Cargando…

Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()

OBJECTIVE: To determine the lesion characterization capability by low dose CT for localized lung lesions in comparison with standard dose CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Approval for this study was granted by our Institutional Review Board. Fifty-two consecutive patients (36 males and 16 females, median a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubo, Takeshi, Ohno, Yoshiharu, Takenaka, Daisuke, Nishino, Mizuki, Gautam, Shiva, Sugimura, Kazuro, Kauczor, Hans Ulrich, Hatabu, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27957516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.03.002
_version_ 1782473064052686848
author Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Takenaka, Daisuke
Nishino, Mizuki
Gautam, Shiva
Sugimura, Kazuro
Kauczor, Hans Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_facet Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Takenaka, Daisuke
Nishino, Mizuki
Gautam, Shiva
Sugimura, Kazuro
Kauczor, Hans Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_sort Kubo, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the lesion characterization capability by low dose CT for localized lung lesions in comparison with standard dose CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Approval for this study was granted by our Institutional Review Board. Fifty-two consecutive patients (36 males and 16 females, median age of 71 years.) who had CT examinations for evaluation of lung lesions comprise the study population. Two chest CT scans were performed with current time product of 50 and 150 mAs at 120 kVp, with the same scan length with a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Three readers evaluated 52 target lesions and assigned an overall impression score to each target lesion, using a 5 point scale from 1 (definitely benign) to 5 (definitely malignant). Six features of the lesions including lesion type, margin characteristics, calcification, lobulation, speculation, and pleural indentation were also reported with 5-point scales. The weighted kappa analyses and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used for analysis. RESULTS: The mean kappa value between low-and standard-dose CT was 0.82 for overall impression of the lesions, showing almost perfect agreement. Area under the curve of low-dose CT (Az = 0.74) had no significant difference from that of standard-dose CT (Az = 0.74) (p = 0.61). The kappa values for six lesion features ranged from 0.45 to 0.83, showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: Lesion characterization capability by low-dose CT images was comparable to that by standard-dose CT images and therefore sufficient for evaluation of localized lung lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5144111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51441112016-12-12 Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study() Kubo, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu Takenaka, Daisuke Nishino, Mizuki Gautam, Shiva Sugimura, Kazuro Kauczor, Hans Ulrich Hatabu, Hiroto Eur J Radiol Open Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the lesion characterization capability by low dose CT for localized lung lesions in comparison with standard dose CT. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Approval for this study was granted by our Institutional Review Board. Fifty-two consecutive patients (36 males and 16 females, median age of 71 years.) who had CT examinations for evaluation of lung lesions comprise the study population. Two chest CT scans were performed with current time product of 50 and 150 mAs at 120 kVp, with the same scan length with a 16 detector-row CT scanner. Three readers evaluated 52 target lesions and assigned an overall impression score to each target lesion, using a 5 point scale from 1 (definitely benign) to 5 (definitely malignant). Six features of the lesions including lesion type, margin characteristics, calcification, lobulation, speculation, and pleural indentation were also reported with 5-point scales. The weighted kappa analyses and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used for analysis. RESULTS: The mean kappa value between low-and standard-dose CT was 0.82 for overall impression of the lesions, showing almost perfect agreement. Area under the curve of low-dose CT (Az = 0.74) had no significant difference from that of standard-dose CT (Az = 0.74) (p = 0.61). The kappa values for six lesion features ranged from 0.45 to 0.83, showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSION: Lesion characterization capability by low-dose CT images was comparable to that by standard-dose CT images and therefore sufficient for evaluation of localized lung lesions. Elsevier 2016-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5144111/ /pubmed/27957516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.03.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Takenaka, Daisuke
Nishino, Mizuki
Gautam, Shiva
Sugimura, Kazuro
Kauczor, Hans Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title_full Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title_fullStr Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title_full_unstemmed Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title_short Standard-dose vs. low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: Capability for lesion characterization—iLEAD study()
title_sort standard-dose vs. low-dose ct protocols in the evaluation of localized lung lesions: capability for lesion characterization—ilead study()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27957516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.03.002
work_keys_str_mv AT kubotakeshi standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT ohnoyoshiharu standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT takenakadaisuke standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT nishinomizuki standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT gautamshiva standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT sugimurakazuro standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT kauczorhansulrich standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT hatabuhiroto standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy
AT standarddosevslowdosectprotocolsintheevaluationoflocalizedlunglesionscapabilityforlesioncharacterizationileadstudy