Cargando…

Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and identify clinico-pathological variables that influenced survival. METHODS: Patients with bilobar CRLM were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database during the study period (January 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Carlo, Sara, Yeung, Derek, Mills, Jamie, Zaitoun, Abed, Cameron, Iain, Gomez, Dhanny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i34.1502
_version_ 1782472938829643776
author Di Carlo, Sara
Yeung, Derek
Mills, Jamie
Zaitoun, Abed
Cameron, Iain
Gomez, Dhanny
author_facet Di Carlo, Sara
Yeung, Derek
Mills, Jamie
Zaitoun, Abed
Cameron, Iain
Gomez, Dhanny
author_sort Di Carlo, Sara
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and identify clinico-pathological variables that influenced survival. METHODS: Patients with bilobar CRLM were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database during the study period (January 2010-June 2014). Collated data included demographics, primary tumour treatment, surgical data, histopathology analysis and clinical outcome. Down-staging therapy included Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan- based regimens, and Cetuximab was also used in patients that were K-RAS wild-type. Response to neo-adjuvant therapy was assessed at the multi-disciplinary team meeting and considered for surgery if all macroscopic CRLM were resectable with a clear margin while preserving sufficient liver parenchyma. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients included, thirty-two (23.5%) patients were considered inoperable and referred for palliative chemotherapy, and thirty-four (25%) patients underwent liver resection. Seventy (51.4%) patients underwent down-staging therapy, of which 37 (52.8%) patients responded sufficiently to undergo liver resection. Patients that failed to respond to down-staging therapy (n = 33, 47.1%) were referred for palliative therapy. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the three groups (surgery vs down-staging therapy vs inoperable disease, P < 0.001). All patients that underwent hepatic resection, including patients that had down-staging therapy, had a significantly better overall survival compared to patients that were inoperable (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, only resection margin significantly influenced disease-free survival (P = 0.017). On multi-variate analysis, R0 resection (P = 0.030) and female (P = 0.036) gender significantly influenced overall survival. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing liver resection with bilobar CRLM have a significantly better survival outcome. R0 resection is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in this patient group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5143431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51434312016-12-22 Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases Di Carlo, Sara Yeung, Derek Mills, Jamie Zaitoun, Abed Cameron, Iain Gomez, Dhanny World J Hepatol Retrospective Study AIM: To evaluate the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and identify clinico-pathological variables that influenced survival. METHODS: Patients with bilobar CRLM were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database during the study period (January 2010-June 2014). Collated data included demographics, primary tumour treatment, surgical data, histopathology analysis and clinical outcome. Down-staging therapy included Oxaliplatin- or Irinotecan- based regimens, and Cetuximab was also used in patients that were K-RAS wild-type. Response to neo-adjuvant therapy was assessed at the multi-disciplinary team meeting and considered for surgery if all macroscopic CRLM were resectable with a clear margin while preserving sufficient liver parenchyma. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients included, thirty-two (23.5%) patients were considered inoperable and referred for palliative chemotherapy, and thirty-four (25%) patients underwent liver resection. Seventy (51.4%) patients underwent down-staging therapy, of which 37 (52.8%) patients responded sufficiently to undergo liver resection. Patients that failed to respond to down-staging therapy (n = 33, 47.1%) were referred for palliative therapy. There was a significant difference in overall survival between the three groups (surgery vs down-staging therapy vs inoperable disease, P < 0.001). All patients that underwent hepatic resection, including patients that had down-staging therapy, had a significantly better overall survival compared to patients that were inoperable (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, only resection margin significantly influenced disease-free survival (P = 0.017). On multi-variate analysis, R0 resection (P = 0.030) and female (P = 0.036) gender significantly influenced overall survival. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing liver resection with bilobar CRLM have a significantly better survival outcome. R0 resection is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in this patient group. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-12-08 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5143431/ /pubmed/28008341 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i34.1502 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Di Carlo, Sara
Yeung, Derek
Mills, Jamie
Zaitoun, Abed
Cameron, Iain
Gomez, Dhanny
Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title_full Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title_fullStr Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title_full_unstemmed Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title_short Resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
title_sort resection margin influences the outcome of patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastases
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28008341
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v8.i34.1502
work_keys_str_mv AT dicarlosara resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases
AT yeungderek resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases
AT millsjamie resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases
AT zaitounabed resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases
AT cameroniain resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases
AT gomezdhanny resectionmargininfluencestheoutcomeofpatientswithbilobarcolorectallivermetastases