Cargando…

Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children

The ability to reason about causality underlies key aspects of human cognition, but the extent to which non-humans understand causality is still largely unknown. The Aesop’s Fable paradigm, where objects are inserted into water-filled tubes to obtain out-of-reach rewards, has been used to test casua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Rachael, Jelbert, Sarah A., Taylor, Alex H., Cheke, Lucy G., Gray, Russell D., Loissel, Elsa, Clayton, Nicola S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5148090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27936242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168056
_version_ 1782473796645552128
author Miller, Rachael
Jelbert, Sarah A.
Taylor, Alex H.
Cheke, Lucy G.
Gray, Russell D.
Loissel, Elsa
Clayton, Nicola S.
author_facet Miller, Rachael
Jelbert, Sarah A.
Taylor, Alex H.
Cheke, Lucy G.
Gray, Russell D.
Loissel, Elsa
Clayton, Nicola S.
author_sort Miller, Rachael
collection PubMed
description The ability to reason about causality underlies key aspects of human cognition, but the extent to which non-humans understand causality is still largely unknown. The Aesop’s Fable paradigm, where objects are inserted into water-filled tubes to obtain out-of-reach rewards, has been used to test casual reasoning in birds and children. However, success on these tasks may be influenced by other factors, specifically, object preferences present prior to testing or arising during pre-test stone-dropping training. Here, we assessed this ‘object-bias’ hypothesis by giving New Caledonian crows and 5–10 year old children two object-choice Aesop’s Fable experiments: sinking vs. floating objects, and solid vs. hollow objects. Before each test, we assessed subjects’ object preferences and/or trained them to prefer the alternative object. Both crows and children showed pre-test object preferences, suggesting that birds in previous Aesop’s Fable studies may also have had initial preferences for objects that proved to be functional on test. After training to prefer the non-functional object, crows, but not children, performed more poorly on these two object-choice Aesop’s Fable tasks than subjects in previous studies. Crows dropped the non-functional objects into the tube on their first trials, indicating that, unlike many children, they do not appear to have an a priori understanding of water displacement. Alternatively, issues with inhibition could explain their performance. The crows did, however, learn to solve the tasks over time. We tested crows further to determine whether their eventual success was based on learning about the functional properties of the objects, or associating dropping the functional object with reward. Crows inserted significantly more rewarded, non-functional objects than non-rewarded, functional objects. These findings suggest that the ability of New Caledonian crows to produce performances rivaling those of young children on object-choice Aesop’s Fable tasks is partly due to pre-existing object preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5148090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51480902016-12-28 Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children Miller, Rachael Jelbert, Sarah A. Taylor, Alex H. Cheke, Lucy G. Gray, Russell D. Loissel, Elsa Clayton, Nicola S. PLoS One Research Article The ability to reason about causality underlies key aspects of human cognition, but the extent to which non-humans understand causality is still largely unknown. The Aesop’s Fable paradigm, where objects are inserted into water-filled tubes to obtain out-of-reach rewards, has been used to test casual reasoning in birds and children. However, success on these tasks may be influenced by other factors, specifically, object preferences present prior to testing or arising during pre-test stone-dropping training. Here, we assessed this ‘object-bias’ hypothesis by giving New Caledonian crows and 5–10 year old children two object-choice Aesop’s Fable experiments: sinking vs. floating objects, and solid vs. hollow objects. Before each test, we assessed subjects’ object preferences and/or trained them to prefer the alternative object. Both crows and children showed pre-test object preferences, suggesting that birds in previous Aesop’s Fable studies may also have had initial preferences for objects that proved to be functional on test. After training to prefer the non-functional object, crows, but not children, performed more poorly on these two object-choice Aesop’s Fable tasks than subjects in previous studies. Crows dropped the non-functional objects into the tube on their first trials, indicating that, unlike many children, they do not appear to have an a priori understanding of water displacement. Alternatively, issues with inhibition could explain their performance. The crows did, however, learn to solve the tasks over time. We tested crows further to determine whether their eventual success was based on learning about the functional properties of the objects, or associating dropping the functional object with reward. Crows inserted significantly more rewarded, non-functional objects than non-rewarded, functional objects. These findings suggest that the ability of New Caledonian crows to produce performances rivaling those of young children on object-choice Aesop’s Fable tasks is partly due to pre-existing object preferences. Public Library of Science 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5148090/ /pubmed/27936242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168056 Text en © 2016 Miller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Miller, Rachael
Jelbert, Sarah A.
Taylor, Alex H.
Cheke, Lucy G.
Gray, Russell D.
Loissel, Elsa
Clayton, Nicola S.
Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title_full Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title_fullStr Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title_full_unstemmed Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title_short Performance in Object-Choice Aesop’s Fable Tasks Are Influenced by Object Biases in New Caledonian Crows but not in Human Children
title_sort performance in object-choice aesop’s fable tasks are influenced by object biases in new caledonian crows but not in human children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5148090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27936242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168056
work_keys_str_mv AT millerrachael performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT jelbertsaraha performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT tayloralexh performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT chekelucyg performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT grayrusselld performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT loisselelsa performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren
AT claytonnicolas performanceinobjectchoiceaesopsfabletasksareinfluencedbyobjectbiasesinnewcaledoniancrowsbutnotinhumanchildren