Cargando…

Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater

BACKGROUND: Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strauss, André, Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather, Ndlovu, Thando, Reyneke, Brandon, Khan, Wesaal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5148859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27938342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y
_version_ 1782473896500396032
author Strauss, André
Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather
Ndlovu, Thando
Reyneke, Brandon
Khan, Wesaal
author_facet Strauss, André
Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather
Ndlovu, Thando
Reyneke, Brandon
Khan, Wesaal
author_sort Strauss, André
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar pasteurization (SOPAS; 70 to 79 °C; 80 to 89 °C; and ≥90 °C) to solar disinfection (SODIS; 6 and 8 hrs) for their efficiency in reducing the level of microbial contamination in harvested rainwater. The chemical quality (anions and cations) of the SOPAS and SODIS treated and untreated rainwater samples were also monitored. RESULTS: While the anion concentrations in all the samples were within drinking water guidelines, the concentrations of lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) exceeded the guidelines in all the SOPAS samples. Additionally, the iron (Fe) concentrations in both the SODIS 6 and 8 hr samples were above the drinking water guidelines. A >99% reduction in Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria counts was then obtained in the SOPAS and SODIS samples. Ethidium monoazide bromide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (EMA-qPCR) analysis revealed a 94.70% reduction in viable Legionella copy numbers in the SOPAS samples, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 50.60% and 75.22% decrease, respectively. Similarly, a 99.61% reduction in viable Pseudomonas copy numbers was observed after SOPAS treatment, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 47.27% and 58.31% decrease, respectively. CONCLUSION: While both the SOPAS and SODIS systems reduced the indicator counts to below the detection limit, EMA-qPCR analysis indicated that SOPAS treatment yielded a 2- and 3-log reduction in viable Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively. Additionally, SODIS after 8 hrs yielded a 2-log and 1-log reduction in Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively and could be considered as an alternative, cost-effective treatment method for harvested rainwater.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5148859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51488592016-12-16 Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater Strauss, André Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather Ndlovu, Thando Reyneke, Brandon Khan, Wesaal BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Numerous pathogens and opportunistic pathogens have been detected in harvested rainwater. Developing countries, in particular, require time- and cost-effective treatment strategies to improve the quality of this water source. The primary aim of the current study was thus to compare solar pasteurization (SOPAS; 70 to 79 °C; 80 to 89 °C; and ≥90 °C) to solar disinfection (SODIS; 6 and 8 hrs) for their efficiency in reducing the level of microbial contamination in harvested rainwater. The chemical quality (anions and cations) of the SOPAS and SODIS treated and untreated rainwater samples were also monitored. RESULTS: While the anion concentrations in all the samples were within drinking water guidelines, the concentrations of lead (Pb) and nickel (Ni) exceeded the guidelines in all the SOPAS samples. Additionally, the iron (Fe) concentrations in both the SODIS 6 and 8 hr samples were above the drinking water guidelines. A >99% reduction in Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria counts was then obtained in the SOPAS and SODIS samples. Ethidium monoazide bromide quantitative polymerase chain reaction (EMA-qPCR) analysis revealed a 94.70% reduction in viable Legionella copy numbers in the SOPAS samples, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 50.60% and 75.22% decrease, respectively. Similarly, a 99.61% reduction in viable Pseudomonas copy numbers was observed after SOPAS treatment, while SODIS after 6 and 8 hrs yielded a 47.27% and 58.31% decrease, respectively. CONCLUSION: While both the SOPAS and SODIS systems reduced the indicator counts to below the detection limit, EMA-qPCR analysis indicated that SOPAS treatment yielded a 2- and 3-log reduction in viable Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively. Additionally, SODIS after 8 hrs yielded a 2-log and 1-log reduction in Legionella and Pseudomonas copy numbers, respectively and could be considered as an alternative, cost-effective treatment method for harvested rainwater. BioMed Central 2016-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5148859/ /pubmed/27938342 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strauss, André
Dobrowsky, Penelope Heather
Ndlovu, Thando
Reyneke, Brandon
Khan, Wesaal
Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title_full Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title_short Comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
title_sort comparative analysis of solar pasteurization versus solar disinfection for the treatment of harvested rainwater
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5148859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27938342
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0909-y
work_keys_str_mv AT straussandre comparativeanalysisofsolarpasteurizationversussolardisinfectionforthetreatmentofharvestedrainwater
AT dobrowskypenelopeheather comparativeanalysisofsolarpasteurizationversussolardisinfectionforthetreatmentofharvestedrainwater
AT ndlovuthando comparativeanalysisofsolarpasteurizationversussolardisinfectionforthetreatmentofharvestedrainwater
AT reynekebrandon comparativeanalysisofsolarpasteurizationversussolardisinfectionforthetreatmentofharvestedrainwater
AT khanwesaal comparativeanalysisofsolarpasteurizationversussolardisinfectionforthetreatmentofharvestedrainwater