Cargando…

Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa

BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lippman, Sheri A., Neilands, Torsten B., MacPhail, Catherine, Peacock, Dean, Maman, Suzanne, Rebombo, Dumisani, Twine, Rhian, Selin, Amanda, Leslie, Hannah H., Kahn, Kathleen, Pettifor, Audrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5147031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207
_version_ 1782473598718443520
author Lippman, Sheri A.
Neilands, Torsten B.
MacPhail, Catherine
Peacock, Dean
Maman, Suzanne
Rebombo, Dumisani
Twine, Rhian
Selin, Amanda
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kahn, Kathleen
Pettifor, Audrey
author_facet Lippman, Sheri A.
Neilands, Torsten B.
MacPhail, Catherine
Peacock, Dean
Maman, Suzanne
Rebombo, Dumisani
Twine, Rhian
Selin, Amanda
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kahn, Kathleen
Pettifor, Audrey
author_sort Lippman, Sheri A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented a theory-driven CM intervention in 11 of 22 randomly-selected villages in rural Mpumalanga Province. Cross-sectional surveys including a community mobilization measure were conducted before (n = 1181) and after (n = 1175) a 2-year intervention (2012–2014). We assessed community-level intervention effects on reported HIV testing using multilevel logistic models. We used structural equation models to explore individual-level effects, specifically whether intervention assignment and individual intervention exposure were associated with HIV testing through community mobilization. RESULTS: Reported testing increased equally in both control and intervention sites: the intervention effect was null in primary analyses. However, the hypothesized pathway, CM, was associated with higher HIV testing in the intervention communities. Every standard deviation increase in village CM score was associated with increased odds of reported HIV testing in intervention village participants (odds ratio: 2.6, P = <0.001) but not control village participants (odds ratio: 1.2, P = 0.53). Structural equation models demonstrate that the intervention affected HIV testing uptake through the individual intervention exposure received and higher personal mobilization scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community-wide gains in HIV testing due to the intervention. However, a significant intervention effect on HIV testing was noted in residents who were personally exposed to the intervention and who evidenced higher community mobilization. Research is needed to understand whether CM interventions can be diffused within communities over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5147031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51470312016-12-22 Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa Lippman, Sheri A. Neilands, Torsten B. MacPhail, Catherine Peacock, Dean Maman, Suzanne Rebombo, Dumisani Twine, Rhian Selin, Amanda Leslie, Hannah H. Kahn, Kathleen Pettifor, Audrey J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Supplement Article BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented a theory-driven CM intervention in 11 of 22 randomly-selected villages in rural Mpumalanga Province. Cross-sectional surveys including a community mobilization measure were conducted before (n = 1181) and after (n = 1175) a 2-year intervention (2012–2014). We assessed community-level intervention effects on reported HIV testing using multilevel logistic models. We used structural equation models to explore individual-level effects, specifically whether intervention assignment and individual intervention exposure were associated with HIV testing through community mobilization. RESULTS: Reported testing increased equally in both control and intervention sites: the intervention effect was null in primary analyses. However, the hypothesized pathway, CM, was associated with higher HIV testing in the intervention communities. Every standard deviation increase in village CM score was associated with increased odds of reported HIV testing in intervention village participants (odds ratio: 2.6, P = <0.001) but not control village participants (odds ratio: 1.2, P = 0.53). Structural equation models demonstrate that the intervention affected HIV testing uptake through the individual intervention exposure received and higher personal mobilization scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community-wide gains in HIV testing due to the intervention. However, a significant intervention effect on HIV testing was noted in residents who were personally exposed to the intervention and who evidenced higher community mobilization. Research is needed to understand whether CM interventions can be diffused within communities over time. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2017-01-01 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5147031/ /pubmed/27930611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Supplement Article
Lippman, Sheri A.
Neilands, Torsten B.
MacPhail, Catherine
Peacock, Dean
Maman, Suzanne
Rebombo, Dumisani
Twine, Rhian
Selin, Amanda
Leslie, Hannah H.
Kahn, Kathleen
Pettifor, Audrey
Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title_full Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title_fullStr Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title_short Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
title_sort community mobilization for hiv testing uptake: results from a community randomized trial of a theory-based intervention in rural south africa
topic Supplement Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5147031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207
work_keys_str_mv AT lippmansheria communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT neilandstorstenb communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT macphailcatherine communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT peacockdean communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT mamansuzanne communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT rebombodumisani communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT twinerhian communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT selinamanda communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT lesliehannahh communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT kahnkathleen communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica
AT pettiforaudrey communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica