Cargando…

Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic capability of low-dose CT (50 mAs) in comparison to standard-dose CT (150 mAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent two non-contrast chest CT scans with different current-time products (50 and 150 mAs at 120 kVp) on a 64-detector row...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubo, Takeshi, Ohno, Yoshiharu, Nishino, Mizuki, Lin, Pei-Jan, Gautam, Shiva, Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich, Hatabu, Hiroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27957519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.04.001
_version_ 1782473064643035136
author Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Nishino, Mizuki
Lin, Pei-Jan
Gautam, Shiva
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_facet Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Nishino, Mizuki
Lin, Pei-Jan
Gautam, Shiva
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
author_sort Kubo, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic capability of low-dose CT (50 mAs) in comparison to standard-dose CT (150 mAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent two non-contrast chest CT scans with different current-time products (50 and 150 mAs at 120 kVp) on a 64-detector row CT scanner. Three board certified chest radiologists independently reviewed 118 series of 2 mm-thick images (2 series for each of 59 patients) in a random order. The readers assessed abnormal findings including emphysema, ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, micronodules, bronchiectasis, honeycomb, nodules (>5 mm), aortic aneurysm, coronary artery calcification, pericardial and pleural effusion, pleural thickening, mediastinal tumor and lymph node enlargement. Five-point scale from 1 (definitely absent) to 5 (definitely present) was used to record the results. The rates of score agreement between two images were calculated. Deviation of one observer's score from other two observers was compared between low dose CT and standard dose CT. RESULTS: Mean agreement rate of the lung parenchymal findings between low dose CT and standard dose CT images was 0.836 (range, 0.746–0.926). Mean agreement rates for mediastinal and pleural findings were 0.920 (range, 0.735–1.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the deviation of the observers' scores between low-dose CT and standard-dose CT. CONCLUSION: Low dose CT protocol at 50 mAs can produce the screening results consistent with standard dose CT protocol (150 mAs), supporting routine use of low dose chest CT protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5144113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51441132016-12-12 Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality Kubo, Takeshi Ohno, Yoshiharu Nishino, Mizuki Lin, Pei-Jan Gautam, Shiva Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich Hatabu, Hiroto Eur J Radiol Open Article PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic capability of low-dose CT (50 mAs) in comparison to standard-dose CT (150 mAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients underwent two non-contrast chest CT scans with different current-time products (50 and 150 mAs at 120 kVp) on a 64-detector row CT scanner. Three board certified chest radiologists independently reviewed 118 series of 2 mm-thick images (2 series for each of 59 patients) in a random order. The readers assessed abnormal findings including emphysema, ground-glass opacity, reticular opacity, micronodules, bronchiectasis, honeycomb, nodules (>5 mm), aortic aneurysm, coronary artery calcification, pericardial and pleural effusion, pleural thickening, mediastinal tumor and lymph node enlargement. Five-point scale from 1 (definitely absent) to 5 (definitely present) was used to record the results. The rates of score agreement between two images were calculated. Deviation of one observer's score from other two observers was compared between low dose CT and standard dose CT. RESULTS: Mean agreement rate of the lung parenchymal findings between low dose CT and standard dose CT images was 0.836 (range, 0.746–0.926). Mean agreement rates for mediastinal and pleural findings were 0.920 (range, 0.735–1.000). There was no statistically significant difference in the deviation of the observers' scores between low-dose CT and standard-dose CT. CONCLUSION: Low dose CT protocol at 50 mAs can produce the screening results consistent with standard dose CT protocol (150 mAs), supporting routine use of low dose chest CT protocol. Elsevier 2016-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5144113/ /pubmed/27957519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.04.001 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kubo, Takeshi
Ohno, Yoshiharu
Nishino, Mizuki
Lin, Pei-Jan
Gautam, Shiva
Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
Hatabu, Hiroto
Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title_full Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title_fullStr Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title_full_unstemmed Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title_short Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
title_sort low dose chest ct protocol (50 mas) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27957519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2016.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kubotakeshi lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT ohnoyoshiharu lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT nishinomizuki lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT linpeijan lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT gautamshiva lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT kauczorhansulrich lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT hatabuhiroto lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality
AT lowdosechestctprotocol50masasaroutineprotocolforcomprehensiveassessmentofintrathoracicabnormality