Cargando…

Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda

In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006508
_version_ 1782474626726625280
author Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma
author_facet Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma
author_sort Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma
collection PubMed
description In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry expenditure to persuade legislators and government officials of their viewpoints and to influence decision-making according to commercial interests. Since 1990, however, the Associação da Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa (Interfarma – Pharmaceutical Research Industry Association), Brazilian counterpart of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), main lobbying organization of the US pharmaceutical industry, has played a major role in the advocacy of interests of major drug companies. The main goals of Interfarma lobbying activities are: shortening the average time taken by the Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) to approve marketing authorization for a new drug; making the criteria for incorporation of new drugs into SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) more flexible and speeding up technology incorporation; changing the Country’s ethical clearance system and the ethical requirements for clinical trials to meet the need of the innovative drug industry, and establishing a National Policy for Rare Diseases that allows a prompt incorporation of orphan drugs into SUS. Although lobbying affects community health and well-being, this topic is not in the public health research agenda. The impacts of pharmaceutical lobbying on health policies and health-care costs are of great importance for SUS and deserve to be investigated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5152825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51528252016-12-19 Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma Rev Saude Publica Comentário In the US, where registration of lobbyists is mandatory, the pharmaceutical industry and private health-care providers spend huge amounts of money seeking to influence health policies and government decisions. In Brazil, where lobbying lacks transparency, there is virtually no data on drug industry expenditure to persuade legislators and government officials of their viewpoints and to influence decision-making according to commercial interests. Since 1990, however, the Associação da Indústria Farmacêutica de Pesquisa (Interfarma – Pharmaceutical Research Industry Association), Brazilian counterpart of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), main lobbying organization of the US pharmaceutical industry, has played a major role in the advocacy of interests of major drug companies. The main goals of Interfarma lobbying activities are: shortening the average time taken by the Brazilian regulatory agency (ANVISA) to approve marketing authorization for a new drug; making the criteria for incorporation of new drugs into SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) more flexible and speeding up technology incorporation; changing the Country’s ethical clearance system and the ethical requirements for clinical trials to meet the need of the innovative drug industry, and establishing a National Policy for Rare Diseases that allows a prompt incorporation of orphan drugs into SUS. Although lobbying affects community health and well-being, this topic is not in the public health research agenda. The impacts of pharmaceutical lobbying on health policies and health-care costs are of great importance for SUS and deserve to be investigated. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5152825/ /pubmed/28099661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006508 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Comentário
Paumgartten, Francisco José Roma
Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_full Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_fullStr Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_short Pharmaceutical lobbying in Brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
title_sort pharmaceutical lobbying in brazil: a missing topic in the public health research agenda
topic Comentário
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28099661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006508
work_keys_str_mv AT paumgarttenfranciscojoseroma pharmaceuticallobbyinginbrazilamissingtopicinthepublichealthresearchagenda