Cargando…
Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we com...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter Open
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017 |
_version_ | 1782474647302832128 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shixin Qiu, Zhenling |
author_facet | Wang, Shixin Qiu, Zhenling |
author_sort | Wang, Shixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we compared two distinct peripheral suture methods on the strength of repaired tendons. Pig flexor digitorum profundus tendons were used in biomechanical studies and the biomechanical influence on tendon repair of continuous running peripheral suture (CRPS) and continuous locking peripheral suture (CLPS), were compared, using stitch length ranging from 1mm to 5mm. In CRPS, the 1mm stitch length group displayed the highest maximum load and breaking power, which was 1.57 fold higher than the 2mm stitch length group. Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1 and 2mm groups were statistically different from the 3, 4, and 5mm stitch length groups while comparison among the latter groups was not statistically significant. For CLPS, the 1mm group exhibited consistently the highest maximum load strength and breaking power, which was twice the strength displayed by the 2mm group. Pairwise comparisons between groups showed statistical significance. For future repairs of flexor tendon injuries, 1mm stitch length is highly recommended for simple peripheral suture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5152960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | De Gruyter Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51529602017-03-28 Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons Wang, Shixin Qiu, Zhenling Open Med (Wars) Research Article Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we compared two distinct peripheral suture methods on the strength of repaired tendons. Pig flexor digitorum profundus tendons were used in biomechanical studies and the biomechanical influence on tendon repair of continuous running peripheral suture (CRPS) and continuous locking peripheral suture (CLPS), were compared, using stitch length ranging from 1mm to 5mm. In CRPS, the 1mm stitch length group displayed the highest maximum load and breaking power, which was 1.57 fold higher than the 2mm stitch length group. Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1 and 2mm groups were statistically different from the 3, 4, and 5mm stitch length groups while comparison among the latter groups was not statistically significant. For CLPS, the 1mm group exhibited consistently the highest maximum load strength and breaking power, which was twice the strength displayed by the 2mm group. Pairwise comparisons between groups showed statistical significance. For future repairs of flexor tendon injuries, 1mm stitch length is highly recommended for simple peripheral suture. De Gruyter Open 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5152960/ /pubmed/28352683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017 Text en © 2015 S. Wang, Z. Qiu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Shixin Qiu, Zhenling Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title | Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title_full | Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title_short | Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons |
title_sort | biomechanical study of two peripheral suture methods on repaired tendons |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshixin biomechanicalstudyoftwoperipheralsuturemethodsonrepairedtendons AT qiuzhenling biomechanicalstudyoftwoperipheralsuturemethodsonrepairedtendons |