Cargando…

Validity of bedside blood glucose measurement in critically ill patients with intensive insulin therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There have been variable results on the practice of tight glycemic control, and studies have demonstrated that point-of-care (POC) glucometers have variable accuracy. Glucometers must be accurate, and many variables can affect blood glucose levels. The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoodpoor, Ata, Hamishehkar, Hadi, Shadvar, Kamran, Sanaie, Sarvin, Iranpour, Afshin, Fattahi, Vahid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994380
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.194009
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There have been variable results on the practice of tight glycemic control, and studies have demonstrated that point-of-care (POC) glucometers have variable accuracy. Glucometers must be accurate, and many variables can affect blood glucose levels. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between blood glucose concentrations obtained from POC glucometers and laboratory results in critically ill patients with intensive insulin therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study which enrolled 300 critically ill patients. Four samples of arterial blood were collected and analyzed at the bedside with the POC glucometer and also in the central laboratory to obtain the blood glucose level. To define the effect of various factors on this relation, we noted the levels of hemoglobin (Hb), PaO(2), body temperature, bilirubin, history of drug usage, and sepsis. RESULTS: There were not any significant differences between blood sugar levels using laboratory and glucometer methods of measurements. There was a good and significant correlation between glucose levels between two methods (r = 0.81, P < 0.001). Among evaluated factors (body temperature, bilirubin level, blood pressure, Hb level, PaO(2), sepsis, and drugs) which added one by one in model, just drugs decreased the correlation more than others (r = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The results of POC glucometer differ from laboratory glucose concentrations, especially in critically ill patients with unstable hemodynamic status while receiving several drugs. This may raise the concern about using POC devices for tight glycemic control in critically ill patients. These results should be interpreted with caution because of the large variation of accuracy among different glucometer devices.