Cargando…
A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb
BACKGROUND: Podiatrists routinely perform non-invasive lower limb vascular assessment, however frequently cite time as a major barrier in performing regular assessment. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based vascular assessment method to guide podiatrists’ decision-making processes t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0181-2 |
_version_ | 1782472766961745920 |
---|---|
author | Tehan, Peta Ellen Chuter, Vivienne Helaine |
author_facet | Tehan, Peta Ellen Chuter, Vivienne Helaine |
author_sort | Tehan, Peta Ellen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Podiatrists routinely perform non-invasive lower limb vascular assessment, however frequently cite time as a major barrier in performing regular assessment. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based vascular assessment method to guide podiatrists’ decision-making processes to aid in timely vascular assessment in at risk populations. METHOD: The sample underwent brachial pressure measurement, ankle pressures, toe pressure and Doppler waveform with colour duplex ultrasound (CFDU) used as the reference standard. Both the targeted screening method and the American Heart Association (AHA) guideline for vascular screening were then applied to the data set and sensitivity and specificity of each method was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen participants were included. Sensitivity of the targeted screening method (62%, 95% CI 47.17–75.35) was higher than the AHA method (49%, 95% CI 34.75–63.40), however, specificity of the AHA method (94%, 95% CI 85.62–98.37) was higher than the targeted screening method (85%, 95% CI 74.26–92.60). Diagnostic accuracy was similar with the AHA method yielding 74% diagnostic accuracy and the targeted screening method 73%. CONCLUSION: The targeted screening method and the broad international guideline demonstrated similar accuracy, however clinicians may save time using the targeted screening method. This study highlights the difficulties in obtaining accuracy in lower limb vascular assessment in general. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5142395 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51423952016-12-15 A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb Tehan, Peta Ellen Chuter, Vivienne Helaine J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Podiatrists routinely perform non-invasive lower limb vascular assessment, however frequently cite time as a major barrier in performing regular assessment. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based vascular assessment method to guide podiatrists’ decision-making processes to aid in timely vascular assessment in at risk populations. METHOD: The sample underwent brachial pressure measurement, ankle pressures, toe pressure and Doppler waveform with colour duplex ultrasound (CFDU) used as the reference standard. Both the targeted screening method and the American Heart Association (AHA) guideline for vascular screening were then applied to the data set and sensitivity and specificity of each method was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen participants were included. Sensitivity of the targeted screening method (62%, 95% CI 47.17–75.35) was higher than the AHA method (49%, 95% CI 34.75–63.40), however, specificity of the AHA method (94%, 95% CI 85.62–98.37) was higher than the targeted screening method (85%, 95% CI 74.26–92.60). Diagnostic accuracy was similar with the AHA method yielding 74% diagnostic accuracy and the targeted screening method 73%. CONCLUSION: The targeted screening method and the broad international guideline demonstrated similar accuracy, however clinicians may save time using the targeted screening method. This study highlights the difficulties in obtaining accuracy in lower limb vascular assessment in general. BioMed Central 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142395/ /pubmed/27980685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0181-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tehan, Peta Ellen Chuter, Vivienne Helaine A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title | A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title_full | A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title_fullStr | A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title_full_unstemmed | A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title_short | A targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
title_sort | targeted screening method for non-invasive vascular assessment of the lower limb |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142395/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27980685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-016-0181-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tehanpetaellen atargetedscreeningmethodfornoninvasivevascularassessmentofthelowerlimb AT chuterviviennehelaine atargetedscreeningmethodfornoninvasivevascularassessmentofthelowerlimb AT tehanpetaellen targetedscreeningmethodfornoninvasivevascularassessmentofthelowerlimb AT chuterviviennehelaine targetedscreeningmethodfornoninvasivevascularassessmentofthelowerlimb |