Cargando…

Humeral lengthening and deformity correction

INTRODUCTION: Ilizarov principles and hybrid fixation have improved the results of humeral lengthening. We reviewed the literature on humeral lengthening using different fixators with regard to indications, operative technique, results and complications. We also retrospectively reviewed 56 segments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hosny, Gamal Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0789-6
_version_ 1782473363814350848
author Hosny, Gamal Ahmed
author_facet Hosny, Gamal Ahmed
author_sort Hosny, Gamal Ahmed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ilizarov principles and hybrid fixation have improved the results of humeral lengthening. We reviewed the literature on humeral lengthening using different fixators with regard to indications, operative technique, results and complications. We also retrospectively reviewed 56 segments in 46 patients treated with humeral lengthening and deformity correction using Ilizarov external fixation. The etiology was achondroplasia (10 patients), epiphyseal injury (8 cases), infection (11 cases) and Erb’s palsy (17 cases). The average age at surgery was 14 years (range 8–20 years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically and DASH score was available for 36 segments. Follow-up ranged from 1−11 years. The magnitude of lengthening achieved ranged from 5−15.5 cm with an average of 9 cm. The average healing index was 29.5 cm (range 26–37 days). The percentage of area of lengthening to the original length ranged from 25 to 100% with an average of 55%. The average DASH (available for 36 segments only) score ranged from 15−40 preoperatively to 7−16 (P = 0.04) at last follow-up. Functionally, all the patients returned to their preoperative jobs and daily activities including sports. COMPLICATIONS: Complications included pin track infection in 46 segments, radial nerve palsy which recovered completely in 2 patients, fracture of the regenerate in 7 cases and premature consolidation of the regenerate in one case. CONCLUSION: Humeral lengthening, whether unilateral or bilateral, is a valid method that improves the outcome following arm shortening and deformity correction, including angulation and rotation. Extensive lengthening up to 100% of the original length could be achieved without increasing the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5145839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51458392016-12-23 Humeral lengthening and deformity correction Hosny, Gamal Ahmed J Child Orthop Current Concept Review INTRODUCTION: Ilizarov principles and hybrid fixation have improved the results of humeral lengthening. We reviewed the literature on humeral lengthening using different fixators with regard to indications, operative technique, results and complications. We also retrospectively reviewed 56 segments in 46 patients treated with humeral lengthening and deformity correction using Ilizarov external fixation. The etiology was achondroplasia (10 patients), epiphyseal injury (8 cases), infection (11 cases) and Erb’s palsy (17 cases). The average age at surgery was 14 years (range 8–20 years). The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically and DASH score was available for 36 segments. Follow-up ranged from 1−11 years. The magnitude of lengthening achieved ranged from 5−15.5 cm with an average of 9 cm. The average healing index was 29.5 cm (range 26–37 days). The percentage of area of lengthening to the original length ranged from 25 to 100% with an average of 55%. The average DASH (available for 36 segments only) score ranged from 15−40 preoperatively to 7−16 (P = 0.04) at last follow-up. Functionally, all the patients returned to their preoperative jobs and daily activities including sports. COMPLICATIONS: Complications included pin track infection in 46 segments, radial nerve palsy which recovered completely in 2 patients, fracture of the regenerate in 7 cases and premature consolidation of the regenerate in one case. CONCLUSION: Humeral lengthening, whether unilateral or bilateral, is a valid method that improves the outcome following arm shortening and deformity correction, including angulation and rotation. Extensive lengthening up to 100% of the original length could be achieved without increasing the risk of complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-08 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5145839/ /pubmed/27826910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0789-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Current Concept Review
Hosny, Gamal Ahmed
Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title_full Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title_fullStr Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title_full_unstemmed Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title_short Humeral lengthening and deformity correction
title_sort humeral lengthening and deformity correction
topic Current Concept Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5145839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0789-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hosnygamalahmed humerallengtheninganddeformitycorrection