Cargando…

Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?

BACKGROUND: Reimer’s migration percentage (MP) is the most established radiographic risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy (CP), and it assists surgical decision-making. The head–shaft angle (HSA) measures the valgus of the head and neck in relation to the shaft and may also be a useful pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chougule, Sanjay, Dabis, John, Petrie, Aviva, Daly, Karen, Gelfer, Yael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0774-0
_version_ 1782473360269115392
author Chougule, Sanjay
Dabis, John
Petrie, Aviva
Daly, Karen
Gelfer, Yael
author_facet Chougule, Sanjay
Dabis, John
Petrie, Aviva
Daly, Karen
Gelfer, Yael
author_sort Chougule, Sanjay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reimer’s migration percentage (MP) is the most established radiographic risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy (CP), and it assists surgical decision-making. The head–shaft angle (HSA) measures the valgus of the head and neck in relation to the shaft and may also be a useful predictor of hip migration at a young age. This study first defined normal values and investigated whether the head–shaft angle (HSA) is a continuous risk factor for hip migration in CP. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty AP pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive children comprising the hip surveillance programme in our region were analysed for MP and HSA. Inclusion criteria were children with spastic CP and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels of III–V, along with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The mean age was 8.8 (range 3–18) years and the mean follow-up time was 7.5 (range 5–10) years. Radiographs of 103 typically developing children (TDC) were selected for the control group. The reliability of the measurements was determined. A random effects analysis was used to assess the relationship between MP and HSA for all data and for MP > 40 %. RESULTS: The TDC cohort had a mean HSA of 157.7° whilst that for the CP cohort was 161.7°. The value declined with age in both groups but remained consistently higher in the CP group. A random effects analysis considering the longitudinal data showed that there was no significant effect of HSA on MP. Similarly, when excluding CP patients with MP < 40 %, there was no significant effect of HSA on MP. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no correlation between HSA and hip migration in children with CP in this age group. Using the HSA as a routine radiographic measure in the management pathway across childhood does not offer any added value. Early enrolment onto the hip surveillance programme could offer a better prediction of hip migration using the HSA at a very young age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II retrospective prognostic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5145824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51458242016-12-23 Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy? Chougule, Sanjay Dabis, John Petrie, Aviva Daly, Karen Gelfer, Yael J Child Orthop Original Clinical Article BACKGROUND: Reimer’s migration percentage (MP) is the most established radiographic risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy (CP), and it assists surgical decision-making. The head–shaft angle (HSA) measures the valgus of the head and neck in relation to the shaft and may also be a useful predictor of hip migration at a young age. This study first defined normal values and investigated whether the head–shaft angle (HSA) is a continuous risk factor for hip migration in CP. METHODS: Three hundred and fifty AP pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive children comprising the hip surveillance programme in our region were analysed for MP and HSA. Inclusion criteria were children with spastic CP and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels of III–V, along with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. The mean age was 8.8 (range 3–18) years and the mean follow-up time was 7.5 (range 5–10) years. Radiographs of 103 typically developing children (TDC) were selected for the control group. The reliability of the measurements was determined. A random effects analysis was used to assess the relationship between MP and HSA for all data and for MP > 40 %. RESULTS: The TDC cohort had a mean HSA of 157.7° whilst that for the CP cohort was 161.7°. The value declined with age in both groups but remained consistently higher in the CP group. A random effects analysis considering the longitudinal data showed that there was no significant effect of HSA on MP. Similarly, when excluding CP patients with MP < 40 %, there was no significant effect of HSA on MP. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no correlation between HSA and hip migration in children with CP in this age group. Using the HSA as a routine radiographic measure in the management pathway across childhood does not offer any added value. Early enrolment onto the hip surveillance programme could offer a better prediction of hip migration using the HSA at a very young age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II retrospective prognostic study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-10-12 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5145824/ /pubmed/27734265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0774-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Clinical Article
Chougule, Sanjay
Dabis, John
Petrie, Aviva
Daly, Karen
Gelfer, Yael
Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title_full Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title_fullStr Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title_full_unstemmed Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title_short Is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
title_sort is head–shaft angle a valuable continuous risk factor for hip migration in cerebral palsy?
topic Original Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145824/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0774-0
work_keys_str_mv AT chougulesanjay isheadshaftangleavaluablecontinuousriskfactorforhipmigrationincerebralpalsy
AT dabisjohn isheadshaftangleavaluablecontinuousriskfactorforhipmigrationincerebralpalsy
AT petrieaviva isheadshaftangleavaluablecontinuousriskfactorforhipmigrationincerebralpalsy
AT dalykaren isheadshaftangleavaluablecontinuousriskfactorforhipmigrationincerebralpalsy
AT gelferyael isheadshaftangleavaluablecontinuousriskfactorforhipmigrationincerebralpalsy