Cargando…
Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27975015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099 |
_version_ | 1782472781943799808 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Tzu-Yen Lee, Yao-Chou Lin, You-Cheng Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze Hsueh, Yuan-Yu Kuo, Yao-Lung Shieh, Shyh-Jou Lee, Jing-Wei |
author_facet | Chang, Tzu-Yen Lee, Yao-Chou Lin, You-Cheng Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze Hsueh, Yuan-Yu Kuo, Yao-Lung Shieh, Shyh-Jou Lee, Jing-Wei |
author_sort | Chang, Tzu-Yen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16–2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. CONCLUSION: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5142481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51424812016-12-14 Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Chang, Tzu-Yen Lee, Yao-Chou Lin, You-Cheng Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze Hsueh, Yuan-Yu Kuo, Yao-Lung Shieh, Shyh-Jou Lee, Jing-Wei Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Although clinical assessment remains the gold standard for monitoring the circulation of free flaps, several adjunct techniques promote timely salvage by detecting circulation compromise early. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of an implantable Doppler probe for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: English-language articles evaluating the efficacy of implantable Doppler probes compared with clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps were analyzed. The outcome measures were total flap failure rates, salvage rates, sensitivity, false-positive rates, and positive likelihood ratios. RESULTS: Of the 504 citations identified, 6 comparative studies were included for meta-analysis. An implantable Doppler probe significantly lowered the flap failure rate (risk ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.21–0.75) and raised the successful salvage rate (risk ratio: 1.73; 95% confidence interval: 1.16–2.59). Pooled sensitivity was higher (1.00 vs 0.98), the positive likelihood ratio was lower (72.16 vs 220.48), and the false-positive rate was higher (0.01 vs 0) in the implantable Doppler probe group than in the clinical assessment group. CONCLUSION: An implantable Doppler probe is significantly more efficacious than clinical assessment for postoperatively monitoring free flaps. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5142481/ /pubmed/27975015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chang, Tzu-Yen Lee, Yao-Chou Lin, You-Cheng Wong, Stanley Thian-Sze Hsueh, Yuan-Yu Kuo, Yao-Lung Shieh, Shyh-Jou Lee, Jing-Wei Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title | Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | implantable doppler probes for postoperatively monitoring free flaps: efficacy. a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27975015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001099 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changtzuyen implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leeyaochou implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT linyoucheng implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wongstanleythiansze implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hsuehyuanyu implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kuoyaolung implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shiehshyhjou implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT leejingwei implantabledopplerprobesforpostoperativelymonitoringfreeflapsefficacyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |