Cargando…

Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement

PURPOSE: Evaluate the bond strength of different translucent fiber posts in the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the fiber post used: Reforpost (opaq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bazzo, João Fernando, Pedriali, Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira, Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil, Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt, Moura, Sandra Kiss, de de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5146778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994324
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.194036
_version_ 1782473548236849152
author Bazzo, João Fernando
Pedriali, Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira
Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil
Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt
Moura, Sandra Kiss
de de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella
author_facet Bazzo, João Fernando
Pedriali, Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira
Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil
Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt
Moura, Sandra Kiss
de de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella
author_sort Bazzo, João Fernando
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Evaluate the bond strength of different translucent fiber posts in the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the fiber post used: Reforpost (opaque [control]), exacto, white post, radix, and Macro-Lock Illusion X-RO. The roots were subjected to chemomechanical preparation and cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. The teeth were sectioned into slices of the different root thirds and tested for bond strength (push-out). Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test were used to verify statistical differences between groups (P < 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference between the root thirds was detected (P > 0.05). However, the performance of the posts demonstrated a significant difference (P < 0.05). RDX had a lower performance in the apical third (P < 0.05). The other fiber posts had the same performance irrespective of the root third evaluated. The predominant failure pattern was adhesive between resin cement and root dentin. CONCLUSION: In general, the different translucent fiber posts showed the same performance. Yet, translucent fiber posts did not show superior bond strength compared with the opaque fiber post in any of the root thirds evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5146778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51467782016-12-19 Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement Bazzo, João Fernando Pedriali, Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt Moura, Sandra Kiss de de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella J Conserv Dent Original Research Article PURPOSE: Evaluate the bond strength of different translucent fiber posts in the cervical, middle, and apical root thirds cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into five groups according to the fiber post used: Reforpost (opaque [control]), exacto, white post, radix, and Macro-Lock Illusion X-RO. The roots were subjected to chemomechanical preparation and cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. The teeth were sectioned into slices of the different root thirds and tested for bond strength (push-out). Two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni test were used to verify statistical differences between groups (P < 0.05). RESULTS: No significant difference between the root thirds was detected (P > 0.05). However, the performance of the posts demonstrated a significant difference (P < 0.05). RDX had a lower performance in the apical third (P < 0.05). The other fiber posts had the same performance irrespective of the root third evaluated. The predominant failure pattern was adhesive between resin cement and root dentin. CONCLUSION: In general, the different translucent fiber posts showed the same performance. Yet, translucent fiber posts did not show superior bond strength compared with the opaque fiber post in any of the root thirds evaluated. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5146778/ /pubmed/27994324 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.194036 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bazzo, João Fernando
Pedriali, Maria Beatriz Bergonse Pereira
Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil
Berger, Sandrine Bittencourt
Moura, Sandra Kiss
de de Carvalho, Rodrigo Varella
Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title_full Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title_fullStr Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title_full_unstemmed Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title_short Push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
title_sort push-out bond strength of different translucent fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5146778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27994324
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.194036
work_keys_str_mv AT bazzojoaofernando pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement
AT pedrialimariabeatrizbergonsepereira pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement
AT guiraldoricardodanil pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement
AT bergersandrinebittencourt pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement
AT mourasandrakiss pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement
AT dedecarvalhorodrigovarella pushoutbondstrengthofdifferenttranslucentfiberpostscementedwithselfadhesiveresincement