Cargando…

Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures associated with total knee replacement are increasing in incidence. We hypothesized that a standardized management protocol would result in few implant failures and a low rate of postoperative complications. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Wade R., Stoneback, Jason W., Morgan, Steven J., Stahel, Philip F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0114-9
_version_ 1782472755009028096
author Smith, Wade R.
Stoneback, Jason W.
Morgan, Steven J.
Stahel, Philip F.
author_facet Smith, Wade R.
Stoneback, Jason W.
Morgan, Steven J.
Stahel, Philip F.
author_sort Smith, Wade R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures associated with total knee replacement are increasing in incidence. We hypothesized that a standardized management protocol would result in few implant failures and a low rate of postoperative complications. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study at an urban level 1 trauma center and academic level 2 trauma center. Consecutive patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and stable total knee arthroplasty were included between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Patients were managed by a standardized protocol of co-management by a hospitalist service, fracture fixation within 24 h of admission by less-invasive locked bridge plating, and immediate unrestricted postoperative weight bearing. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included time to surgery, intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, time to full weight bearing, and time to radiographic fracture healing. RESULTS: Fifty four fractures were treated in 52 patients. There were three implant failures, one deep infection, one nonunion and two patients with symptomatic malunion. One patient had knee pain due to patellar component instability associated with valgus alignment. There were ten thromboembolic complications despite consistent anticoagulation. Two patients died within 12 months of injury. Thirty-eight patients had returned to their pre-injury ambulation status at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach of less-invasive locked plating fixation and immediate unrestricted weight bearing appears safe and feasible in the management of this vulnerable patient cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This is a retrospective observational study without a Trial registration number.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51423432016-12-15 Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients Smith, Wade R. Stoneback, Jason W. Morgan, Steven J. Stahel, Philip F. Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures associated with total knee replacement are increasing in incidence. We hypothesized that a standardized management protocol would result in few implant failures and a low rate of postoperative complications. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study at an urban level 1 trauma center and academic level 2 trauma center. Consecutive patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and stable total knee arthroplasty were included between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014. Patients were managed by a standardized protocol of co-management by a hospitalist service, fracture fixation within 24 h of admission by less-invasive locked bridge plating, and immediate unrestricted postoperative weight bearing. The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative complications. Secondary outcome measures included time to surgery, intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, time to full weight bearing, and time to radiographic fracture healing. RESULTS: Fifty four fractures were treated in 52 patients. There were three implant failures, one deep infection, one nonunion and two patients with symptomatic malunion. One patient had knee pain due to patellar component instability associated with valgus alignment. There were ten thromboembolic complications despite consistent anticoagulation. Two patients died within 12 months of injury. Thirty-eight patients had returned to their pre-injury ambulation status at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: A standardized approach of less-invasive locked plating fixation and immediate unrestricted weight bearing appears safe and feasible in the management of this vulnerable patient cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This is a retrospective observational study without a Trial registration number. BioMed Central 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142343/ /pubmed/27980675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0114-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, Wade R.
Stoneback, Jason W.
Morgan, Steven J.
Stahel, Philip F.
Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title_full Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title_fullStr Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title_full_unstemmed Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title_short Is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? A feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
title_sort is immediate weight bearing safe for periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by locked plating? a feasibility study in 52 consecutive patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-016-0114-9
work_keys_str_mv AT smithwader isimmediateweightbearingsafeforperiprostheticdistalfemurfracturestreatedbylockedplatingafeasibilitystudyin52consecutivepatients
AT stonebackjasonw isimmediateweightbearingsafeforperiprostheticdistalfemurfracturestreatedbylockedplatingafeasibilitystudyin52consecutivepatients
AT morganstevenj isimmediateweightbearingsafeforperiprostheticdistalfemurfracturestreatedbylockedplatingafeasibilitystudyin52consecutivepatients
AT stahelphilipf isimmediateweightbearingsafeforperiprostheticdistalfemurfracturestreatedbylockedplatingafeasibilitystudyin52consecutivepatients