Cargando…

Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is fast becoming a useful tool to aid clinicians in pre-surgical planning through the ability to provide information that could otherwise be extremely difficult if not impossible to obtain. However, in order to provide clinically relevant metrics, the accuracy of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bates, A.J., Comerford, A., Cetto, R., Doorly, D.J., Schroter, R.C., Tolley, N.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.091
_version_ 1782473175188111360
author Bates, A.J.
Comerford, A.
Cetto, R.
Doorly, D.J.
Schroter, R.C.
Tolley, N.S.
author_facet Bates, A.J.
Comerford, A.
Cetto, R.
Doorly, D.J.
Schroter, R.C.
Tolley, N.S.
author_sort Bates, A.J.
collection PubMed
description Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is fast becoming a useful tool to aid clinicians in pre-surgical planning through the ability to provide information that could otherwise be extremely difficult if not impossible to obtain. However, in order to provide clinically relevant metrics, the accuracy of the computational method must be sufficiently high. There are many alternative methods employed in the process of performing CFD simulations within the airways, including different segmentation and meshing strategies, as well as alternative approaches to solving the Navier–Stokes equations. However, as in vivo validation of the simulated flow patterns within the airways is not possible, little exists in the way of validation of the various simulation techniques. The data presented here consists of very highly resolved flow data. The degree of resolution is compared to the highest necessary resolutions of the Kolmogorov length and time scales. Therefore this data is ideally suited to act as a benchmark case to which cheaper computational methods may be compared. A dataset and solution setup for one such more efficient method, large eddy simulation (LES), is also presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5144758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51447582016-12-15 Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas Bates, A.J. Comerford, A. Cetto, R. Doorly, D.J. Schroter, R.C. Tolley, N.S. Data Brief Data Article Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is fast becoming a useful tool to aid clinicians in pre-surgical planning through the ability to provide information that could otherwise be extremely difficult if not impossible to obtain. However, in order to provide clinically relevant metrics, the accuracy of the computational method must be sufficiently high. There are many alternative methods employed in the process of performing CFD simulations within the airways, including different segmentation and meshing strategies, as well as alternative approaches to solving the Navier–Stokes equations. However, as in vivo validation of the simulated flow patterns within the airways is not possible, little exists in the way of validation of the various simulation techniques. The data presented here consists of very highly resolved flow data. The degree of resolution is compared to the highest necessary resolutions of the Kolmogorov length and time scales. Therefore this data is ideally suited to act as a benchmark case to which cheaper computational methods may be compared. A dataset and solution setup for one such more efficient method, large eddy simulation (LES), is also presented. Elsevier 2016-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5144758/ /pubmed/27981200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.091 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Data Article
Bates, A.J.
Comerford, A.
Cetto, R.
Doorly, D.J.
Schroter, R.C.
Tolley, N.S.
Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title_full Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title_fullStr Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title_full_unstemmed Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title_short Computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
title_sort computational fluid dynamics benchmark dataset of airflow in tracheas
topic Data Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5144758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27981200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.091
work_keys_str_mv AT batesaj computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas
AT comerforda computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas
AT cettor computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas
AT doorlydj computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas
AT schroterrc computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas
AT tolleyns computationalfluiddynamicsbenchmarkdatasetofairflowintracheas