Cargando…

Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies

BACKGROUND: There is renewed interest in effective measures to control Zika and dengue vectors. A synthesis of published literature with a focus on the quality of evidence is warranted to determine the effectiveness of vector control strategies. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a meta-review assessing the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouzid, Maha, Brainard, Julii, Hooper, Lee, Hunter, Paul R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27926934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005176
_version_ 1782472823945560064
author Bouzid, Maha
Brainard, Julii
Hooper, Lee
Hunter, Paul R.
author_facet Bouzid, Maha
Brainard, Julii
Hooper, Lee
Hunter, Paul R.
author_sort Bouzid, Maha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is renewed interest in effective measures to control Zika and dengue vectors. A synthesis of published literature with a focus on the quality of evidence is warranted to determine the effectiveness of vector control strategies. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a meta-review assessing the effectiveness of any Aedes control measure. We searched Scopus and Medline for relevant reviews through to May 2016. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed independently for inclusion by two authors. Data extraction was performed in duplicate and validity of the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. FINDINGS: 13 systematic reviews that investigated the effect of control measures on entomological parameters or disease incidence were included. Biological controls seem to achieve better reduction of entomological indices than chemical controls, while educational campaigns can reduce breeding habitats. Integrated vector control strategies may not always increase effectiveness. The efficacy of any control programme is dependent on local settings, intervention type, resources and study duration, which may partly explain the varying degree of success between studies. Nevertheless, the quality of evidence was mostly low to very low due to poor reporting of study design, observational methodologies, heterogeneity, and indirect outcomes, thus hindering an evidence-based recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the effectiveness of Aedes control measures is mixed. Chemical control, which is commonly used, does not appear to be associated with sustainable reductions of mosquito populations over time. Indeed, by contributing to a false sense of security, chemical control may reduce the effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at encouraging local people to remove mosquito breeding sites. Better quality studies of the impact of vector control interventions on the incidence of human infections with Dengue or Zika are still needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5142773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51427732016-12-22 Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies Bouzid, Maha Brainard, Julii Hooper, Lee Hunter, Paul R. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: There is renewed interest in effective measures to control Zika and dengue vectors. A synthesis of published literature with a focus on the quality of evidence is warranted to determine the effectiveness of vector control strategies. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a meta-review assessing the effectiveness of any Aedes control measure. We searched Scopus and Medline for relevant reviews through to May 2016. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed independently for inclusion by two authors. Data extraction was performed in duplicate and validity of the evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria. FINDINGS: 13 systematic reviews that investigated the effect of control measures on entomological parameters or disease incidence were included. Biological controls seem to achieve better reduction of entomological indices than chemical controls, while educational campaigns can reduce breeding habitats. Integrated vector control strategies may not always increase effectiveness. The efficacy of any control programme is dependent on local settings, intervention type, resources and study duration, which may partly explain the varying degree of success between studies. Nevertheless, the quality of evidence was mostly low to very low due to poor reporting of study design, observational methodologies, heterogeneity, and indirect outcomes, thus hindering an evidence-based recommendation. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the effectiveness of Aedes control measures is mixed. Chemical control, which is commonly used, does not appear to be associated with sustainable reductions of mosquito populations over time. Indeed, by contributing to a false sense of security, chemical control may reduce the effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at encouraging local people to remove mosquito breeding sites. Better quality studies of the impact of vector control interventions on the incidence of human infections with Dengue or Zika are still needed. Public Library of Science 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5142773/ /pubmed/27926934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005176 Text en © 2016 Bouzid et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouzid, Maha
Brainard, Julii
Hooper, Lee
Hunter, Paul R.
Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title_full Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title_fullStr Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title_short Public Health Interventions for Aedes Control in the Time of Zikavirus– A Meta-Review on Effectiveness of Vector Control Strategies
title_sort public health interventions for aedes control in the time of zikavirus– a meta-review on effectiveness of vector control strategies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27926934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005176
work_keys_str_mv AT bouzidmaha publichealthinterventionsforaedescontrolinthetimeofzikavirusametareviewoneffectivenessofvectorcontrolstrategies
AT brainardjulii publichealthinterventionsforaedescontrolinthetimeofzikavirusametareviewoneffectivenessofvectorcontrolstrategies
AT hooperlee publichealthinterventionsforaedescontrolinthetimeofzikavirusametareviewoneffectivenessofvectorcontrolstrategies
AT hunterpaulr publichealthinterventionsforaedescontrolinthetimeofzikavirusametareviewoneffectivenessofvectorcontrolstrategies