Cargando…

Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons

Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shixin, Qiu, Zhenling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017
_version_ 1782474647302832128
author Wang, Shixin
Qiu, Zhenling
author_facet Wang, Shixin
Qiu, Zhenling
author_sort Wang, Shixin
collection PubMed
description Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we compared two distinct peripheral suture methods on the strength of repaired tendons. Pig flexor digitorum profundus tendons were used in biomechanical studies and the biomechanical influence on tendon repair of continuous running peripheral suture (CRPS) and continuous locking peripheral suture (CLPS), were compared, using stitch length ranging from 1mm to 5mm. In CRPS, the 1mm stitch length group displayed the highest maximum load and breaking power, which was 1.57 fold higher than the 2mm stitch length group. Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1 and 2mm groups were statistically different from the 3, 4, and 5mm stitch length groups while comparison among the latter groups was not statistically significant. For CLPS, the 1mm group exhibited consistently the highest maximum load strength and breaking power, which was twice the strength displayed by the 2mm group. Pairwise comparisons between groups showed statistical significance. For future repairs of flexor tendon injuries, 1mm stitch length is highly recommended for simple peripheral suture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5152960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher De Gruyter Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51529602017-03-28 Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons Wang, Shixin Qiu, Zhenling Open Med (Wars) Research Article Flexor digitorum tendon injuries are challenging conditions to manage to ensure optimal patient outcomes. While several surgical approaches with high success rates have been developed, there remains no gold standard for suture technique for the repair of flexor tendon injuries. In this study, we compared two distinct peripheral suture methods on the strength of repaired tendons. Pig flexor digitorum profundus tendons were used in biomechanical studies and the biomechanical influence on tendon repair of continuous running peripheral suture (CRPS) and continuous locking peripheral suture (CLPS), were compared, using stitch length ranging from 1mm to 5mm. In CRPS, the 1mm stitch length group displayed the highest maximum load and breaking power, which was 1.57 fold higher than the 2mm stitch length group. Pairwise comparison revealed that the 1 and 2mm groups were statistically different from the 3, 4, and 5mm stitch length groups while comparison among the latter groups was not statistically significant. For CLPS, the 1mm group exhibited consistently the highest maximum load strength and breaking power, which was twice the strength displayed by the 2mm group. Pairwise comparisons between groups showed statistical significance. For future repairs of flexor tendon injuries, 1mm stitch length is highly recommended for simple peripheral suture. De Gruyter Open 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5152960/ /pubmed/28352683 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017 Text en © 2015 S. Wang, Z. Qiu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Shixin
Qiu, Zhenling
Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title_full Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title_fullStr Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title_short Biomechanical Study of Two Peripheral Suture Methods on Repaired Tendons
title_sort biomechanical study of two peripheral suture methods on repaired tendons
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5152960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28352683
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/med-2015-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshixin biomechanicalstudyoftwoperipheralsuturemethodsonrepairedtendons
AT qiuzhenling biomechanicalstudyoftwoperipheralsuturemethodsonrepairedtendons