Cargando…

Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Tzu-Yen, Lee, Yao-Chou, Lin, You-Cheng, Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze, Hsueh, Yuan-Yu, Kuo, Yao-Lung, Shieh, Shyh-Jou, Lee, Jing-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27975015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099
_version_ 1782472781943799808
author Chang, Tzu-Yen
Lee, Yao-Chou
Lin, You-Cheng
Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze
Hsueh, Yuan-Yu
Kuo, Yao-Lung
Shieh, Shyh-Jou
Lee, Jing-Wei
author_facet Chang, Tzu-Yen
Lee, Yao-Chou
Lin, You-Cheng
Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze
Hsueh, Yuan-Yu
Kuo, Yao-Lung
Shieh, Shyh-Jou
Lee, Jing-Wei
author_sort Chang, Tzu-Yen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16–2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. CONCLUSION: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51424812016-12-14 Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Chang, Tzu-Yen Lee, Yao-Chou Lin, You-Cheng Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze Hsueh, Yuan-Yu Kuo, Yao-Lung Shieh, Shyh-Jou Lee, Jing-Wei Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16–2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. CONCLUSION: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5142481/ /pubmed/27975015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chang, Tzu-Yen
Lee, Yao-Chou
Lin, You-Cheng
Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze
Hsueh, Yuan-Yu
Kuo, Yao-Lung
Shieh, Shyh-Jou
Lee, Jing-Wei
Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort implantable doppler probes for postoperatively monitoring free flaps: efficacy. a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27975015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099
work_keys_str_mv AT changtzuyen implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeyaochou implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linyoucheng implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wongstanleythiansze implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hsuehyuanyu implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kuoyaolung implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shiehshyhjou implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leejingwei implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis