Cargando…
Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa
BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5147031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207 |
_version_ | 1782473598718443520 |
---|---|
author | Lippman, Sheri A. Neilands, Torsten B. MacPhail, Catherine Peacock, Dean Maman, Suzanne Rebombo, Dumisani Twine, Rhian Selin, Amanda Leslie, Hannah H. Kahn, Kathleen Pettifor, Audrey |
author_facet | Lippman, Sheri A. Neilands, Torsten B. MacPhail, Catherine Peacock, Dean Maman, Suzanne Rebombo, Dumisani Twine, Rhian Selin, Amanda Leslie, Hannah H. Kahn, Kathleen Pettifor, Audrey |
author_sort | Lippman, Sheri A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented a theory-driven CM intervention in 11 of 22 randomly-selected villages in rural Mpumalanga Province. Cross-sectional surveys including a community mobilization measure were conducted before (n = 1181) and after (n = 1175) a 2-year intervention (2012–2014). We assessed community-level intervention effects on reported HIV testing using multilevel logistic models. We used structural equation models to explore individual-level effects, specifically whether intervention assignment and individual intervention exposure were associated with HIV testing through community mobilization. RESULTS: Reported testing increased equally in both control and intervention sites: the intervention effect was null in primary analyses. However, the hypothesized pathway, CM, was associated with higher HIV testing in the intervention communities. Every standard deviation increase in village CM score was associated with increased odds of reported HIV testing in intervention village participants (odds ratio: 2.6, P = <0.001) but not control village participants (odds ratio: 1.2, P = 0.53). Structural equation models demonstrate that the intervention affected HIV testing uptake through the individual intervention exposure received and higher personal mobilization scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community-wide gains in HIV testing due to the intervention. However, a significant intervention effect on HIV testing was noted in residents who were personally exposed to the intervention and who evidenced higher community mobilization. Research is needed to understand whether CM interventions can be diffused within communities over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5147031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51470312016-12-22 Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa Lippman, Sheri A. Neilands, Torsten B. MacPhail, Catherine Peacock, Dean Maman, Suzanne Rebombo, Dumisani Twine, Rhian Selin, Amanda Leslie, Hannah H. Kahn, Kathleen Pettifor, Audrey J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Supplement Article BACKGROUND: HIV testing uptake in South Africa is below optimal levels. Community mobilization (CM) may increase and sustain demand for HIV testing, however, little rigorous evidence exists regarding the effect of CM interventions on HIV testing and the mechanisms of action. METHODS: We implemented a theory-driven CM intervention in 11 of 22 randomly-selected villages in rural Mpumalanga Province. Cross-sectional surveys including a community mobilization measure were conducted before (n = 1181) and after (n = 1175) a 2-year intervention (2012–2014). We assessed community-level intervention effects on reported HIV testing using multilevel logistic models. We used structural equation models to explore individual-level effects, specifically whether intervention assignment and individual intervention exposure were associated with HIV testing through community mobilization. RESULTS: Reported testing increased equally in both control and intervention sites: the intervention effect was null in primary analyses. However, the hypothesized pathway, CM, was associated with higher HIV testing in the intervention communities. Every standard deviation increase in village CM score was associated with increased odds of reported HIV testing in intervention village participants (odds ratio: 2.6, P = <0.001) but not control village participants (odds ratio: 1.2, P = 0.53). Structural equation models demonstrate that the intervention affected HIV testing uptake through the individual intervention exposure received and higher personal mobilization scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community-wide gains in HIV testing due to the intervention. However, a significant intervention effect on HIV testing was noted in residents who were personally exposed to the intervention and who evidenced higher community mobilization. Research is needed to understand whether CM interventions can be diffused within communities over time. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 2017-01-01 2016-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5147031/ /pubmed/27930611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207 Text en Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Supplement Article Lippman, Sheri A. Neilands, Torsten B. MacPhail, Catherine Peacock, Dean Maman, Suzanne Rebombo, Dumisani Twine, Rhian Selin, Amanda Leslie, Hannah H. Kahn, Kathleen Pettifor, Audrey Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title | Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title_full | Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title_fullStr | Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed | Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title_short | Community Mobilization for HIV Testing Uptake: Results From a Community Randomized Trial of a Theory-Based Intervention in Rural South Africa |
title_sort | community mobilization for hiv testing uptake: results from a community randomized trial of a theory-based intervention in rural south africa |
topic | Supplement Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5147031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27930611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lippmansheria communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT neilandstorstenb communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT macphailcatherine communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT peacockdean communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT mamansuzanne communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT rebombodumisani communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT twinerhian communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT selinamanda communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT lesliehannahh communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT kahnkathleen communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica AT pettiforaudrey communitymobilizationforhivtestinguptakeresultsfromacommunityrandomizedtrialofatheorybasedinterventioninruralsouthafrica |