The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study

To develop an expert consensus opinion of the criteria for selection of peer educator for HIV/AIDS care program, twenty experts were invited to complete a two-round Delphi consultation. Response rates of the panelists for the first and second rounds were both 100%, and the authority coefficient of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qiu, Yan, Shen, Jiayin, Lu, Hongzhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9521313
_version_ 1782472981660827648
author Qiu, Yan
Shen, Jiayin
Lu, Hongzhou
author_facet Qiu, Yan
Shen, Jiayin
Lu, Hongzhou
author_sort Qiu, Yan
collection PubMed
description To develop an expert consensus opinion of the criteria for selection of peer educator for HIV/AIDS care program, twenty experts were invited to complete a two-round Delphi consultation. Response rates of the panelists for the first and second rounds were both 100%, and the authority coefficient of the experts was 0.75. Experts achieved consensus on a total of nine items (75%) on completion of the study. The Precedence Chart Method was used to calculate the weight of each indicator, and then a priority list was generated accordingly. This study provides the initial selection criteria for HIV/AIDS peer educators in Shanghai as well as in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5143706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51437062016-12-21 The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study Qiu, Yan Shen, Jiayin Lu, Hongzhou Scientifica (Cairo) Research Article To develop an expert consensus opinion of the criteria for selection of peer educator for HIV/AIDS care program, twenty experts were invited to complete a two-round Delphi consultation. Response rates of the panelists for the first and second rounds were both 100%, and the authority coefficient of the experts was 0.75. Experts achieved consensus on a total of nine items (75%) on completion of the study. The Precedence Chart Method was used to calculate the weight of each indicator, and then a priority list was generated accordingly. This study provides the initial selection criteria for HIV/AIDS peer educators in Shanghai as well as in China. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5143706/ /pubmed/28003930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9521313 Text en Copyright © 2016 Yan Qiu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qiu, Yan
Shen, Jiayin
Lu, Hongzhou
The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title_full The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title_fullStr The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title_short The Development of Criteria for the Selection of Chinese Peer Educators in HIV Management: A Delphi Study
title_sort development of criteria for the selection of chinese peer educators in hiv management: a delphi study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5143706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28003930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9521313
work_keys_str_mv AT qiuyan thedevelopmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy
AT shenjiayin thedevelopmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy
AT luhongzhou thedevelopmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy
AT qiuyan developmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy
AT shenjiayin developmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy
AT luhongzhou developmentofcriteriafortheselectionofchinesepeereducatorsinhivmanagementadelphistudy

Ejemplares similares