Cargando…

Care of newborn in the community and at home

India has contributed immensely toward generating evidence on two key domains of newborn care: Home Based Newborn Care (HBNC) and community mobilization. In a model developed in Gadchiroli (Maharashtra) in the 1990s, a package of Interventions delivered by community health workers during home visits...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neogi, S B, Sharma, J, Chauhan, M, Khanna, R, Chokshi, M, Srivastava, R, Prabhakar, P K, Khera, A, Kumar, R, Zodpey, S, Paul, V K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27924109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.185
_version_ 1782473065891889152
author Neogi, S B
Sharma, J
Chauhan, M
Khanna, R
Chokshi, M
Srivastava, R
Prabhakar, P K
Khera, A
Kumar, R
Zodpey, S
Paul, V K
author_facet Neogi, S B
Sharma, J
Chauhan, M
Khanna, R
Chokshi, M
Srivastava, R
Prabhakar, P K
Khera, A
Kumar, R
Zodpey, S
Paul, V K
author_sort Neogi, S B
collection PubMed
description India has contributed immensely toward generating evidence on two key domains of newborn care: Home Based Newborn Care (HBNC) and community mobilization. In a model developed in Gadchiroli (Maharashtra) in the 1990s, a package of Interventions delivered by community health workers during home visits led to a marked decline in neonatal deaths. On the basis of this experience, the national HBNC program centered around Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) was introduced in 2011, and is now the main community-level program in newborn health. Earlier in 2004, the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) program was rolled out with inclusion of home visits by Anganwadi Worker as an integral component. IMNCI has been implemented in 505 districts in 27 states and 4 union territories. A mix of Anganwadi Workers, ASHAs, auxiliary nursing midwives (ANMs) was trained. The rapid roll out of IMNCI program resulted in improving quality of newborn care at the ground field. However, since 2012 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare decided to limit the IMNCI program to ANMs only and leaving the Anganwadi component to the stewardship of the Integrated Child Development Services. ASHAs, the frontline workers for HBNC, receive four rounds of training using two modules. There are a total of over 900 000 ASHAs per link workers in the country, out of which, only 14% have completed the fourth round of training. The pace of uptake of the HBNC program has been slow. Of the annual rural birth cohort of over 17 million, about 4 million newborns have been visited by ASHA during the financial year 2013–2014 and out of this 120 000 neonates have been identified as sick and referred to health facilities for higher level of neonatal care. Supportive supervision remains a challenge, the role of ANMs in supervision needs more clarity and there are issues surrounding quality of training and the supply of HBNC kits. The program has low visibility in many states. Now is the time to tap the missed opportunity of miniscule coverage of HBNC; that at least half of the country's birth cohort should be covered by this program by 2016, coupled with rapid scale up of the community-based treatment of neonates with pneumonia or sepsis, where referral is not possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5144118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51441182016-12-23 Care of newborn in the community and at home Neogi, S B Sharma, J Chauhan, M Khanna, R Chokshi, M Srivastava, R Prabhakar, P K Khera, A Kumar, R Zodpey, S Paul, V K J Perinatol Review India has contributed immensely toward generating evidence on two key domains of newborn care: Home Based Newborn Care (HBNC) and community mobilization. In a model developed in Gadchiroli (Maharashtra) in the 1990s, a package of Interventions delivered by community health workers during home visits led to a marked decline in neonatal deaths. On the basis of this experience, the national HBNC program centered around Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) was introduced in 2011, and is now the main community-level program in newborn health. Earlier in 2004, the Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) program was rolled out with inclusion of home visits by Anganwadi Worker as an integral component. IMNCI has been implemented in 505 districts in 27 states and 4 union territories. A mix of Anganwadi Workers, ASHAs, auxiliary nursing midwives (ANMs) was trained. The rapid roll out of IMNCI program resulted in improving quality of newborn care at the ground field. However, since 2012 the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare decided to limit the IMNCI program to ANMs only and leaving the Anganwadi component to the stewardship of the Integrated Child Development Services. ASHAs, the frontline workers for HBNC, receive four rounds of training using two modules. There are a total of over 900 000 ASHAs per link workers in the country, out of which, only 14% have completed the fourth round of training. The pace of uptake of the HBNC program has been slow. Of the annual rural birth cohort of over 17 million, about 4 million newborns have been visited by ASHA during the financial year 2013–2014 and out of this 120 000 neonates have been identified as sick and referred to health facilities for higher level of neonatal care. Supportive supervision remains a challenge, the role of ANMs in supervision needs more clarity and there are issues surrounding quality of training and the supply of HBNC kits. The program has low visibility in many states. Now is the time to tap the missed opportunity of miniscule coverage of HBNC; that at least half of the country's birth cohort should be covered by this program by 2016, coupled with rapid scale up of the community-based treatment of neonates with pneumonia or sepsis, where referral is not possible. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5144118/ /pubmed/27924109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.185 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Neogi, S B
Sharma, J
Chauhan, M
Khanna, R
Chokshi, M
Srivastava, R
Prabhakar, P K
Khera, A
Kumar, R
Zodpey, S
Paul, V K
Care of newborn in the community and at home
title Care of newborn in the community and at home
title_full Care of newborn in the community and at home
title_fullStr Care of newborn in the community and at home
title_full_unstemmed Care of newborn in the community and at home
title_short Care of newborn in the community and at home
title_sort care of newborn in the community and at home
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27924109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.185
work_keys_str_mv AT neogisb careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT sharmaj careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT chauhanm careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT khannar careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT chokshim careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT srivastavar careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT prabhakarpk careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT kheraa careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT kumarr careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT zodpeys careofnewborninthecommunityandathome
AT paulvk careofnewborninthecommunityandathome