Cargando…
Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma
Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is a relatively new method being investigated for antimicrobial activity. However, the exact mode of action is still being explored. Here we report that CAP efficacy is directly correlated to bacterial cell wall thickness in several species. Biofilms of Gram po...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5146927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38610 |
_version_ | 1782473582483341312 |
---|---|
author | Mai-Prochnow, Anne Clauson, Maryse Hong, Jungmi Murphy, Anthony B. |
author_facet | Mai-Prochnow, Anne Clauson, Maryse Hong, Jungmi Murphy, Anthony B. |
author_sort | Mai-Prochnow, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is a relatively new method being investigated for antimicrobial activity. However, the exact mode of action is still being explored. Here we report that CAP efficacy is directly correlated to bacterial cell wall thickness in several species. Biofilms of Gram positive Bacillus subtilis, possessing a 55.4 nm cell wall, showed the highest resistance to CAP, with less than one log(10) reduction after 10 min treatment. In contrast, biofilms of Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa, possessing only a 2.4 nm cell wall, were almost completely eradicated using the same treatment conditions. Planktonic cultures of Gram negative Pseudomonas libanensis also had a higher log(10) reduction than Gram positive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mixed species biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis showed a similar trend of Gram positive bacteria being more resistant to CAP treatment. However, when grown in co-culture, Gram negative P. aeruginosa was more resistant to CAP overall than as a mono-species biofilm. Emission spectra indicated OH and O, capable of structural cell wall bond breakage, were present in the plasma. This study indicates that cell wall thickness correlates with CAP inactivation times of bacteria, but cell membranes and biofilm matrix are also likely to play a role. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5146927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51469272016-12-16 Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma Mai-Prochnow, Anne Clauson, Maryse Hong, Jungmi Murphy, Anthony B. Sci Rep Article Cold atmospheric-pressure plasma (CAP) is a relatively new method being investigated for antimicrobial activity. However, the exact mode of action is still being explored. Here we report that CAP efficacy is directly correlated to bacterial cell wall thickness in several species. Biofilms of Gram positive Bacillus subtilis, possessing a 55.4 nm cell wall, showed the highest resistance to CAP, with less than one log(10) reduction after 10 min treatment. In contrast, biofilms of Gram negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa, possessing only a 2.4 nm cell wall, were almost completely eradicated using the same treatment conditions. Planktonic cultures of Gram negative Pseudomonas libanensis also had a higher log(10) reduction than Gram positive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mixed species biofilms of P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis showed a similar trend of Gram positive bacteria being more resistant to CAP treatment. However, when grown in co-culture, Gram negative P. aeruginosa was more resistant to CAP overall than as a mono-species biofilm. Emission spectra indicated OH and O, capable of structural cell wall bond breakage, were present in the plasma. This study indicates that cell wall thickness correlates with CAP inactivation times of bacteria, but cell membranes and biofilm matrix are also likely to play a role. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5146927/ /pubmed/27934958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38610 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Mai-Prochnow, Anne Clauson, Maryse Hong, Jungmi Murphy, Anthony B. Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title | Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title_full | Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title_fullStr | Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title_short | Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
title_sort | gram positive and gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5146927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep38610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maiprochnowanne grampositiveandgramnegativebacteriadifferintheirsensitivitytocoldplasma AT clausonmaryse grampositiveandgramnegativebacteriadifferintheirsensitivitytocoldplasma AT hongjungmi grampositiveandgramnegativebacteriadifferintheirsensitivitytocoldplasma AT murphyanthonyb grampositiveandgramnegativebacteriadifferintheirsensitivitytocoldplasma |