Cargando…

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The proliferation and popularity of wearable activity trackers (eg, Fitbit, Jawbone, Misfit) may present an opportunity to integrate such technology into physical activity interventions. While several systematic reviews have reported intervention effects of using wearable activity tracke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridgers, Nicola D, McNarry, Melitta A, Mackintosh, Kelly A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881359
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6540
_version_ 1782472947271729152
author Ridgers, Nicola D
McNarry, Melitta A
Mackintosh, Kelly A
author_facet Ridgers, Nicola D
McNarry, Melitta A
Mackintosh, Kelly A
author_sort Ridgers, Nicola D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The proliferation and popularity of wearable activity trackers (eg, Fitbit, Jawbone, Misfit) may present an opportunity to integrate such technology into physical activity interventions. While several systematic reviews have reported intervention effects of using wearable activity trackers on adults’ physical activity levels, none to date have focused specifically on children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children’s and adolescents’ physical activity levels. We also examined the feasibility of using such technology in younger populations (age range 5-19 years). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of 5 electronic databases, reference lists, and personal archives to identify articles published up until August 2016 that met the inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they (1) specifically examined the use of a wearable device within an intervention or a feasibility study; (2) included participants aged 5-19 years old; (3) had a measure of physical activity as an outcome variable for intervention studies; (4) reported process data concerning the feasibility of the device in feasibility studies; and (5) were published in English. Data were analyzed in August 2016. RESULTS: In total, we identified and analyzed 5 studies (3 intervention, 2 feasibility). Intervention delivery ranged from 19 days to 3 months, with only 1 study using a randomized controlled trial design. Wearable activity trackers were typically combined with other intervention approaches such as goal setting and researcher feedback. While intervention effects were generally positive, the reported differences were largely nonsignificant. The feasibility studies indicated that monitor comfort and design and feedback features were important factors to children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research concerning the effectiveness and feasibility of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children’s and adolescents’ physical activity levels. While there are some preliminary data to suggest these devices may have the potential to increase activity levels through self-monitoring and goal setting in the short term, more research is needed to establish longer-term effects on behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5143467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51434672016-12-20 Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review Ridgers, Nicola D McNarry, Melitta A Mackintosh, Kelly A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Review BACKGROUND: The proliferation and popularity of wearable activity trackers (eg, Fitbit, Jawbone, Misfit) may present an opportunity to integrate such technology into physical activity interventions. While several systematic reviews have reported intervention effects of using wearable activity trackers on adults’ physical activity levels, none to date have focused specifically on children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine the effectiveness of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children’s and adolescents’ physical activity levels. We also examined the feasibility of using such technology in younger populations (age range 5-19 years). METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of 5 electronic databases, reference lists, and personal archives to identify articles published up until August 2016 that met the inclusion criteria. Articles were included if they (1) specifically examined the use of a wearable device within an intervention or a feasibility study; (2) included participants aged 5-19 years old; (3) had a measure of physical activity as an outcome variable for intervention studies; (4) reported process data concerning the feasibility of the device in feasibility studies; and (5) were published in English. Data were analyzed in August 2016. RESULTS: In total, we identified and analyzed 5 studies (3 intervention, 2 feasibility). Intervention delivery ranged from 19 days to 3 months, with only 1 study using a randomized controlled trial design. Wearable activity trackers were typically combined with other intervention approaches such as goal setting and researcher feedback. While intervention effects were generally positive, the reported differences were largely nonsignificant. The feasibility studies indicated that monitor comfort and design and feedback features were important factors to children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of research concerning the effectiveness and feasibility of wearable activity trackers as a tool for increasing children’s and adolescents’ physical activity levels. While there are some preliminary data to suggest these devices may have the potential to increase activity levels through self-monitoring and goal setting in the short term, more research is needed to establish longer-term effects on behavior. JMIR Publications 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5143467/ /pubmed/27881359 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6540 Text en ©Nicola D Ridgers, Melitta A McNarry, Kelly A Mackintosh. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 23.11.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Ridgers, Nicola D
McNarry, Melitta A
Mackintosh, Kelly A
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title_full Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title_short Feasibility and Effectiveness of Using Wearable Activity Trackers in Youth: A Systematic Review
title_sort feasibility and effectiveness of using wearable activity trackers in youth: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881359
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.6540
work_keys_str_mv AT ridgersnicolad feasibilityandeffectivenessofusingwearableactivitytrackersinyouthasystematicreview
AT mcnarrymelittaa feasibilityandeffectivenessofusingwearableactivitytrackersinyouthasystematicreview
AT mackintoshkellya feasibilityandeffectivenessofusingwearableactivitytrackersinyouthasystematicreview