Cargando…

Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Despite an intensive search for predictors of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the QRS duration remains the simplest and most robust predictor of a positive response. QRS duration of ≥ 130 ms is considered to be a prerequisite for CRT; however, some studies have s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gasparini, Maurizio, Galimberti, Paola, Bragato, Renato, Ghio, Stefano, Raineri, Claudia, Landolina, Maurizio, Chieffo, Enrico, Lunati, Maurizio, Mulargia, Ederina, Proclemer, Alessandro, Facchin, Domenico, Rordorf, Roberto, Vicentini, Alessandro, Marcantoni, Lina, Zanon, Francesco, Klersy, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1698-1
_version_ 1782472943752708096
author Gasparini, Maurizio
Galimberti, Paola
Bragato, Renato
Ghio, Stefano
Raineri, Claudia
Landolina, Maurizio
Chieffo, Enrico
Lunati, Maurizio
Mulargia, Ederina
Proclemer, Alessandro
Facchin, Domenico
Rordorf, Roberto
Vicentini, Alessandro
Marcantoni, Lina
Zanon, Francesco
Klersy, Catherine
author_facet Gasparini, Maurizio
Galimberti, Paola
Bragato, Renato
Ghio, Stefano
Raineri, Claudia
Landolina, Maurizio
Chieffo, Enrico
Lunati, Maurizio
Mulargia, Ederina
Proclemer, Alessandro
Facchin, Domenico
Rordorf, Roberto
Vicentini, Alessandro
Marcantoni, Lina
Zanon, Francesco
Klersy, Catherine
author_sort Gasparini, Maurizio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite an intensive search for predictors of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the QRS duration remains the simplest and most robust predictor of a positive response. QRS duration of ≥ 130 ms is considered to be a prerequisite for CRT; however, some studies have shown that CRT may also be effective in heart failure (HF) patients with a narrow QRS (<130 ms). Since CRT can now be performed by pacing the left ventricle from multiple vectors via a single quadripolar lead, it is possible that multipoint pacing (MPP) might be effective in HF patients with a narrow QRS. This article reports the design of the MPP Narrow QRS trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled feasibility study to investigate the efficacy of MPP using two LV pacing vectors in patients with a narrow QRS complex (100–130 ms). METHODS: Fifty patients with a standard ICD indication will be enrolled and randomized (1:1) to either an MPP group or a Standard ICD group. All patients will undergo a low-dose dobutamine stress echo test and only those with contractile reserve will be included in the study and randomized. The primary endpoint will be the percentage of patients in each group that have reverse remodeling at 12 months, defined as a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) of >15% from the baseline. DISCUSSION: This feasibility study will determine whether MPP improves reverse remodeling, as compared with standard ICD, in HF patients who have a narrow QRS complex (100–130 ms). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02402816. Registered on 25 March 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1698-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5143452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51434522016-12-15 Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial Gasparini, Maurizio Galimberti, Paola Bragato, Renato Ghio, Stefano Raineri, Claudia Landolina, Maurizio Chieffo, Enrico Lunati, Maurizio Mulargia, Ederina Proclemer, Alessandro Facchin, Domenico Rordorf, Roberto Vicentini, Alessandro Marcantoni, Lina Zanon, Francesco Klersy, Catherine Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite an intensive search for predictors of the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the QRS duration remains the simplest and most robust predictor of a positive response. QRS duration of ≥ 130 ms is considered to be a prerequisite for CRT; however, some studies have shown that CRT may also be effective in heart failure (HF) patients with a narrow QRS (<130 ms). Since CRT can now be performed by pacing the left ventricle from multiple vectors via a single quadripolar lead, it is possible that multipoint pacing (MPP) might be effective in HF patients with a narrow QRS. This article reports the design of the MPP Narrow QRS trial, a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled feasibility study to investigate the efficacy of MPP using two LV pacing vectors in patients with a narrow QRS complex (100–130 ms). METHODS: Fifty patients with a standard ICD indication will be enrolled and randomized (1:1) to either an MPP group or a Standard ICD group. All patients will undergo a low-dose dobutamine stress echo test and only those with contractile reserve will be included in the study and randomized. The primary endpoint will be the percentage of patients in each group that have reverse remodeling at 12 months, defined as a reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) of >15% from the baseline. DISCUSSION: This feasibility study will determine whether MPP improves reverse remodeling, as compared with standard ICD, in HF patients who have a narrow QRS complex (100–130 ms). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02402816. Registered on 25 March 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1698-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5143452/ /pubmed/27927248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1698-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gasparini, Maurizio
Galimberti, Paola
Bragato, Renato
Ghio, Stefano
Raineri, Claudia
Landolina, Maurizio
Chieffo, Enrico
Lunati, Maurizio
Mulargia, Ederina
Proclemer, Alessandro
Facchin, Domenico
Rordorf, Roberto
Vicentini, Alessandro
Marcantoni, Lina
Zanon, Francesco
Klersy, Catherine
Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_short Multipoint Pacing versus conventional ICD in Patients with a Narrow QRS complex (MPP Narrow QRS trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort multipoint pacing versus conventional icd in patients with a narrow qrs complex (mpp narrow qrs trial): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27927248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1698-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gasparinimaurizio multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT galimbertipaola multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bragatorenato multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ghiostefano multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rainericlaudia multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT landolinamaurizio multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chieffoenrico multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lunatimaurizio multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mulargiaederina multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT proclemeralessandro multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT facchindomenico multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rordorfroberto multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vicentinialessandro multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT marcantonilina multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zanonfrancesco multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klersycatherine multipointpacingversusconventionalicdinpatientswithanarrowqrscomplexmppnarrowqrstrialstudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial