, Padhraig S. Koletsi, Despina Hopewell, Sally Trials Research BACKGROUND: It is important that planned randomised trials are justified and placed in the context of the available evidence. The SPIRIT guidelines for reporting clinical trial protocols recommend that a recent and relevant systematic review should be included. The aim of this study was to assess the use of the existing evidence in order to justify trial conduct. METHODS: Protocols of randomised trials published over a 1-month period (December 2015) indexed in PubMed were obtained. Data on trial characteristics relating to location, design, funding, conflict of interest and type of evidence included for trial justification was extracted in duplicate and independently by two investigators. The frequency of citation of previous research including relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials was assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 101 protocols for RCTs were identified. Most proposed trials were parallel-group (n = 74; 73.3%). Reference to an earlier systematic review with additional randomised trials was found in 9.9% (n = 10) of protocols and without additional trials in 30.7% (n = 31), while reference was made to randomised trials in isolation in 21.8% (n = 22). Explicit justification for the proposed randomised trial on the basis of being the first to address the research question was made in 17.8% (n = 18) of protocols. A randomised controlled trial was not cited in 10.9% (95% CI: 5.6, 18.7) (n = 11), while in 8.9% (95% CI: 4.2, 16.2) (n = 9) of the protocols a systematic review was cited but did not inform trial design. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively high percentage of protocols of randomised trials involves prior citation of randomised trials, systematic reviews or both. However, improvements are required to ensure that it is explicit that clinical trials are justified and shaped by contemporary best evidence. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142318/ /pubmed/27927219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pandis, Nikolaos
Fleming, Padhraig S.
Koletsi, Despina
Hopewell, Sally
The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title_full The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title_fullStr The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title_full_unstemmed The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title_short The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
title_sort citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1713-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pandisnikolaos thecitationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT flemingpadhraigs thecitationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT koletsidespina thecitationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT hopewellsally thecitationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT pandisnikolaos citationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT flemingpadhraigs citationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT koletsidespina citationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols
AT hopewellsally citationofrelevantsystematicreviewsandrandomisedtrialsinpublishedreportsoftrialprotocols